Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | *** | 13.5 (13.2, 13.8) | N/A | 1,706 |
falling 
|
-2.4 (-2.5, -2.3) |
| United States | *** | 13.4 (13.4, 13.5) | N/A | 52,258 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) |
| Wayne County | *** | 15.7 (14.9, 16.5) | 18 (10, 32) | 328 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-2.4, -2.0) |
| Oakland County | *** | 11.9 (11.2, 12.7) | 47 (35, 61) | 191 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-2.7, -2.1) |
| Macomb County | *** | 14.3 (13.3, 15.3) | 29 (15, 45) | 160 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.3, -1.6) |
| Genesee County | *** | 14.7 (13.2, 16.3) | 25 (10, 46) | 77 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-2.8, -1.6) |
| Kent County | *** | 10.4 (9.3, 11.5) | 64 (45, 69) | 72 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-3.5, -2.6) |
| Washtenaw County | *** | 11.0 (9.5, 12.7) | 62 (35, 69) | 40 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-3.4, -2.2) |
| Saginaw County | *** | 13.9 (12.0, 16.1) | 32 (10, 58) | 38 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.0, -1.8) |
| Ingham County | *** | 12.6 (10.8, 14.6) | 46 (18, 65) | 36 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-3.7, -2.1) |
| Berrien County | *** | 15.1 (12.9, 17.7) | 22 (6, 51) | 34 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.0, -1.2) |
| Kalamazoo County | *** | 11.6 (9.9, 13.6) | 54 (26, 68) | 34 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.1, -1.9) |
| Livingston County | *** | 12.8 (10.8, 15.1) | 42 (14, 65) | 31 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.6, -1.8) |
| Ottawa County | *** | 9.4 (7.9, 11.0) | 70 (49, 71) | 30 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-4.1, -2.6) |
| St. Clair County | *** | 13.3 (11.2, 15.7) | 39 (12, 63) | 30 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.2, -1.9) |
| Jackson County | *** | 14.1 (11.9, 16.7) | 30 (8, 60) | 29 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.3, -2.1) |
| Monroe County | *** | 13.9 (11.6, 16.5) | 33 (9, 62) | 27 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.1, -1.7) |
| Bay County | *** | 16.9 (14.1, 20.2) | 12 (2, 44) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
| Muskegon County | *** | 11.7 (9.7, 14.0) | 51 (22, 68) | 25 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.2, -1.5) |
| Calhoun County | *** | 14.3 (11.8, 17.2) | 28 (8, 61) | 25 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.5, -1.7) |
| Lenawee County | *** | 15.8 (12.9, 19.3) | 15 (3, 56) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.7, -0.5) |
| Allegan County | *** | 14.0 (11.2, 17.2) | 31 (7, 65) | 19 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.1, -1.7) |
| Lapeer County | *** | 15.1 (12.0, 18.8) | 23 (4, 61) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.4, -0.9) |
| Eaton County | *** | 11.1 (8.7, 14.0) | 61 (21, 70) | 16 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-4.2, -2.3) |
| Van Buren County | *** | 15.7 (12.3, 19.9) | 17 (2, 61) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.2, -1.1) |
| Midland County | *** | 11.2 (8.6, 14.5) | 58 (18, 71) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.1, -1.7) |
| Isabella County | *** | 19.5 (14.9, 25.1) | 4 (1, 49) | 13 |
stable 
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
| St. Joseph County | *** | 16.1 (12.3, 20.7) | 14 (2, 63) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.2, -1.3) |
| Tuscola County | *** | 16.7 (12.7, 21.7) | 13 (2, 62) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.7, -1.0) |
| Grand Traverse County | *** | 9.9 (7.5, 12.8) | 66 (28, 71) | 12 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.8, -1.3) |
| Shiawassee County | *** | 13.5 (10.2, 17.5) | 36 (6, 69) | 12 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-3.8, -1.9) |
| Clinton County | *** | 12.6 (9.5, 16.3) | 45 (8, 70) | 12 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-4.3, -1.0) |
| Marquette County | *** | 13.3 (10.0, 17.4) | 38 (4, 70) | 12 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.6, -0.9) |
| Roscommon County | *** | 25.1 (18.0, 34.6) | 1 (1, 27) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.8, 0.8) |
| Sanilac County | *** | 17.5 (13.2, 23.1) | 9 (1, 60) | 11 |
stable
|
-13.4 (-46.9, 41.1) |
| Cass County | *** | 13.4 (9.9, 18.0) | 37 (5, 70) | 10 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.6, -0.6) |
| Branch County | *** | 17.2 (12.6, 23.0) | 11 (1, 62) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.3) |
| Huron County | *** | 18.0 (13.0, 24.7) | 6 (1, 61) | 10 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.1, -0.7) |
| Gratiot County | *** | 17.6 (12.9, 23.7) | 8 (1, 61) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.6, 1.5) |
| Montcalm County | *** | 11.4 (8.3, 15.3) | 56 (11, 71) | 9 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-4.7, -2.5) |
| Iosco County | *** | 17.9 (12.7, 25.3) | 7 (1, 63) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) |
| Manistee County | *** | 20.4 (14.5, 28.4) | 3 (1, 54) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.3, -0.2) |
| Newaygo County | *** | 11.6 (8.3, 16.0) | 53 (8, 71) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.3, -1.4) |
| Clare County | *** | 15.8 (11.2, 22.1) | 16 (1, 68) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.7, -0.9) |
| Delta County | *** | 12.7 (8.9, 18.0) | 44 (5, 71) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.9, -0.6) |
| Hillsdale County | *** | 11.9 (8.3, 16.7) | 48 (7, 71) | 8 |
falling
|
-3.5 (-4.9, -2.0) |
| Ionia County | *** | 11.2 (7.8, 15.6) | 57 (9, 71) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.3, -0.6) |
| Alpena County | *** | 13.7 (9.5, 19.7) | 35 (3, 71) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-4.1, -1.3) |
| Emmet County | *** | 13.1 (9.0, 18.7) | 41 (4, 71) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-3.9, -1.5) |
| Houghton County | *** | 14.8 (10.0, 21.1) | 24 (2, 70) | 7 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.4, -0.3) |
| Ogemaw County | *** | 18.2 (12.2, 26.8) | 5 (1, 67) | 7 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-4.7, -2.0) |
| Mecosta County | *** | 11.8 (7.8, 17.2) | 50 (5, 71) | 6 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-4.9, -1.6) |
| Menominee County | *** | 15.5 (10.2, 23.1) | 19 (1, 70) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.5, 0.6) |
| Osceola County | *** | 17.5 (11.6, 25.7) | 10 (1, 68) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.3, 0.5) |
| Chippewa County | *** | 11.7 (7.7, 17.3) | 52 (6, 71) | 6 |
|
|
| Gladwin County | *** | 12.8 (8.2, 19.6) | 43 (3, 71) | 6 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.3, -0.1) |
| Barry County | *** | 6.9 (4.5, 10.3) | 71 (50, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-9.9 (-16.6, -2.6) |
| Dickinson County | *** | 11.2 (7.1, 17.3) | 60 (6, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-4.0, -0.5) |
| Oceana County | *** | 13.2 (8.4, 20.0) | 40 (2, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-4.6, -0.9) |
| Antrim County | *** | 11.9 (7.3, 18.8) | 49 (4, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-5.2, -2.0) |
| Charlevoix County | *** | 11.6 (7.2, 18.2) | 55 (4, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.2, -0.8) |
| Mason County | *** | 9.8 (6.2, 15.3) | 68 (13, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-4.9, -1.4) |
| Wexford County | *** | 9.8 (6.2, 14.9) | 69 (13, 71) | 5 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-4.9, -1.9) |
| Mackinac County | *** | 22.4 (14.1, 35.9) | 2 (1, 66) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.6, 0.4) |
| Leelanau County | *** | 10.3 (5.9, 17.6) | 65 (5, 71) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-4.7, -1.3) |
| Cheboygan County | *** | 9.9 (5.9, 16.1) | 67 (9, 71) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-4.1, -0.1) |
| Otsego County | *** | 11.2 (6.9, 17.7) | 59 (5, 71) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-4.7, -1.5) |
| Gogebic County | *** | 15.2 (8.7, 25.5) | 21 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
| Kalkaska County | *** | 14.6 (8.6, 23.7) | 26 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
| Arenac County | *** | 15.4 (8.5, 26.4) | 20 (1, 71) | 4 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-4.3, -0.5) |
| Benzie County | *** | 10.9 (6.4, 18.5) | 63 (5, 71) | 4 |
|
|
| Presque Isle County | *** | 14.5 (7.6, 26.6) | 27 (1, 71) | 4 |
|
|
| Alcona County | *** | 13.8 (7.5, 27.1) | 34 (1, 71) | 3 |
|
|
| Alger County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Baraga County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crawford County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Iron County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Keweenaw County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lake County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Luce County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Missaukee County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Montmorency County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ontonagon County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oscoda County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Schoolcraft County | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/28/2022 1:53 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alger, Baraga, Crawford, Iron, Keweenaw, Lake, Luce, Missaukee, Montmorency, Ontonagon, Oscoda, Schoolcraft
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/28/2022 1:53 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alger, Baraga, Crawford, Iron, Keweenaw, Lake, Luce, Missaukee, Montmorency, Ontonagon, Oscoda, Schoolcraft
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.