Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan Yes 13.4 (13.1, 13.7) N/A 1,719 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.7)
United States Yes 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Wayne County Yes 15.6 (14.9, 16.4) 16 (9, 31) 329 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Oakland County Yes 11.6 (10.9, 12.4) 57 (39, 63) 189 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.2)
Macomb County Yes 14.2 (13.3, 15.3) 33 (15, 46) 161 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Genesee County Yes 14.8 (13.3, 16.4) 24 (10, 46) 79 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Kent County Yes 10.8 (9.7, 11.9) 65 (43, 68) 76 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.3)
Washtenaw County Yes 11.5 (10.0, 13.2) 58 (29, 68) 43 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Saginaw County Yes 13.5 (11.6, 15.7) 37 (11, 61) 37 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Ingham County Yes 12.4 (10.6, 14.4) 46 (20, 67) 36 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Kalamazoo County Yes 12.3 (10.5, 14.3) 47 (21, 67) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Berrien County Yes 15.3 (13.1, 17.9) 18 (5, 51) 35 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
St. Clair County Yes 14.8 (12.5, 17.3) 25 (7, 55) 33 stable stable trend 9.9 (-11.2, 36.0)
Ottawa County Yes 9.2 (7.8, 10.8) 68 (52, 71) 31 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
Jackson County Yes 13.8 (11.6, 16.3) 34 (8, 62) 29 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.1)
Livingston County Yes 11.4 (9.6, 13.6) 60 (26, 69) 28 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Monroe County Yes 13.2 (11.0, 15.8) 40 (11, 65) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Muskegon County Yes 11.8 (9.8, 14.0) 55 (22, 69) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Calhoun County Yes 14.7 (12.2, 17.6) 29 (6, 60) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Bay County Yes 15.5 (12.8, 18.7) 17 (4, 56) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Lenawee County Yes 16.0 (13.0, 19.5) 14 (2, 59) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Allegan County Yes 13.5 (10.9, 16.6) 36 (8, 65) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Lapeer County Yes 14.9 (11.9, 18.5) 23 (4, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.1)
Eaton County Yes 10.9 (8.5, 13.7) 64 (24, 71) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Van Buren County Yes 14.8 (11.5, 18.7) 26 (4, 66) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Isabella County Yes 20.1 (15.5, 25.7) 3 (1, 41) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Midland County Yes 11.4 (8.8, 14.6) 61 (17, 71) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Clinton County Yes 13.4 (10.3, 17.2) 38 (6, 68) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
St. Joseph County Yes 16.0 (12.2, 20.7) 13 (2, 64) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Sanilac County Yes 19.4 (14.8, 25.2) 5 (1, 49) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Grand Traverse County Yes 9.5 (7.2, 12.3) 67 (34, 71) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Tuscola County Yes 15.3 (11.5, 20.0) 19 (2, 65) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Shiawassee County Yes 12.8 (9.6, 16.7) 43 (8, 70) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Cass County Yes 14.7 (11.1, 19.4) 28 (3, 68) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Montcalm County Yes 13.4 (10.0, 17.6) 39 (5, 69) 11 stable stable trend 13.4 (-20.2, 61.1)
Marquette County Yes 12.2 (9.0, 16.2) 51 (9, 71) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Roscommon County Yes 20.0 (14.3, 28.2) 4 (1, 55) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Gratiot County Yes 18.9 (13.9, 25.2) 7 (1, 58) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Manistee County Yes 21.9 (15.7, 30.3) 1 (1, 45) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Newaygo County Yes 12.3 (8.8, 16.9) 48 (8, 71) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Branch County Yes 14.6 (10.5, 20.1) 30 (2, 70) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Clare County Yes 15.8 (11.3, 21.9) 15 (1, 67) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Huron County Yes 14.6 (10.4, 20.4) 31 (2, 70) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Delta County Yes 13.6 (9.5, 19.0) 35 (2, 71) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.8)
Iosco County Yes 17.5 (12.0, 25.2) 10 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Hillsdale County Yes 12.2 (8.5, 17.1) 49 (6, 71) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.7)
Ionia County Yes 11.7 (8.2, 16.1) 56 (8, 71) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Mecosta County Yes 14.7 (10.2, 20.7) 27 (2, 70) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Gladwin County Yes 16.1 (11.0, 23.3) 12 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Barry County Yes 8.8 (6.1, 12.5) 70 (32, 71) 7 stable stable trend 23.5 (-12.8, 75.1)
Alpena County Yes 12.9 (8.8, 18.8) 42 (4, 71) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Houghton County Yes 14.5 (9.7, 20.9) 32 (2, 70) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Chippewa County Yes 12.4 (8.3, 18.0) 45 (5, 71) 6
*
*
Emmet County Yes 11.5 (7.7, 16.8) 59 (6, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.7)
Ogemaw County Yes 16.2 (10.8, 24.1) 11 (1, 70) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Osceola County Yes 18.4 (12.4, 26.7) 8 (1, 68) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Oceana County Yes 15.0 (10.0, 22.0) 22 (1, 70) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Mason County Yes 11.8 (7.6, 17.8) 54 (5, 71) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Dickinson County Yes 12.1 (7.7, 18.5) 53 (4, 71) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Menominee County Yes 12.2 (7.8, 18.8) 52 (4, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Cheboygan County Yes 10.9 (6.8, 17.3) 63 (7, 71) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.4)
Otsego County Yes 12.7 (8.1, 19.4) 44 (3, 71) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Charlevoix County Yes 11.2 (6.8, 17.9) 62 (4, 71) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Kalkaska County Yes 17.7 (10.8, 27.8) 9 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Mackinac County Yes 20.3 (12.5, 33.5) 2 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Wexford County Yes 8.3 (5.1, 13.0) 71 (31, 71) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.1)
Antrim County Yes 10.0 (5.8, 16.7) 66 (7, 71) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Alcona County Yes 19.2 (9.8, 36.0) 6 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Benzie County Yes 12.2 (7.1, 20.6) 50 (2, 71) 4
*
*
Leelanau County Yes 8.9 (4.8, 15.9) 69 (10, 71) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.6)
Arenac County Yes 15.0 (8.2, 25.9) 21 (1, 71) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Presque Isle County Yes 15.1 (7.8, 27.9) 20 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Gogebic County Yes 13.0 (7.0, 23.0) 41 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 12:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top