Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Pancreas, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan *** 12.3 (12.0, 12.6) N/A 1,595 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.8)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 43,836 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Alcona County *** 13.5 (7.0, 27.3) 22 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Allegan County *** 9.9 (7.7, 12.6) 63 (19, 67) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Alpena County *** 11.8 (7.9, 17.5) 40 (3, 67) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.1)
Antrim County *** 10.8 (7.0, 17.0) 56 (3, 67) 5
*
*
Barry County *** 11.4 (8.2, 15.5) 49 (6, 67) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Bay County *** 13.2 (10.7, 16.1) 26 (4, 62) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Benzie County *** 11.0 (6.7, 18.3) 55 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Berrien County *** 12.3 (10.3, 14.6) 33 (9, 62) 28 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Branch County *** 12.6 (8.8, 17.5) 30 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.3)
Calhoun County *** 14.2 (11.7, 16.9) 16 (3, 54) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Cass County *** 15.4 (11.4, 20.3) 9 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.6)
Charlevoix County *** 16.2 (11.4, 22.9) 4 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Cheboygan County *** 10.7 (6.9, 16.8) 57 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Chippewa County *** 9.3 (6.0, 14.0) 65 (10, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Clare County *** 13.2 (9.1, 18.9) 25 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.7)
Clinton County *** 8.8 (6.4, 11.9) 66 (27, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Delta County *** 16.6 (12.1, 22.5) 3 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Dickinson County *** 13.9 (9.3, 20.5) 19 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Eaton County *** 12.3 (9.9, 15.2) 32 (6, 65) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Emmet County *** 13.6 (9.6, 19.2) 21 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -20.3 (-40.0, 5.8)
Genesee County *** 14.1 (12.7, 15.6) 17 (6, 42) 75 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Gladwin County *** 13.0 (8.2, 20.2) 28 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Grand Traverse County *** 11.9 (9.4, 15.0) 38 (7, 65) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Gratiot County *** 15.5 (11.1, 21.3) 8 (1, 63) 8 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.6, 14.9)
Hillsdale County *** 11.5 (8.0, 16.3) 48 (4, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Houghton County *** 11.6 (7.7, 17.0) 45 (3, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Huron County *** 15.7 (11.4, 21.5) 6 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Ingham County *** 11.3 (9.7, 13.2) 50 (16, 64) 34 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Ionia County *** 11.2 (8.0, 15.5) 52 (5, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Iosco County *** 14.2 (10.0, 20.4) 15 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0)
Isabella County *** 10.0 (6.8, 14.1) 62 (8, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Jackson County *** 14.0 (11.8, 16.5) 18 (3, 54) 30 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.6)
Kalamazoo County *** 11.6 (9.9, 13.6) 43 (14, 63) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Kalkaska County *** 14.8 (8.7, 24.1) 11 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Kent County *** 10.7 (9.6, 11.9) 58 (31, 64) 73 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Lapeer County *** 11.6 (9.0, 14.9) 44 (7, 66) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Leelanau County *** 11.5 (7.3, 18.5) 46 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Lenawee County *** 13.3 (10.6, 16.6) 23 (3, 63) 18 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.6)
Livingston County *** 11.7 (9.8, 13.9) 42 (11, 64) 29 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Macomb County *** 13.2 (12.2, 14.2) 27 (12, 43) 150 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.0)
Manistee County *** 14.4 (9.7, 21.2) 13 (1, 67) 7
*
*
Marquette County *** 8.6 (6.1, 11.8) 67 (27, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Mason County *** 13.2 (8.9, 19.3) 24 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Mecosta County *** 12.5 (8.6, 17.7) 31 (2, 67) 7
*
*
Menominee County *** 10.6 (6.3, 17.4) 60 (3, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Midland County *** 12.1 (9.5, 15.4) 34 (6, 66) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Monroe County *** 11.1 (9.1, 13.4) 53 (15, 66) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Montcalm County *** 9.7 (6.9, 13.3) 64 (14, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Muskegon County *** 13.7 (11.5, 16.1) 20 (4, 56) 30 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.8)
Newaygo County *** 12.1 (8.4, 17.1) 35 (3, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
Oakland County *** 11.8 (11.0, 12.6) 41 (24, 55) 190 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.0)
Oceana County *** 14.6 (9.9, 21.3) 12 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Ogemaw County *** 21.4 (15.2, 30.1) 1 (1, 45) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.6)
Osceola County *** 15.2 (10.0, 22.8) 10 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Otsego County *** 10.6 (6.2, 17.4) 59 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Ottawa County *** 11.5 (9.9, 13.4) 47 (15, 63) 37 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Roscommon County *** 18.7 (12.5, 27.4) 2 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Saginaw County *** 12.0 (10.2, 14.1) 36 (11, 62) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Sanilac County *** 15.6 (11.5, 21.0) 7 (1, 60) 10 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.6)
Shiawassee County *** 11.9 (9.0, 15.6) 37 (5, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
St. Clair County *** 11.3 (9.4, 13.5) 51 (13, 65) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
St. Joseph County *** 10.2 (7.3, 13.9) 61 (11, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Tuscola County *** 14.2 (10.6, 18.8) 14 (2, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Van Buren County *** 11.0 (8.3, 14.5) 54 (8, 67) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Washtenaw County *** 11.8 (10.3, 13.5) 39 (15, 62) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Wayne County *** 12.9 (12.2, 13.6) 29 (16, 43) 275 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Wexford County *** 15.9 (11.1, 22.4) 5 (1, 64) 7
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2021 2:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top