Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 40.6 (40.1, 41.1) N/A 5,405 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Oscoda County No 73.0 (55.1, 97.1) 1 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Schoolcraft County No 70.4 (52.7, 94.4) 2 (1, 45) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Ogemaw County No 63.5 (52.8, 76.5) 3 (1, 36) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Lake County No 62.0 (46.9, 81.7) 4 (1, 62) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Gladwin County No 61.9 (52.1, 73.4) 5 (1, 33) 31 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Clare County No 60.3 (51.1, 71.0) 6 (1, 32) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Arenac County No 57.2 (44.7, 73.0) 7 (1, 66) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Montmorency County No 55.7 (40.7, 76.8) 8 (1, 73) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Iosco County No 55.7 (46.3, 67.0) 9 (1, 56) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Hillsdale County No 55.1 (47.2, 64.1) 10 (2, 48) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Roscommon County No 54.2 (45.1, 65.5) 11 (1, 60) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Cass County No 53.3 (46.2, 61.3) 12 (2, 52) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.7)
Montcalm County No 52.6 (46.0, 60.0) 13 (3, 50) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Crawford County No 52.6 (40.8, 68.0) 14 (1, 75) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Chippewa County No 52.3 (43.7, 62.3) 15 (2, 62) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Alpena County No 51.6 (42.6, 62.4) 16 (2, 65) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Branch County No 51.1 (43.2, 60.1) 17 (3, 61) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Jackson County No 50.7 (46.4, 55.2) 18 (7, 45) 110 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.6, -1.1)
Manistee County No 50.7 (41.7, 61.5) 19 (2, 67) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Shiawassee County No 49.5 (43.3, 56.3) 20 (5, 60) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Mecosta County No 49.3 (41.3, 58.6) 21 (4, 68) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Osceola County No 49.0 (39.3, 60.8) 22 (3, 73) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Kalkaska County No 48.7 (37.1, 63.2) 23 (2, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Calhoun County No 48.6 (44.1, 53.5) 24 (9, 53) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Ontonagon County No 48.5 (32.4, 76.8) 25 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Gratiot County No 48.1 (40.0, 57.5) 26 (4, 70) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Baraga County No 47.5 (32.1, 69.4) 27 (1, 82) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Genesee County No 47.4 (44.8, 50.0) 28 (15, 46) 266 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Wexford County No 47.2 (38.8, 57.0) 29 (5, 72) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Newaygo County No 46.9 (40.0, 54.7) 30 (6, 68) 34 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Delta County No 46.8 (39.5, 55.5) 31 (6, 70) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
St. Clair County No 46.6 (42.7, 50.9) 32 (13, 57) 107 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Muskegon County No 46.5 (42.6, 50.7) 33 (13, 56) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Bay County No 46.2 (41.4, 51.4) 34 (11, 63) 73 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Lapeer County No 45.8 (40.6, 51.7) 35 (11, 66) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
St. Joseph County No 45.5 (39.2, 52.6) 36 (9, 69) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Alcona County No 45.3 (34.2, 62.1) 37 (3, 80) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Iron County No 45.2 (33.9, 61.1) 38 (3, 80) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Luce County No 45.2 (28.5, 70.4) 39 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Houghton County No 44.4 (36.1, 54.3) 40 (7, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Van Buren County No 43.9 (38.3, 50.2) 41 (12, 71) 47 stable stable trend -9.7 (-19.5, 1.3)
Otsego County No 43.9 (34.5, 55.3) 42 (6, 79) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Ionia County No 43.7 (37.2, 51.0) 43 (10, 75) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Macomb County No 43.7 (41.9, 45.4) 44 (28, 57) 508 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.0, -2.5)
Berrien County No 43.6 (39.8, 47.7) 45 (19, 65) 102 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Monroe County No 43.6 (39.6, 47.9) 46 (20, 66) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Wayne County No 42.9 (41.6, 44.2) 47 (35, 58) 920 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.2)
Lenawee County No 42.5 (37.8, 47.8) 48 (19, 71) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Emmet County No 42.0 (34.6, 50.8) 49 (11, 77) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Charlevoix County No 41.9 (33.1, 52.6) 50 (8, 80) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Allegan County No 41.8 (37.3, 46.8) 51 (20, 71) 66 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Tuscola County No 41.7 (35.6, 48.7) 52 (16, 77) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Sanilac County No 41.6 (34.6, 49.7) 53 (13, 78) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Eaton County No 41.3 (36.8, 46.2) 54 (25, 72) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Mackinac County No 41.0 (28.4, 58.8) 55 (3, 82) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Presque Isle County No 40.5 (29.6, 55.7) 56 (5, 82) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Mason County No 40.1 (32.3, 49.6) 57 (13, 80) 20 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.1, -1.6)
Menominee County No 39.9 (31.7, 50.2) 58 (12, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Missaukee County No 39.8 (29.3, 53.7) 59 (7, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Huron County No 39.5 (32.4, 48.2) 60 (16, 80) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Oceana County No 39.4 (31.4, 49.3) 61 (11, 81) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Marquette County No 39.4 (33.8, 45.7) 62 (22, 77) 37 falling falling trend -8.9 (-16.1, -1.2)
Dickinson County No 39.2 (31.2, 49.2) 63 (13, 81) 17 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Gogebic County No 39.2 (29.1, 52.7) 64 (7, 82) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Saginaw County No 38.9 (35.7, 42.4) 65 (38, 73) 109 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Barry County No 38.5 (32.7, 45.1) 66 (25, 79) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Cheboygan County No 38.5 (31.1, 47.7) 67 (18, 81) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Isabella County No 38.3 (31.9, 45.7) 68 (24, 80) 26 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.6, -2.3)
Ingham County No 38.0 (34.9, 41.3) 69 (43, 75) 115 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Kalamazoo County No 36.8 (33.8, 40.1) 70 (49, 75) 112 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Kent County No 34.9 (33.0, 37.0) 71 (58, 76) 249 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Livingston County No 34.9 (31.7, 38.4) 72 (53, 78) 90 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Midland County No 34.8 (30.2, 40.1) 73 (45, 80) 41 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Antrim County No 33.2 (26.0, 42.6) 74 (31, 82) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Benzie County No 32.3 (23.4, 44.3) 75 (24, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Oakland County No 30.9 (29.7, 32.1) 76 (71, 81) 511 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.1)
Grand Traverse County No 29.8 (25.9, 34.3) 77 (65, 82) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Washtenaw County No 29.8 (27.4, 32.4) 78 (70, 82) 116 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Clinton County No 29.5 (25.0, 34.8) 79 (62, 82) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Alger County No 28.1 (18.3, 43.9) 80 (27, 82) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.2)
Ottawa County No 28.1 (25.6, 30.8) 81 (72, 82) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Leelanau County Yes 23.2 (16.6, 32.3) 82 (67, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.5)
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 9:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top