Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 20.2 (19.7, 20.7) N/A 1,395 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Montcalm County Yes 11.3 (7.2, 17.2) 61 (34, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Newaygo County Yes 12.1 (7.1, 19.4) 60 (21, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.8)
Cass County Yes 13.9 (9.0, 20.9) 59 (16, 61) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.4)
Allegan County Yes 14.3 (10.7, 18.8) 58 (25, 61) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Branch County Yes 14.9 (9.2, 23.2) 57 (6, 61) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Wexford County No 15.4 (9.1, 24.9) 56 (3, 61) 4
*
*
Manistee County No 15.7 (9.1, 27.0) 55 (2, 61) 4
*
*
Grand Traverse County No 15.7 (11.5, 21.0) 54 (11, 61) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Iosco County No 16.4 (9.7, 27.8) 53 (2, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Huron County No 16.6 (10.7, 25.8) 52 (3, 61) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Ionia County No 17.1 (11.6, 24.4) 51 (4, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Marquette County No 17.4 (12.3, 24.2) 50 (4, 61) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Kent County No 17.5 (15.7, 19.5) 49 (25, 55) 70 rising rising trend 11.0 (2.9, 19.7)
Saginaw County No 17.7 (14.6, 21.2) 48 (13, 58) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Ottawa County No 17.9 (15.1, 21.0) 47 (14, 57) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
St. Joseph County No 18.0 (12.8, 25.0) 46 (3, 61) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Mason County No 18.3 (11.7, 28.5) 45 (2, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Midland County No 18.4 (13.8, 24.3) 44 (4, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Calhoun County No 18.6 (14.8, 23.2) 43 (6, 58) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Clinton County No 18.6 (13.8, 24.7) 42 (4, 60) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Oceana County No 19.0 (11.5, 30.7) 41 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Oakland County No 19.2 (17.9, 20.6) 40 (19, 48) 171 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Houghton County No 19.3 (12.1, 30.0) 39 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Barry County No 19.3 (13.4, 27.1) 38 (1, 61) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Lenawee County No 19.5 (14.9, 25.1) 37 (3, 59) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Isabella County No 19.6 (13.3, 28.0) 36 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Leelanau County No 19.7 (10.6, 34.8) 35 (1, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.4)
Hillsdale County No 19.8 (13.0, 29.1) 34 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Jackson County No 19.8 (16.1, 24.2) 33 (4, 56) 22 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Livingston County No 19.9 (16.4, 23.9) 32 (5, 54) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Roscommon County No 20.0 (13.0, 32.1) 31 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Monroe County No 20.2 (16.4, 24.8) 30 (3, 55) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Bay County No 20.3 (15.6, 26.0) 29 (2, 58) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Gratiot County No 20.3 (13.0, 30.5) 28 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Delta County No 20.6 (13.0, 31.3) 27 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Ingham County No 20.6 (17.5, 24.1) 26 (5, 51) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Tuscola County No 20.8 (14.8, 28.8) 25 (1, 59) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Emmet County No 20.8 (13.1, 32.0) 24 (1, 61) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Shiawassee County No 20.9 (15.3, 28.1) 23 (2, 58) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Kalamazoo County No 20.9 (17.7, 24.5) 22 (4, 51) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Berrien County No 21.0 (17.4, 25.3) 21 (3, 53) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Macomb County No 21.4 (19.8, 23.1) 20 (7, 38) 137 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Mecosta County No 21.4 (14.1, 31.5) 19 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Washtenaw County No 21.5 (18.7, 24.6) 18 (4, 46) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Menominee County No 21.5 (13.0, 34.9) 17 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Cheboygan County No 21.6 (13.6, 34.0) 16 (1, 61) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Ogemaw County No 21.6 (12.5, 36.2) 15 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Alpena County No 21.6 (14.0, 33.0) 14 (1, 61) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Osceola County No 21.7 (12.0, 36.6) 13 (1, 61) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Charlevoix County No 21.8 (13.1, 35.0) 12 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Eaton County No 21.9 (17.5, 27.3) 11 (2, 52) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
St. Clair County No 22.1 (18.3, 26.6) 10 (2, 48) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Van Buren County No 22.2 (16.5, 29.3) 9 (1, 56) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Genesee County No 22.2 (19.8, 25.0) 8 (4, 39) 63 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Dickinson County No 22.9 (13.6, 36.8) 7 (1, 61) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Wayne County No 23.0 (21.7, 24.3) 6 (4, 26) 265 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Muskegon County No 23.2 (19.3, 27.6) 5 (2, 45) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Clare County No 23.8 (15.0, 36.4) 4 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Lapeer County No 26.5 (20.7, 33.6) 3 (1, 42) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lake County No 27.4 (14.8, 50.8) 2 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Sanilac County No 30.2 (21.2, 42.0) 1 (1, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/17/2024 11:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top