Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 20.3 (19.8, 20.8) N/A 1,416 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.1)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Lake County Rural No 30.9 (16.4, 57.0) 1 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Alpena County Rural No 26.6 (17.4, 39.8) 2 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Mecosta County Rural No 26.1 (17.5, 37.6) 3 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Lapeer County Urban No 25.9 (20.3, 32.8) 4 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Charlevoix County Rural No 25.8 (16.7, 39.2) 5 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural No 24.7 (13.8, 41.7) 6 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Eaton County Urban No 24.4 (19.6, 30.3) 7 (1, 47) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.6)
Houghton County Rural No 24.0 (16.1, 35.0) 8 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend 28.3 (-0.1, 54.5)
Ingham County Urban No 23.8 (20.5, 27.6) 9 (2, 39) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 4.1)
Van Buren County Rural No 23.5 (17.6, 30.8) 10 (1, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Isabella County Rural No 23.2 (15.8, 32.8) 11 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Delta County Rural No 23.1 (15.2, 34.0) 12 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.0)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 23.0 (19.7, 26.8) 13 (2, 44) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 3.8)
Arenac County Rural No 23.0 (13.1, 40.5) 14 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Muskegon County Urban No 22.5 (18.7, 26.8) 15 (2, 50) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Washtenaw County Urban No 22.4 (19.6, 25.5) 16 (4, 45) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Wayne County Urban No 22.3 (21.1, 23.6) 17 (8, 33) 261 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Tuscola County Rural No 22.3 (16.2, 30.4) 18 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Clare County Rural No 22.2 (14.2, 33.9) 19 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 2.0)
Gratiot County Rural No 22.2 (14.5, 32.9) 20 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Genesee County Urban No 21.8 (19.4, 24.5) 21 (6, 44) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
St. Clair County Urban No 21.8 (18.0, 26.2) 22 (3, 51) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Barry County Urban No 21.6 (15.6, 29.4) 23 (1, 59) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Jackson County Urban No 21.4 (17.4, 26.0) 24 (3, 53) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Osceola County Rural No 21.3 (12.2, 35.5) 25 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.6)
Huron County Rural No 20.6 (12.8, 32.2) 26 (1, 63) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Macomb County Urban No 20.5 (18.9, 22.2) 27 (14, 45) 132 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Roscommon County Rural No 20.4 (12.8, 33.3) 28 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.2)
Monroe County Urban No 20.4 (16.6, 24.8) 29 (5, 57) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Calhoun County Urban No 20.3 (16.3, 25.1) 30 (4, 57) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Menominee County Rural No 20.1 (12.6, 32.5) 31 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 3.0)
Sanilac County Rural No 20.1 (12.8, 30.2) 32 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Cheboygan County Rural No 20.0 (12.5, 32.1) 33 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Ottawa County Urban No 20.0 (17.1, 23.2) 34 (8, 53) 37 stable stable trend 4.9 (-2.4, 19.4)
Berrien County Urban No 19.4 (16.0, 23.5) 35 (7, 57) 24 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Iosco County Rural No 19.4 (11.7, 31.8) 36 (1, 63) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.1)
St. Joseph County Rural No 19.0 (13.5, 26.2) 37 (2, 62) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Oakland County Urban No 19.0 (17.7, 20.3) 38 (24, 50) 173 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Kent County Urban No 18.9 (17.0, 21.0) 39 (18, 53) 74 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Bay County Urban No 18.9 (14.5, 24.3) 40 (5, 60) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Shiawassee County Rural No 18.8 (13.7, 25.5) 41 (3, 62) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Emmet County Rural No 18.8 (11.8, 29.1) 42 (2, 63) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 18.8 (11.3, 30.2) 43 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Midland County Urban No 18.7 (14.1, 24.6) 44 (5, 61) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Allegan County Rural No 18.7 (14.6, 23.6) 45 (8, 60) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Livingston County Urban No 18.6 (15.4, 22.3) 46 (10, 58) 25 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.2)
Hillsdale County Rural No 18.4 (12.1, 27.2) 47 (2, 63) 6 falling falling trend -7.5 (-24.8, -1.2)
Saginaw County Urban No 18.4 (15.2, 22.1) 48 (13, 59) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Dickinson County Rural No 17.9 (10.0, 30.4) 49 (1, 63) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.8)
Lenawee County Rural No 17.5 (13.2, 22.8) 50 (8, 62) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Marquette County Rural No 17.1 (11.9, 24.0) 51 (6, 63) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -1.0)
Ionia County Urban No 16.8 (11.4, 24.0) 52 (6, 63) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.6)
Clinton County Urban No 16.5 (12.0, 22.3) 53 (9, 63) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.3)
Oceana County Rural No 15.9 (8.7, 27.4) 54 (2, 63) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Manistee County Rural No 15.7 (9.1, 27.1) 55 (3, 63) 4
*
*
Leelanau County Urban No 15.4 (8.2, 28.4) 56 (2, 63) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.8, -1.4)
Montcalm County Urban Yes 14.7 (10.0, 21.2) 57 (14, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Grand Traverse County Urban Yes 14.6 (10.7, 19.7) 58 (23, 63) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Antrim County Rural Yes 14.3 (8.2, 25.3) 59 (7, 63) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.3, -3.4)
Wexford County Rural Yes 13.9 (7.9, 23.2) 60 (6, 63) 3
*
*
Cass County Urban Yes 12.9 (8.3, 19.6) 61 (20, 63) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.6)
Newaygo County Rural Yes 12.7 (7.7, 20.1) 62 (16, 63) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.9)
Branch County Rural Yes 10.5 (6.0, 17.5) 63 (32, 63) 3 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.9)
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 4:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top