Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Prostate, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 18.6 (18.1, 19.1) N/A 1,001 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
United States No 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 31,337 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Midland County Yes 12.4 (8.5, 17.6) 60 (26, 60) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Marquette County Yes 13.8 (9.2, 20.0) 59 (14, 60) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.5)
Tuscola County Yes 14.2 (9.1, 21.5) 58 (7, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.7)
Iosco County Yes 14.6 (8.6, 25.1) 57 (4, 60) 4 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.2, -3.3)
Newaygo County Yes 14.6 (9.2, 22.3) 56 (7, 60) 5
*
*
Roscommon County Yes 14.9 (8.9, 26.1) 55 (4, 60) 4
*
*
Alpena County Yes 15.0 (8.5, 25.4) 54 (3, 60) 3
*
*
Cheboygan County Yes 15.0 (8.7, 25.8) 53 (3, 60) 3 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.6, -1.3)
Emmet County Yes 15.4 (9.0, 25.2) 52 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Genesee County Yes 15.4 (13.2, 17.9) 51 (26, 59) 35 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Ionia County Yes 15.4 (9.6, 23.4) 50 (4, 60) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.6)
Shiawassee County Yes 15.6 (10.3, 22.7) 49 (5, 60) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Lenawee County Yes 15.8 (11.4, 21.5) 48 (8, 60) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Kent County Yes 16.3 (14.2, 18.5) 47 (22, 57) 47 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.7)
Isabella County Yes 16.7 (10.3, 25.4) 46 (3, 60) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.3, -2.0)
Mecosta County Yes 16.9 (10.2, 26.4) 45 (2, 60) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Lapeer County No 17.1 (12.0, 23.8) 44 (4, 60) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.4, -2.6)
Kalamazoo County No 17.2 (14.1, 20.9) 43 (11, 57) 21 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.4)
Gratiot County No 17.3 (10.5, 26.9) 42 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.2)
Ottawa County No 17.3 (14.3, 20.7) 41 (12, 57) 24 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Bay County No 17.3 (12.9, 22.8) 40 (6, 60) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Ogemaw County No 17.5 (9.9, 30.6) 39 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Sanilac County No 17.6 (11.3, 26.5) 38 (2, 60) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.3)
Eaton County No 17.6 (13.1, 23.1) 37 (5, 60) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Oakland County No 18.0 (16.5, 19.5) 36 (18, 48) 118 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 4.9)
Montcalm County No 18.0 (12.4, 25.3) 35 (2, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.6)
Saginaw County No 18.0 (14.7, 21.9) 34 (9, 57) 21 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.8, -3.0)
Clinton County No 18.1 (12.7, 24.9) 33 (2, 60) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Macomb County No 18.2 (16.5, 20.1) 32 (16, 49) 85 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Washtenaw County No 18.3 (15.3, 21.7) 31 (9, 55) 28 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Wexford County No 18.6 (11.1, 29.5) 30 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Grand Traverse County No 18.7 (13.8, 24.8) 29 (4, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.0)
Antrim County No 18.7 (11.2, 31.0) 28 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Dickinson County No 18.8 (11.4, 30.3) 27 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Gladwin County No 18.9 (11.5, 30.7) 26 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Oceana County No 19.0 (10.9, 31.3) 25 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Livingston County No 19.4 (15.6, 23.9) 24 (4, 55) 19 stable stable trend 5.0 (-3.7, 14.5)
Ingham County No 19.6 (16.1, 23.6) 23 (4, 53) 23 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.0)
Calhoun County No 19.8 (15.5, 25.0) 22 (3, 56) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Monroe County No 20.0 (15.8, 24.9) 21 (3, 54) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Jackson County No 20.1 (16.2, 24.8) 20 (3, 54) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.9)
St. Clair County No 20.4 (16.3, 25.2) 19 (3, 54) 18 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Allegan County No 20.9 (15.8, 27.1) 18 (2, 56) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Cass County No 21.2 (14.7, 29.8) 17 (1, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Wayne County No 21.2 (19.8, 22.7) 16 (7, 30) 179 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Houghton County No 21.3 (13.3, 32.7) 15 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.3)
Barry County No 21.4 (14.8, 30.1) 14 (1, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Menominee County No 21.5 (13.3, 34.3) 13 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Otsego County No 21.6 (12.7, 35.1) 12 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Muskegon County No 21.6 (17.5, 26.4) 11 (2, 47) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
St. Joseph County No 22.0 (15.4, 30.7) 10 (1, 57) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Clare County No 22.2 (14.1, 34.0) 9 (1, 60) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Berrien County No 22.7 (18.6, 27.4) 8 (2, 44) 22 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.6, 9.2)
Huron County No 22.7 (15.2, 33.6) 7 (1, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Van Buren County No 23.2 (17.0, 31.1) 6 (1, 54) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Chippewa County No 23.3 (15.1, 34.5) 5 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Hillsdale County No 24.5 (16.5, 35.2) 4 (1, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Delta County No 26.6 (18.6, 37.5) 3 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Manistee County No 28.0 (18.7, 41.6) 2 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.5, 10.4)
Branch County No 28.5 (19.5, 40.1) 1 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Alcona County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 4:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top