Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Bladder, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend ascending
Michigan N/A *** 4.5 (4.3, 4.7) N/A 591 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.3, 0.0)
United States N/A *** 4.1 (4.1, 4.1) N/A 16,859 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.7)
Calhoun County Urban *** 6.6 (5.0, 8.7) 5 (1, 27) 11 rising rising trend 7.0 (0.4, 30.8)
Muskegon County Urban *** 6.1 (4.7, 7.8) 7 (1, 30) 13 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.5)
Berrien County Urban *** 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) 10 (2, 34) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.8)
Genesee County Urban *** 4.9 (4.1, 5.9) 18 (6, 34) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.4)
Ottawa County Urban *** 4.1 (3.2, 5.2) 32 (11, 39) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.7)
Jackson County Urban *** 6.3 (4.9, 8.0) 6 (1, 29) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.4)
Ingham County Urban *** 5.2 (4.1, 6.5) 14 (3, 35) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Allegan County Rural *** 4.8 (3.3, 6.8) 19 (2, 39) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.7)
Livingston County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.1) 23 (5, 38) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.6)
Midland County Urban *** 3.2 (2.0, 5.2) 39 (11, 39) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.8)
Kent County Urban *** 4.5 (3.8, 5.3) 28 (10, 36) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Macomb County Urban *** 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 25 (11, 34) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Lenawee County Rural *** 4.0 (2.7, 5.9) 33 (5, 39) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.9)
Oakland County Urban *** 3.9 (3.5, 4.4) 35 (21, 38) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Saginaw County Urban *** 3.8 (2.8, 5.0) 36 (13, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.7)
Kalamazoo County Urban *** 3.4 (2.5, 4.5) 37 (18, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.7)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.6) 15 (3, 37) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
St. Clair County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.2) 22 (4, 38) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Bay County Urban *** 5.0 (3.6, 6.9) 16 (2, 38) 8 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Washtenaw County Urban *** 3.3 (2.5, 4.2) 38 (22, 39) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.5, 0.0)
Wayne County Urban *** 4.2 (3.9, 4.7) 31 (17, 35) 91 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -1.1)
Barry County Urban *** 4.7 (2.9, 7.5) 21 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Cass County Urban *** 4.6 (2.7, 7.6) 26 (2, 39) 3
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural *** 6.9 (4.0, 12.0) 4 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Clare County Rural *** 6.0 (3.4, 10.4) 8 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Clinton County Urban *** 4.4 (2.7, 6.7) 30 (3, 39) 4
*
*
Delta County Rural *** 5.5 (3.3, 9.1) 12 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Eaton County Urban *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.5) 24 (3, 39) 7
*
*
Emmet County Rural *** 7.0 (4.2, 11.4) 3 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Grand Traverse County Urban *** 4.9 (3.4, 7.0) 17 (2, 39) 7
*
*
Hillsdale County Rural *** 5.5 (3.2, 9.0) 11 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Houghton County Rural *** 7.6 (4.5, 12.4) 1 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Lapeer County Urban *** 5.3 (3.5, 7.7) 13 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Menominee County Rural *** 7.3 (4.3, 12.8) 2 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Montcalm County Urban *** 4.8 (2.9, 7.5) 20 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Shiawassee County Rural *** 5.7 (3.7, 8.4) 9 (1, 39) 6
*
*
St. Joseph County Rural *** 4.4 (2.6, 7.1) 29 (2, 39) 4
*
*
Tuscola County Rural *** 3.9 (2.2, 6.6) 34 (4, 39) 3
*
*
Van Buren County Rural *** 4.5 (2.8, 7.0) 27 (2, 39) 4
*
*
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top