Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A *** 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) N/A 756 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
United States N/A *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 20,108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1)
Eaton County Urban *** 4.7 (3.3, 6.6) 48 (12, 48) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.5, -2.6)
Clinton County Urban *** 5.1 (3.4, 7.6) 47 (7, 48) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-18.7, -2.1)
Washtenaw County Urban *** 5.1 (4.2, 6.3) 46 (15, 48) 20 stable stable trend -2.2 (-9.6, 0.0)
Wayne County Urban *** 5.2 (4.8, 5.7) 45 (25, 46) 108 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.3, -1.6)
Van Buren County Rural *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.8) 44 (6, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Oakland County Urban *** 5.2 (4.8, 5.8) 43 (24, 46) 87 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Bay County Urban *** 5.2 (3.7, 7.3) 42 (8, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Montcalm County Urban *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.1) 41 (5, 48) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -2.4)
Grand Traverse County Urban *** 5.3 (3.7, 7.5) 40 (7, 48) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Allegan County Rural *** 5.3 (3.8, 7.3) 39 (8, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
St. Joseph County Rural *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.3) 38 (4, 48) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.4)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.3 (4.1, 7.0) 37 (10, 48) 12 falling falling trend -20.8 (-37.0, -1.3)
Tuscola County Rural *** 5.4 (3.4, 8.4) 36 (4, 48) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.6)
Berrien County Urban *** 5.6 (4.3, 7.3) 35 (8, 48) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Sanilac County Rural *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.3) 34 (3, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Ottawa County Urban *** 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 33 (10, 48) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Ingham County Urban *** 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) 32 (8, 48) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Ionia County Urban *** 5.7 (3.6, 8.8) 31 (3, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Macomb County Urban *** 5.9 (5.2, 6.5) 30 (14, 42) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Cass County Urban *** 5.9 (3.7, 9.1) 29 (3, 48) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Genesee County Urban *** 5.9 (5.0, 6.9) 28 (11, 45) 32 falling falling trend -2.5 (-11.8, -1.3)
St. Clair County Urban *** 5.9 (4.6, 7.6) 27 (6, 48) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Jackson County Urban *** 6.0 (4.6, 7.6) 26 (6, 48) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Saginaw County Urban *** 6.0 (4.8, 7.5) 25 (7, 47) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.3)
Kent County Urban *** 6.0 (5.2, 6.9) 24 (11, 43) 41 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.7, -2.1)
Emmet County Rural *** 6.1 (3.6, 10.2) 23 (2, 48) 4
*
*
Midland County Urban *** 6.3 (4.4, 8.8) 22 (2, 48) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -2.0)
Livingston County Urban *** 6.5 (5.1, 8.1) 21 (4, 46) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.1)
Mecosta County Rural *** 6.5 (3.7, 10.8) 20 (1, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Barry County Urban *** 6.8 (4.5, 9.9) 19 (2, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Branch County Rural *** 6.8 (4.1, 10.8) 18 (1, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.4)
Muskegon County Urban *** 6.9 (5.3, 8.7) 17 (3, 44) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Shiawassee County Rural *** 6.9 (4.7, 10.0) 16 (2, 48) 6
*
*
Iosco County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 12.0) 15 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Lapeer County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.5) 14 (2, 47) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.3)
Marquette County Rural *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.3) 13 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Kalamazoo County Urban *** 7.2 (5.9, 8.7) 12 (3, 38) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Gratiot County Rural *** 7.3 (4.3, 11.6) 11 (1, 48) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.4)
Lenawee County Rural *** 7.3 (5.4, 9.7) 10 (2, 46) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Isabella County Rural *** 7.3 (4.5, 11.2) 9 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Alpena County Rural *** 7.4 (4.4, 12.2) 8 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Calhoun County Urban *** 7.5 (5.8, 9.6) 7 (2, 42) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Gladwin County Rural *** 8.0 (4.2, 14.3) 6 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural *** 8.3 (4.8, 14.0) 5 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Chippewa County Rural *** 9.5 (6.0, 14.5) 4 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Huron County Rural *** 9.7 (6.2, 15.0) 3 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural *** 9.8 (5.9, 15.9) 2 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Hillsdale County Rural *** 9.9 (6.7, 14.3) 1 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.9)
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 5:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top