Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota Yes 40.9 (40.2, 41.7) N/A 2,533 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Mahnomen County Yes 77.7 (47.0, 121.8) 1 (1, 78) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Wadena County Yes 76.1 (56.6, 100.8) 2 (1, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Grant County Yes 72.5 (42.5, 116.1) 3 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Lincoln County Yes 62.2 (35.1, 103.5) 4 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Watonwan County Yes 59.4 (39.6, 85.9) 5 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Morrison County Yes 59.1 (48.4, 71.7) 6 (1, 48) 24 stable stable trend 9.5 (-1.3, 21.5)
Cass County Yes 58.0 (46.1, 72.3) 7 (1, 57) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Faribault County Yes 57.9 (40.6, 80.7) 8 (1, 79) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Hubbard County Yes 56.9 (43.6, 73.6) 9 (1, 68) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Polk County Yes 56.3 (45.1, 69.6) 10 (2, 61) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Yellow Medicine County Yes 55.7 (37.0, 81.7) 11 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Lac qui Parle County Yes 55.3 (31.7, 91.4) 12 (1, 82) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.6, -0.1)
Itasca County Yes 55.1 (45.7, 66.0) 13 (2, 56) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Chippewa County Yes 54.7 (36.6, 79.1) 14 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Aitkin County Yes 53.6 (38.4, 74.0) 15 (1, 79) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Cook County Yes 53.5 (28.2, 95.1) 16 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Sibley County Yes 52.7 (36.8, 73.5) 17 (1, 81) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Fillmore County Yes 52.4 (39.3, 68.8) 18 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Stevens County Yes 52.1 (31.7, 80.8) 19 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Pope County Yes 51.5 (33.3, 76.6) 20 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.9)
Mille Lacs County Yes 51.0 (39.3, 65.4) 21 (3, 76) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Kandiyohi County Yes 50.3 (40.8, 61.4) 22 (4, 74) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Clearwater County Yes 49.9 (30.8, 77.3) 23 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Kanabec County Yes 49.8 (35.9, 68.1) 24 (2, 81) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Winona County Yes 49.6 (40.6, 60.0) 25 (5, 73) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Freeborn County Yes 49.5 (39.0, 62.3) 26 (4, 77) 18 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Rock County Yes 49.5 (31.9, 74.5) 27 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Koochiching County Yes 49.5 (34.5, 70.2) 28 (2, 82) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Martin County Yes 48.8 (35.8, 65.4) 29 (3, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Redwood County Yes 48.7 (34.1, 68.1) 30 (2, 82) 8 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Lyon County Yes 47.1 (35.5, 61.5) 31 (4, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Marshall County Yes 46.9 (29.8, 71.5) 32 (2, 82) 5
*
*
Norman County Yes 46.7 (26.5, 78.0) 33 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Lake County Yes 46.6 (30.4, 69.9) 34 (2, 82) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Douglas County Yes 46.5 (37.2, 57.6) 35 (7, 79) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Beltrami County Yes 46.4 (37.7, 56.6) 36 (7, 77) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Jackson County Yes 46.0 (28.8, 70.8) 37 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Crow Wing County Yes 45.4 (38.3, 53.5) 38 (10, 75) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Mower County Yes 45.4 (36.6, 55.7) 39 (8, 80) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Wilkin County Yes 45.3 (24.9, 77.4) 40 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Benton County Yes 44.7 (36.2, 54.8) 41 (8, 80) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Pennington County Yes 44.7 (30.4, 63.9) 42 (3, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Brown County Yes 44.7 (33.1, 59.2) 43 (4, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Clay County Yes 44.5 (37.0, 53.1) 44 (12, 76) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Renville County Yes 44.5 (30.1, 63.9) 45 (3, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
St. Louis County Yes 44.4 (40.4, 48.7) 46 (20, 63) 107 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Ramsey County Yes 44.2 (41.6, 46.8) 47 (26, 58) 245 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Chisago County Yes 44.0 (37.0, 52.1) 48 (13, 76) 30 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Goodhue County Yes 42.8 (35.0, 52.1) 49 (13, 80) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Becker County Yes 42.8 (34.0, 53.6) 50 (9, 81) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Steele County Yes 42.8 (34.0, 53.3) 51 (10, 81) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Swift County Yes 42.7 (24.9, 68.9) 52 (2, 82) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.5)
Rice County Yes 42.2 (35.4, 50.0) 53 (16, 79) 30 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Anoka County Yes 42.1 (39.2, 45.1) 54 (30, 67) 171 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Pipestone County Yes 42.0 (26.5, 64.8) 55 (3, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Wabasha County Yes 40.8 (30.6, 54.1) 56 (9, 82) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Isanti County Yes 40.8 (32.6, 50.6) 57 (12, 81) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Otter Tail County Yes 40.7 (33.7, 48.8) 58 (18, 80) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
McLeod County Yes 40.4 (31.9, 50.6) 59 (14, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Meeker County Yes 39.9 (29.6, 53.0) 60 (10, 82) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Nobles County Yes 39.5 (28.5, 53.6) 61 (9, 82) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.8)
Stearns County Yes 38.8 (34.4, 43.6) 62 (33, 79) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Blue Earth County Yes 38.7 (31.8, 46.7) 63 (20, 82) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.0)
Wright County Yes 38.6 (34.1, 43.5) 64 (32, 80) 56 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Le Sueur County Yes 38.5 (29.1, 50.1) 65 (13, 82) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Dodge County Yes 38.3 (27.3, 52.6) 66 (9, 82) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Sherburne County Yes 38.2 (33.0, 44.1) 67 (32, 81) 40 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.9)
Houston County Yes 37.8 (26.4, 53.0) 68 (9, 82) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Pine County Yes 37.6 (29.1, 48.2) 69 (20, 82) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Dakota County Yes 37.3 (34.9, 40.0) 70 (48, 78) 180 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Waseca County Yes 37.3 (26.1, 52.2) 71 (9, 82) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Carlton County Yes 37.3 (29.4, 46.9) 72 (20, 82) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Hennepin County Yes 37.0 (35.5, 38.6) 73 (53, 76) 495 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Washington County Yes 36.8 (33.7, 40.2) 74 (47, 80) 109 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Nicollet County Yes 36.7 (28.0, 47.4) 75 (18, 82) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Olmsted County Yes 36.4 (32.3, 40.9) 76 (43, 81) 61 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.4)
Scott County Yes 35.4 (31.3, 39.9) 77 (46, 81) 56 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.3)
Todd County Yes 35.0 (25.2, 47.7) 78 (19, 82) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Murray County Yes 32.9 (18.9, 55.7) 79 (9, 82) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.3)
Roseau County Yes 32.8 (22.1, 47.9) 80 (16, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Carver County Yes 32.7 (28.1, 37.9) 81 (51, 82) 38 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Cottonwood County Yes 29.7 (17.6, 48.1) 82 (15, 82) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Big Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/01/2023 6:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top