Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A Yes 12.9 (12.4, 13.5) N/A 439 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States N/A Yes 14.4 (14.4, 14.5) N/A 29,194 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Hennepin County Urban Yes 12.4 (11.3, 13.5) 19 (11, 24) 98 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 6.4)
Ramsey County Urban Yes 14.1 (12.3, 16.1) 12 (5, 22) 45 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Dakota County Urban Yes 12.9 (11.1, 15.0) 17 (7, 25) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Anoka County Urban Yes 13.0 (11.0, 15.2) 16 (7, 25) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Washington County Urban Yes 12.0 (9.8, 14.6) 21 (8, 26) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Stearns County Urban Yes 16.0 (12.4, 20.2) 8 (2, 23) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Olmsted County Urban Yes 13.1 (10.1, 16.7) 15 (5, 26) 13 stable stable trend 16.2 (-2.2, 28.2)
St. Louis County Urban Yes 10.8 (8.2, 14.0) 25 (9, 27) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -1.0)
Scott County Urban Yes 11.1 (8.4, 14.4) 24 (8, 27) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.6)
Wright County Urban Yes 12.2 (9.3, 15.9) 20 (5, 27) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.7)
Carver County Urban Yes 11.5 (8.3, 15.7) 22 (6, 27) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 9.5)
Rice County Rural Yes 17.0 (11.6, 24.0) 6 (1, 25) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Crow Wing County Rural Yes 14.8 (9.7, 21.7) 11 (1, 27) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Sherburne County Urban Yes 7.6 (4.9, 11.2) 27 (19, 27) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.3)
Chisago County Urban Yes 14.0 (9.0, 20.9) 13 (2, 27) 5
*
*
Itasca County Rural Yes 19.1 (12.1, 28.7) 4 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Otter Tail County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.4, 22.6) 10 (1, 27) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 0.9)
Blue Earth County Urban Yes 11.3 (6.9, 17.3) 23 (4, 27) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -1.1)
Clay County Urban Yes 9.9 (6.0, 15.3) 26 (7, 27) 4
*
*
Kandiyohi County Rural Yes 17.2 (10.5, 26.5) 5 (1, 26) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.5)
Beltrami County Rural Yes 16.5 (9.9, 25.5) 7 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Winona County Rural Yes 15.4 (9.3, 24.0) 9 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Goodhue County Rural Yes 13.4 (7.9, 21.1) 14 (2, 27) 4
*
*
Freeborn County Rural Yes 20.8 (12.1, 33.2) 3 (1, 26) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.0)
Brown County Rural Yes 23.6 (13.4, 38.2) 1 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Isanti County Urban Yes 12.9 (7.3, 20.9) 18 (2, 27) 3
*
*
Mille Lacs County Urban Yes 21.3 (12.2, 34.5) 2 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Aitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Becker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Le Sueur County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLeod County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mower County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top