Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota No 486.7 (482.3, 491.2) N/A 9,488 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Mahnomen County No 685.6 (533.1, 868.5) 1 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Chippewa County No 626.1 (534.8, 728.9) 2 (1, 60) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Wadena County No 617.2 (531.0, 713.7) 3 (1, 58) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Mille Lacs County No 613.3 (546.5, 686.0) 4 (1, 40) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Polk County No 596.7 (536.5, 661.8) 5 (1, 45) 75 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.1, 9.6)
Norman County No 581.1 (464.8, 718.3) 6 (1, 84) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lincoln County No 573.0 (453.5, 715.1) 7 (1, 86) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Nobles County No 570.2 (496.5, 651.7) 8 (1, 74) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Wilkin County No 563.1 (442.9, 706.0) 9 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Martin County No 560.0 (494.5, 631.9) 10 (1, 72) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Traverse County No 557.8 (413.6, 738.1) 11 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Chisago County No 548.6 (501.5, 598.9) 12 (3, 61) 104 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Cass County No 547.4 (494.4, 604.6) 13 (2, 68) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Pipestone County No 543.8 (445.3, 657.8) 14 (1, 86) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Pine County No 542.7 (486.7, 603.3) 15 (3, 75) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Aitkin County No 542.2 (478.2, 612.6) 16 (2, 78) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Clearwater County No 542.0 (442.1, 658.0) 17 (1, 86) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Red Lake County No 541.7 (394.6, 725.3) 18 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Faribault County No 540.6 (464.7, 625.6) 19 (1, 83) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Meeker County No 540.5 (477.2, 610.0) 20 (2, 77) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Sibley County No 539.9 (459.6, 630.2) 21 (1, 84) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
St. Louis County No 538.4 (515.8, 561.7) 22 (9, 47) 446 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Itasca County No 537.8 (494.1, 584.4) 23 (4, 66) 116 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Le Sueur County No 537.8 (477.0, 604.0) 24 (2, 76) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Big Stone County No 534.7 (414.6, 679.2) 25 (1, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Benton County No 532.2 (475.7, 593.4) 26 (3, 78) 68 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Cottonwood County No 527.1 (443.6, 622.0) 27 (2, 86) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Renville County No 527.0 (450.8, 612.6) 28 (1, 85) 36 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Rock County No 525.9 (431.1, 635.9) 29 (1, 87) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Isanti County No 525.6 (473.0, 582.4) 30 (5, 78) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Goodhue County No 524.9 (480.4, 572.5) 31 (6, 73) 105 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Yellow Medicine County No 524.8 (432.1, 631.7) 32 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Brown County No 524.5 (466.8, 587.6) 33 (4, 79) 63 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Becker County No 522.7 (470.9, 578.7) 34 (4, 77) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Morrison County No 521.7 (469.0, 578.8) 35 (5, 79) 74 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Douglas County No 520.4 (473.9, 570.4) 36 (6, 76) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Carlton County No 513.9 (460.8, 571.4) 37 (6, 82) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Kanabec County No 509.5 (436.4, 591.2) 38 (3, 86) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Crow Wing County No 508.6 (473.1, 546.2) 39 (11, 74) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Wabasha County No 506.8 (445.3, 574.6) 40 (5, 85) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Kittson County No 506.6 (384.6, 656.6) 41 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Watonwan County No 505.8 (417.3, 607.8) 42 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Lyon County No 505.6 (440.8, 577.2) 43 (4, 85) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Mower County No 504.5 (455.6, 557.2) 44 (8, 82) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Anoka County No 502.0 (482.8, 521.7) 45 (24, 64) 545 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Sherburne County No 500.6 (460.7, 543.0) 46 (12, 79) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Koochiching County No 500.3 (426.0, 584.1) 47 (3, 86) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Winona County No 500.2 (455.0, 548.6) 48 (10, 80) 93 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Waseca County No 499.7 (427.8, 580.2) 49 (3, 86) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Wright County No 499.5 (467.6, 533.0) 50 (16, 75) 190 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Swift County No 496.5 (406.7, 600.6) 51 (2, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Fillmore County No 496.4 (434.0, 565.3) 52 (6, 85) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Stevens County No 496.3 (392.0, 619.6) 53 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Clay County No 495.9 (451.3, 543.6) 54 (12, 80) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Beltrami County No 495.2 (446.9, 547.3) 55 (10, 83) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Hubbard County No 490.8 (432.7, 554.5) 56 (8, 85) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Freeborn County No 490.2 (440.5, 544.2) 57 (9, 84) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Ramsey County No 487.1 (472.3, 502.4) 58 (35, 70) 845 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Blue Earth County No 485.7 (443.3, 531.1) 59 (15, 83) 100 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Rice County No 484.2 (444.1, 527.0) 60 (15, 82) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Stearns County No 483.7 (457.3, 511.3) 61 (27, 78) 256 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Jackson County No 483.1 (395.1, 584.9) 62 (3, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Pennington County No 481.8 (403.0, 571.6) 63 (5, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Lake County No 477.6 (401.9, 564.1) 64 (5, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Marshall County No 471.8 (384.3, 573.6) 65 (3, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Redwood County No 468.0 (398.0, 547.0) 66 (8, 87) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
McLeod County No 467.7 (419.0, 520.4) 67 (16, 86) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Hennepin County No 465.0 (455.3, 474.9) 68 (54, 78) 1,816 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Washington County No 465.0 (444.1, 486.6) 69 (46, 80) 387 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Nicollet County No 464.7 (410.3, 524.1) 70 (15, 87) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Scott County No 463.8 (432.0, 497.4) 71 (33, 84) 168 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Otter Tail County No 462.3 (427.6, 499.0) 72 (32, 85) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Dakota County No 461.6 (445.1, 478.7) 73 (50, 81) 611 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Kandiyohi County No 458.7 (414.2, 506.7) 74 (25, 86) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Steele County No 456.6 (407.8, 509.8) 75 (20, 87) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Cook County No 451.9 (346.8, 579.4) 76 (3, 87) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Dodge County No 450.3 (380.6, 529.0) 77 (13, 87) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Roseau County No 449.5 (376.0, 533.1) 78 (10, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Lake of the Woods County No 442.7 (317.8, 600.9) 79 (2, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Murray County No 438.6 (352.5, 539.6) 80 (6, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Olmsted County No 432.5 (407.7, 458.4) 81 (61, 87) 233 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Lac qui Parle County No 432.0 (339.6, 542.4) 82 (7, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Houston County No 427.1 (366.0, 495.4) 83 (26, 87) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Grant County No 420.2 (321.7, 540.5) 84 (6, 87) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Carver County No 414.7 (380.8, 450.8) 85 (63, 87) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Pope County No 411.5 (337.4, 497.2) 86 (22, 87) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Todd County No 408.3 (356.8, 465.2) 87 (46, 87) 46 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 2:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top