Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota *** 504.7 (500.0, 509.3) N/A 9,399 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States *** 522.2 (521.6, 522.8) N/A 565,890 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Aitkin County *** 575.7 (509.2, 648.6) 11 (1, 68) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Anoka County *** 525.0 (504.6, 546.0) 33 (18, 59) 531 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Becker County *** 513.0 (461.0, 569.3) 45 (8, 82) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Beltrami County *** 533.6 (482.3, 588.8) 28 (5, 76) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Benton County *** 486.3 (432.0, 545.5) 66 (12, 86) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Big Stone County *** 513.9 (400.4, 650.3) 43 (1, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Blue Earth County *** 487.1 (444.2, 533.1) 64 (18, 83) 99 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Brown County *** 520.5 (462.6, 583.7) 39 (5, 80) 62 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Carlton County *** 616.0 (556.9, 679.6) 4 (1, 38) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Carver County *** 431.9 (395.7, 470.5) 82 (57, 87) 113 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Cass County *** 569.1 (514.0, 628.5) 14 (2, 64) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Chippewa County *** 624.5 (533.3, 727.2) 3 (1, 69) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Chisago County *** 511.1 (464.3, 561.3) 47 (9, 80) 91 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Clay County *** 513.5 (467.6, 562.7) 44 (9, 79) 95 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Clearwater County *** 572.8 (468.4, 693.6) 13 (1, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Cook County *** 469.1 (359.4, 601.9) 74 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Cottonwood County *** 495.8 (414.2, 589.0) 56 (4, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Crow Wing County *** 522.9 (485.9, 562.1) 35 (11, 73) 151 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Dakota County *** 479.5 (461.9, 497.5) 69 (43, 77) 592 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Dodge County *** 511.0 (435.6, 595.6) 49 (3, 86) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Douglas County *** 528.8 (480.8, 580.3) 32 (7, 76) 92 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Faribault County *** 555.6 (478.2, 642.2) 18 (1, 82) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Fillmore County *** 476.7 (415.1, 544.8) 70 (12, 86) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Freeborn County *** 535.7 (482.8, 592.9) 26 (4, 75) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Goodhue County *** 538.6 (493.1, 587.1) 24 (5, 71) 107 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Grant County *** 539.5 (426.4, 674.0) 23 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hennepin County *** 487.1 (476.9, 497.5) 63 (45, 72) 1,816 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Houston County *** 480.2 (414.3, 553.4) 67 (9, 87) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Hubbard County *** 530.3 (469.0, 597.4) 30 (3, 80) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Isanti County *** 529.8 (475.4, 588.7) 31 (5, 79) 71 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Itasca County *** 579.8 (533.9, 628.7) 9 (2, 49) 122 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Jackson County *** 573.1 (478.7, 680.8) 12 (1, 82) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Kanabec County *** 469.2 (397.7, 549.9) 73 (8, 87) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Kandiyohi County *** 497.4 (450.1, 548.3) 54 (13, 83) 84 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Kittson County *** 490.7 (370.2, 639.0) 59 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Koochiching County *** 560.4 (480.5, 649.8) 17 (1, 81) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Lac qui Parle County *** 437.3 (345.5, 546.5) 81 (8, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Lake County *** 479.6 (402.0, 568.1) 68 (5, 87) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Lake of the Woods County *** 429.1 (305.2, 586.3) 84 (2, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Le Sueur County *** 522.4 (461.5, 589.1) 36 (5, 82) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lincoln County *** 539.7 (423.7, 678.2) 22 (1, 87) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Lyon County *** 537.8 (470.6, 611.8) 25 (2, 81) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Mahnomen County *** 675.6 (526.6, 854.3) 1 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Marshall County *** 407.1 (325.7, 502.9) 86 (24, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Martin County *** 587.6 (520.1, 661.5) 8 (1, 65) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
McLeod County *** 451.7 (403.2, 504.4) 78 (31, 87) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Meeker County *** 533.0 (469.1, 603.1) 29 (3, 81) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Mille Lacs County *** 603.8 (537.1, 676.6) 6 (1, 54) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Morrison County *** 517.3 (464.0, 575.0) 41 (7, 81) 71 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Mower County *** 521.1 (471.2, 574.9) 37 (7, 79) 85 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Murray County *** 426.7 (341.1, 527.4) 85 (12, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Nicollet County *** 461.1 (405.9, 521.6) 75 (21, 87) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Nobles County *** 587.8 (512.9, 670.4) 7 (1, 68) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Norman County *** 523.8 (414.3, 653.6) 34 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Olmsted County *** 431.0 (405.6, 457.6) 83 (64, 87) 220 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.7, 8.4)
Otter Tail County *** 501.8 (465.1, 540.6) 52 (17, 78) 143 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Pennington County *** 450.8 (374.1, 538.7) 79 (11, 87) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Pine County *** 579.0 (519.9, 642.8) 10 (1, 66) 71 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Pipestone County *** 496.9 (405.5, 603.1) 55 (2, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Polk County *** 555.6 (497.4, 618.7) 19 (2, 73) 69 rising rising trend 12.6 (1.1, 25.5)
Pope County *** 404.4 (332.0, 488.3) 87 (31, 87) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Ramsey County *** 511.1 (495.5, 526.9) 48 (27, 63) 858 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Red Lake County *** 443.2 (310.4, 613.1) 80 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Redwood County *** 490.4 (418.5, 571.2) 61 (5, 86) 35 stable stable trend -9.7 (-19.5, 1.3)
Renville County *** 489.3 (415.5, 572.4) 62 (5, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Rice County *** 493.9 (452.2, 538.3) 57 (17, 81) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Rock County *** 563.5 (464.3, 678.0) 15 (1, 85) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Roseau County *** 457.0 (381.0, 543.6) 76 (10, 87) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Scott County *** 470.8 (436.9, 506.5) 72 (34, 84) 154 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Sherburne County *** 502.4 (460.2, 547.3) 51 (14, 80) 113 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Sibley County *** 546.8 (466.2, 637.3) 21 (1, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
St. Louis County *** 562.4 (539.0, 586.7) 16 (7, 39) 451 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Stearns County *** 499.8 (472.1, 528.6) 53 (23, 76) 249 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Steele County *** 471.7 (421.2, 526.7) 71 (19, 86) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Stevens County *** 510.1 (406.6, 631.9) 50 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Swift County *** 456.3 (371.2, 555.5) 77 (5, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Todd County *** 491.4 (433.4, 555.0) 58 (9, 85) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Traverse County *** 551.7 (408.5, 730.3) 20 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Wabasha County *** 520.6 (456.9, 590.6) 38 (3, 83) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Wadena County *** 653.9 (564.9, 753.1) 2 (1, 45) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Waseca County *** 517.5 (443.1, 600.7) 40 (3, 85) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Washington County *** 490.5 (468.1, 513.6) 60 (33, 77) 378 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Watonwan County *** 487.1 (401.2, 586.1) 65 (4, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Wilkin County *** 612.7 (487.8, 760.1) 5 (1, 84) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Winona County *** 515.1 (468.5, 565.0) 42 (8, 80) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Wright County *** 535.4 (501.0, 571.5) 27 (10, 65) 188 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Yellow Medicine County *** 512.6 (421.8, 617.3) 46 (2, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2021 3:32 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top