Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota No 856.8 (848.0, 865.7) N/A 7,397 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Chippewa County No 1,111.0 (936.1, 1,309.5) 1 (1, 67) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Traverse County No 1,104.4 (810.0, 1,471.8) 2 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Mille Lacs County No 1,100.5 (968.4, 1,245.5) 3 (1, 39) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Mahnomen County No 1,090.3 (811.8, 1,433.2) 4 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Wilkin County No 1,047.6 (804.2, 1,341.3) 5 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Nobles County No 1,019.9 (874.9, 1,181.8) 6 (1, 70) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Norman County No 1,015.2 (793.7, 1,280.0) 7 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Polk County No 1,005.1 (890.5, 1,130.4) 8 (1, 63) 58 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.7, 8.3)
Le Sueur County No 992.1 (869.0, 1,127.5) 9 (1, 66) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Martin County No 973.4 (848.8, 1,111.0) 10 (1, 75) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Chisago County No 973.3 (878.1, 1,075.8) 11 (2, 63) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Brown County No 970.2 (855.2, 1,096.3) 12 (1, 71) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Cottonwood County No 968.5 (805.9, 1,154.2) 13 (1, 83) 26 rising rising trend 7.1 (0.9, 13.8)
Sibley County No 967.9 (810.6, 1,147.0) 14 (1, 83) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Meeker County No 958.8 (835.2, 1,095.5) 15 (1, 75) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Pine County No 956.6 (846.8, 1,076.6) 16 (2, 72) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lincoln County No 956.2 (739.8, 1,216.2) 17 (1, 86) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Isanti County No 954.3 (847.9, 1,070.2) 18 (2, 70) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Renville County No 951.8 (802.0, 1,121.5) 19 (1, 82) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Goodhue County No 945.4 (856.7, 1,040.8) 20 (3, 70) 85 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Faribault County No 945.3 (799.8, 1,109.5) 21 (1, 83) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
St. Louis County No 941.6 (897.5, 987.4) 22 (8, 47) 352 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Clearwater County No 940.4 (750.3, 1,163.8) 23 (1, 86) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Wadena County No 937.4 (788.0, 1,107.2) 24 (1, 84) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Cass County No 915.1 (816.4, 1,022.4) 25 (4, 76) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Swift County No 913.1 (737.0, 1,118.7) 26 (1, 86) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Carlton County No 913.0 (807.4, 1,028.5) 27 (3, 80) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Itasca County No 912.8 (830.2, 1,001.2) 28 (6, 73) 92 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Rock County No 907.8 (726.1, 1,121.3) 29 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Big Stone County No 905.9 (691.7, 1,166.2) 30 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Douglas County No 904.8 (816.3, 1,000.2) 31 (6, 76) 77 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Crow Wing County No 903.9 (834.5, 977.5) 32 (8, 72) 127 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Pipestone County No 898.9 (717.2, 1,112.6) 33 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Benton County No 898.5 (788.0, 1,020.1) 34 (4, 82) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Wright County No 897.8 (833.0, 966.3) 35 (10, 70) 145 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Sherburne County No 893.1 (811.7, 980.5) 36 (8, 76) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Aitkin County No 892.4 (779.0, 1,017.6) 37 (4, 82) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Waseca County No 889.1 (747.8, 1,049.1) 38 (2, 85) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Anoka County No 888.4 (849.6, 928.6) 39 (18, 60) 406 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Becker County No 886.2 (787.6, 993.6) 40 (6, 82) 60 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Lake of the Woods County No 884.0 (623.0, 1,217.0) 41 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Red Lake County No 879.0 (611.6, 1,222.3) 42 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Stearns County No 873.8 (820.8, 929.2) 43 (17, 72) 207 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Kanabec County No 872.3 (731.2, 1,032.5) 44 (3, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Winona County No 866.1 (778.8, 960.4) 45 (10, 80) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Wabasha County No 861.7 (744.5, 992.0) 46 (5, 85) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Clay County No 860.3 (773.2, 954.4) 47 (10, 82) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Mower County No 857.7 (764.2, 959.4) 48 (8, 83) 65 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Blue Earth County No 856.3 (773.2, 946.0) 49 (12, 81) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Yellow Medicine County No 854.2 (682.6, 1,055.9) 50 (2, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Rice County No 851.1 (771.6, 936.5) 51 (14, 81) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Ramsey County No 843.8 (814.5, 874.0) 52 (34, 70) 647 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Lyon County No 842.7 (721.2, 978.8) 53 (6, 86) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Watonwan County No 835.9 (673.2, 1,026.1) 54 (3, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Beltrami County No 835.2 (742.2, 936.6) 55 (12, 85) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Fillmore County No 835.1 (717.5, 966.5) 56 (8, 86) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Kittson County No 834.6 (606.8, 1,120.2) 57 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Scott County No 834.3 (768.8, 903.9) 58 (22, 81) 123 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Washington County No 832.9 (790.6, 876.9) 59 (32, 76) 298 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Freeborn County No 831.4 (737.5, 934.0) 60 (12, 84) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Hennepin County No 830.3 (810.7, 850.3) 61 (42, 71) 1,417 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Lake County No 825.3 (681.9, 990.3) 62 (4, 87) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Dakota County No 825.0 (791.3, 859.6) 63 (37, 75) 467 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Koochiching County No 824.4 (686.0, 982.4) 64 (5, 87) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pennington County No 819.9 (669.4, 994.1) 65 (4, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Dodge County No 818.3 (677.5, 979.4) 66 (5, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Morrison County No 811.6 (715.4, 917.2) 67 (15, 86) 53 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Nicollet County No 807.6 (702.4, 924.0) 68 (11, 86) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Roseau County No 805.8 (658.7, 975.9) 69 (6, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Otter Tail County No 802.7 (736.6, 873.2) 70 (30, 84) 111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Jackson County No 800.9 (642.2, 987.1) 71 (4, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Hubbard County No 797.4 (690.3, 916.4) 72 (12, 87) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
McLeod County No 796.2 (703.3, 898.0) 73 (20, 87) 54 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Kandiyohi County No 790.9 (704.7, 884.8) 74 (24, 86) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Redwood County No 787.1 (656.2, 936.5) 75 (7, 87) 27 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Cook County No 784.2 (586.2, 1,027.3) 76 (2, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Stevens County No 779.2 (595.1, 1,001.6) 77 (3, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Marshall County No 777.7 (615.8, 969.2) 78 (5, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Steele County No 758.5 (665.8, 860.5) 79 (28, 87) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Olmsted County No 753.6 (704.9, 804.8) 80 (56, 86) 181 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Houston County No 753.2 (634.1, 888.0) 81 (19, 87) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Carver County No 746.2 (676.5, 821.0) 82 (43, 87) 87 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Murray County No 731.9 (576.3, 916.3) 83 (12, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Todd County No 724.1 (624.0, 835.7) 84 (29, 87) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Lac qui Parle County No 709.8 (542.1, 912.3) 85 (10, 87) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Grant County No 686.4 (507.2, 908.6) 86 (11, 87) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Pope County No 668.3 (535.6, 823.9) 87 (29, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 9:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top