Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota No 169.9 (167.8, 172.0) N/A 5,236 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Norman County No 228.2 (172.2, 299.5) 1 (1, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Mille Lacs County No 226.7 (194.0, 263.6) 2 (1, 45) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Polk County No 224.9 (195.2, 258.1) 3 (1, 40) 43 rising rising trend 6.5 (0.6, 12.7)
Traverse County No 220.6 (151.8, 319.1) 4 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Brown County No 219.8 (189.5, 254.1) 5 (1, 49) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Wadena County No 219.6 (178.9, 267.7) 6 (1, 70) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Mahnomen County No 214.3 (147.8, 302.0) 7 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Lake of the Woods County No 210.5 (137.7, 313.5) 8 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Chippewa County No 209.2 (166.6, 260.4) 9 (1, 82) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Yellow Medicine County No 207.8 (161.5, 264.6) 10 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Wilkin County No 204.7 (149.1, 276.4) 11 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Le Sueur County No 202.3 (172.1, 236.5) 12 (1, 73) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Nobles County No 200.4 (167.1, 238.6) 13 (1, 78) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Cass County No 198.4 (173.6, 226.5) 14 (2, 66) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Grant County No 198.4 (140.8, 274.2) 15 (1, 87) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Itasca County No 196.4 (175.3, 219.6) 16 (3, 62) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Rock County No 196.0 (150.7, 252.4) 17 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Crow Wing County No 195.0 (177.2, 214.3) 18 (4, 60) 94 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Goodhue County No 194.9 (173.1, 219.0) 19 (3, 69) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Faribault County No 194.8 (156.6, 240.6) 20 (1, 83) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
St. Louis County No 191.6 (180.8, 202.9) 21 (10, 49) 251 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Isanti County No 191.4 (166.0, 219.7) 22 (3, 76) 43 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Renville County No 190.2 (154.5, 232.7) 23 (1, 85) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Swift County No 190.1 (146.3, 244.8) 24 (1, 87) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Clearwater County No 190.1 (144.7, 246.8) 25 (1, 87) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Martin County No 189.7 (160.3, 223.9) 26 (2, 82) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Stevens County No 189.3 (140.5, 250.2) 27 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Becker County No 188.6 (164.4, 215.8) 28 (4, 78) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Big Stone County No 188.2 (134.1, 262.5) 29 (1, 87) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Benton County No 185.9 (159.4, 215.6) 30 (3, 81) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Carlton County No 185.0 (159.9, 213.0) 31 (4, 80) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Kanabec County No 184.9 (150.6, 225.7) 32 (2, 85) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Morrison County No 184.7 (160.4, 212.1) 33 (5, 79) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Sibley County No 184.2 (146.4, 229.3) 34 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Cook County No 183.9 (128.3, 260.6) 35 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Freeborn County No 183.6 (159.1, 211.3) 36 (5, 80) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Sherburne County No 182.4 (163.4, 203.0) 37 (9, 77) 75 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Pipestone County No 182.3 (137.9, 238.1) 38 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Pine County No 181.6 (156.8, 209.6) 39 (4, 82) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Aitkin County No 181.5 (153.1, 216.1) 40 (4, 84) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Winona County No 181.0 (159.4, 204.9) 41 (8, 80) 54 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Fillmore County No 180.1 (150.1, 214.9) 42 (3, 85) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lincoln County No 178.6 (126.1, 249.0) 43 (1, 87) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Red Lake County No 177.8 (115.9, 265.8) 44 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Blue Earth County No 176.5 (156.1, 198.9) 45 (10, 81) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Lyon County No 176.3 (146.5, 210.7) 46 (4, 85) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Chisago County No 175.9 (155.1, 198.7) 47 (10, 81) 55 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Marshall County No 175.0 (134.6, 225.8) 48 (1, 87) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Anoka County No 174.6 (165.6, 184.0) 49 (25, 68) 304 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Meeker County No 173.6 (145.8, 205.8) 50 (6, 86) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Wabasha County No 172.8 (145.5, 204.7) 51 (6, 85) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Jackson County No 172.7 (132.8, 222.5) 52 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Stearns County No 172.5 (160.1, 185.6) 53 (24, 74) 147 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Dodge County No 171.6 (138.2, 210.8) 54 (4, 87) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Cottonwood County No 171.6 (135.6, 216.0) 55 (2, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Clay County No 170.6 (150.1, 193.0) 56 (12, 83) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Watonwan County No 170.3 (130.2, 220.0) 57 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Douglas County No 170.2 (149.6, 193.4) 58 (14, 85) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Wright County No 170.2 (155.5, 185.8) 59 (20, 80) 106 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Mower County No 168.4 (146.2, 193.2) 60 (13, 85) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Beltrami County No 168.4 (146.0, 193.2) 61 (12, 85) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Ramsey County No 167.1 (160.0, 174.4) 62 (37, 74) 436 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.1)
Hubbard County No 164.2 (138.5, 194.4) 63 (11, 86) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Rice County No 163.6 (145.3, 183.7) 64 (21, 85) 60 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Otter Tail County No 161.6 (145.3, 179.5) 65 (24, 85) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hennepin County No 161.5 (156.8, 166.2) 66 (49, 75) 978 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Nicollet County No 160.7 (135.7, 189.1) 67 (13, 87) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Roseau County No 159.9 (125.1, 201.9) 68 (7, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Houston County No 158.9 (129.1, 194.3) 69 (8, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Steele County No 158.9 (136.2, 184.4) 70 (19, 86) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
McLeod County No 158.4 (136.3, 183.4) 71 (21, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Washington County No 157.9 (148.2, 168.1) 72 (44, 83) 209 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Koochiching County No 156.8 (124.6, 197.0) 73 (9, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Dakota County No 156.7 (148.9, 164.8) 74 (50, 83) 323 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Lake County No 156.7 (124.8, 197.1) 75 (8, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Kittson County No 155.4 (103.8, 231.1) 76 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Pope County No 155.0 (118.8, 200.2) 77 (7, 87) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Redwood County No 154.9 (124.2, 192.1) 78 (11, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Kandiyohi County No 154.9 (134.0, 178.2) 79 (27, 87) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Olmsted County No 152.3 (140.6, 164.8) 80 (49, 86) 128 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
Carver County No 151.1 (134.7, 168.9) 81 (36, 87) 68 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Scott County No 148.9 (134.7, 164.1) 82 (48, 87) 88 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Waseca County No 147.0 (116.5, 183.4) 83 (13, 87) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Todd County No 146.0 (122.2, 173.8) 84 (29, 87) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Pennington County No 144.4 (110.4, 186.2) 85 (12, 87) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Murray County No 132.6 (97.2, 180.0) 86 (16, 87) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Lac qui Parle County Yes 116.8 (81.8, 166.7) 87 (36, 87) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 9:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top