Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota No 125.0 (123.4, 126.7) N/A 4,694 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Chisago County No 150.4 (132.5, 170.2) 10 (2, 54) 53 stable stable trend 9.4 (-1.9, 22.0)
Nicollet County Yes 113.1 (94.0, 135.3) 73 (16, 86) 26 stable stable trend 4.3 (-5.6, 15.3)
Chippewa County No 175.1 (138.7, 219.7) 2 (1, 69) 19 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.7)
Wadena County No 166.8 (132.3, 208.8) 4 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Faribault County No 149.2 (119.2, 186.3) 11 (1, 80) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Pipestone County No 129.4 (95.7, 173.5) 44 (2, 86) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Wilkin County No 143.3 (97.2, 207.0) 17 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Grant County Yes 104.5 (64.2, 163.8) 83 (2, 86) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Lac qui Parle County No 158.6 (109.9, 224.9) 6 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Lyon County No 127.8 (104.0, 155.8) 48 (3, 85) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Clay County No 131.4 (114.7, 149.8) 35 (6, 80) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Clearwater County No 139.5 (100.6, 190.2) 20 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Dodge County Yes 106.5 (82.4, 135.8) 80 (9, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Douglas County No 144.2 (124.9, 166.1) 16 (3, 69) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Kittson County No 151.4 (98.1, 230.2) 7 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Pennington County No 145.9 (114.0, 184.9) 13 (1, 83) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Waseca County No 145.7 (117.8, 178.9) 14 (1, 80) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Cottonwood County No 131.9 (101.2, 171.2) 33 (2, 85) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Isanti County No 129.7 (110.9, 151.0) 43 (6, 81) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Nobles County No 131.8 (105.6, 162.9) 34 (3, 85) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Stevens County Yes 106.5 (71.1, 154.4) 79 (4, 86) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Mahnomen County No 203.6 (142.5, 284.6) 1 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Redwood County No 133.9 (104.1, 170.6) 29 (2, 85) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Sibley County No 160.9 (127.9, 200.8) 5 (1, 73) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Yellow Medicine County Yes 117.9 (85.9, 160.3) 64 (3, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Martin County No 151.2 (124.1, 183.5) 9 (1, 76) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
McLeod County Yes 121.3 (102.9, 142.3) 58 (11, 84) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Jackson County Yes 115.4 (83.0, 158.5) 69 (3, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Murray County Yes 108.4 (78.3, 150.2) 76 (5, 86) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Becker County Yes 118.2 (100.0, 139.3) 63 (13, 85) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Rice County No 131.0 (115.6, 148.2) 36 (8, 77) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Carlton County Yes 117.2 (99.1, 138.3) 67 (13, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Freeborn County Yes 119.6 (100.7, 141.5) 62 (12, 85) 33 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Le Sueur County No 128.7 (107.0, 153.8) 47 (5, 84) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Meeker County No 140.3 (116.7, 168.0) 19 (2, 80) 27 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Mower County No 133.6 (115.0, 154.7) 30 (6, 79) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Rock County No 124.7 (90.8, 169.2) 53 (2, 86) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Stearns County Yes 122.3 (112.5, 132.8) 57 (24, 77) 121 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Watonwan County No 146.8 (110.2, 193.1) 12 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Cass County No 135.9 (114.4, 160.9) 26 (4, 80) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Fillmore County No 126.8 (103.0, 155.3) 51 (4, 85) 23 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Kandiyohi County No 141.1 (122.0, 162.5) 18 (4, 72) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Morrison County No 129.2 (109.4, 152.0) 45 (5, 83) 34 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Pine County No 130.7 (110.3, 154.5) 39 (5, 81) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Winona County No 132.5 (114.7, 152.5) 32 (6, 78) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Wright County No 128.7 (117.2, 141.1) 46 (13, 73) 95 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Benton County No 130.3 (110.6, 152.7) 41 (5, 81) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Hubbard County No 138.0 (112.8, 168.2) 21 (2, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Mille Lacs County No 151.4 (127.2, 179.5) 8 (1, 66) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Otter Tail County Yes 116.3 (102.9, 131.2) 68 (22, 84) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
St. Louis County No 133.0 (124.6, 141.8) 31 (15, 61) 208 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Crow Wing County Yes 120.2 (107.1, 134.7) 61 (18, 82) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Aitkin County No 137.0 (109.8, 171.1) 24 (2, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Beltrami County No 130.6 (112.3, 151.2) 40 (6, 81) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Brown County Yes 114.8 (94.0, 139.6) 71 (12, 86) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Koochiching County No 137.5 (107.7, 175.5) 22 (2, 85) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Marshall County Yes 105.8 (73.8, 149.1) 81 (5, 86) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Wabasha County Yes 120.5 (98.4, 147.0) 60 (7, 85) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Houston County Yes 105.0 (82.7, 132.6) 82 (18, 86) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Itasca County No 135.1 (118.2, 154.2) 27 (5, 75) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Washington County Yes 122.3 (114.7, 130.4) 56 (28, 75) 198 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Anoka County No 130.0 (123.1, 137.2) 42 (19, 64) 273 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Blue Earth County Yes 115.2 (100.5, 131.6) 70 (21, 85) 48 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Dakota County No 123.1 (117.1, 129.4) 55 (31, 71) 323 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Goodhue County No 127.1 (111.0, 145.4) 50 (9, 80) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Renville County No 134.1 (104.4, 170.7) 28 (2, 85) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Scott County No 127.6 (115.9, 140.1) 49 (14, 74) 91 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Steele County Yes 111.9 (94.3, 132.1) 75 (21, 86) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Carver County Yes 101.7 (90.0, 114.6) 84 (54, 86) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Norman County No 123.3 (83.1, 179.5) 54 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Sherburne County Yes 117.9 (104.3, 132.9) 65 (21, 84) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Lake County No 136.3 (102.0, 180.8) 25 (1, 86) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Pope County Yes 107.8 (77.3, 148.2) 77 (5, 86) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Traverse County Yes 99.1 (57.5, 173.9) 86 (2, 86) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Kanabec County No 125.0 (97.6, 158.8) 52 (4, 86) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Lincoln County No 174.3 (122.9, 244.3) 3 (1, 83) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Olmsted County Yes 107.3 (98.5, 116.7) 78 (54, 85) 114 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Ramsey County No 130.9 (125.4, 136.5) 37 (20, 57) 456 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Todd County Yes 100.4 (80.6, 124.4) 85 (27, 86) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Roseau County Yes 112.3 (85.4, 146.1) 74 (6, 86) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Cook County Yes 117.3 (75.4, 180.7) 66 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Hennepin County Yes 120.7 (117.1, 124.3) 59 (43, 71) 934 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Swift County No 130.7 (93.3, 179.8) 38 (1, 86) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Big Stone County Yes 114.5 (75.8, 173.9) 72 (2, 86) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Polk County No 145.3 (123.4, 170.4) 15 (2, 72) 35 stable stable trend -7.1 (-22.5, 11.4)
Red Lake County No 137.2 (82.9, 219.5) 23 (1, 86) 4
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2024 11:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top