Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | *** | 146.4 (145.0, 147.8) | N/A | 9,326 |
falling 
|
-1.4 (-1.6, -1.3) |
| United States | *** | 153.4 (153.2, 153.6) | N/A | 505,697 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.2, -1.7) |
| Roseau County | *** | 123.2 (102.2, 147.7) | 87 (25, 87) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.1) |
| Olmsted County | *** | 125.0 (117.5, 132.8) | 86 (67, 87) | 218 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.0, -1.5) |
| Lake of the Woods County | *** | 127.4 (90.5, 178.9) | 85 (2, 87) | 8 |
stable 
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.1) |
| Carver County | *** | 127.8 (117.6, 138.7) | 84 (55, 87) | 122 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.1) |
| Todd County | *** | 131.0 (114.9, 149.1) | 83 (28, 87) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
| Houston County | *** | 131.1 (112.6, 152.3) | 82 (19, 87) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Stevens County | *** | 131.5 (102.8, 166.3) | 81 (4, 87) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
| Pope County | *** | 131.6 (107.2, 160.6) | 80 (7, 87) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
| Redwood County | *** | 132.8 (112.3, 156.8) | 79 (14, 87) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Steele County | *** | 134.0 (119.5, 149.9) | 78 (28, 87) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.1) |
| Murray County | *** | 134.4 (108.2, 166.6) | 77 (6, 87) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.3) |
| Marshall County | *** | 136.0 (110.1, 167.2) | 76 (5, 87) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Kanabec County | *** | 137.5 (116.4, 161.7) | 75 (9, 87) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.7) |
| Hennepin County | *** | 137.6 (134.6, 140.6) | 74 (57, 80) | 1,668 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.3, -1.7) |
| McLeod County | *** | 139.2 (124.8, 155.1) | 73 (19, 86) | 70 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.4, -0.1) |
| Dakota County | *** | 139.2 (134.2, 144.5) | 72 (48, 80) | 598 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| Otter Tail County | *** | 140.7 (129.9, 152.2) | 71 (27, 84) | 141 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Lac qui Parle County | *** | 141.3 (110.9, 179.4) | 70 (1, 87) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.6, -0.6) |
| Nicollet County | *** | 141.8 (125.6, 159.5) | 69 (12, 86) | 58 |
stable
|
8.1 (-6.0, 24.4) |
| Becker County | *** | 141.9 (126.9, 158.4) | 68 (16, 86) | 69 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Kittson County | *** | 141.9 (103.9, 192.0) | 67 (1, 87) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.1) |
| Blue Earth County | *** | 142.5 (130.0, 155.9) | 66 (20, 85) | 101 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Beltrami County | *** | 143.2 (128.1, 159.7) | 65 (14, 86) | 70 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Scott County | *** | 143.4 (133.5, 153.8) | 64 (24, 82) | 166 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.0) |
| Rice County | *** | 145.0 (132.9, 157.9) | 63 (17, 83) | 110 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -0.9) |
| Grant County | *** | 145.4 (111.0, 188.5) | 62 (1, 87) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-2.0, -0.1) |
| Lake County | *** | 145.7 (121.4, 174.7) | 61 (2, 87) | 29 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Washington County | *** | 146.1 (139.6, 152.8) | 60 (29, 74) | 397 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
| Stearns County | *** | 146.2 (138.1, 154.6) | 59 (26, 78) | 256 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.6) |
| Ramsey County | *** | 147.0 (142.2, 151.8) | 58 (34, 69) | 779 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.0, -1.5) |
| Waseca County | *** | 147.1 (126.1, 171.0) | 57 (3, 87) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Kandiyohi County | *** | 147.5 (133.2, 163.1) | 56 (11, 83) | 85 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Pennington County | *** | 147.6 (123.7, 175.3) | 55 (3, 87) | 29 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| Watonwan County | *** | 148.1 (121.0, 180.1) | 54 (2, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.9, 0.0) |
| Wabasha County | *** | 148.2 (130.3, 168.3) | 53 (6, 85) | 51 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Benton County | *** | 148.9 (133.0, 166.3) | 52 (7, 84) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Wright County | *** | 150.4 (140.9, 160.3) | 51 (15, 75) | 195 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Cook County | *** | 150.6 (113.4, 199.6) | 50 (1, 87) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.1, 0.7) |
| Yellow Medicine County | *** | 150.9 (122.9, 184.2) | 49 (1, 87) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.1) |
| Cottonwood County | *** | 151.3 (126.4, 180.6) | 48 (1, 87) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
| Mahnomen County | *** | 151.5 (105.0, 217.2) | 47 (1, 87) | 8 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.7, -0.6) |
| Clay County | *** | 151.8 (138.4, 166.2) | 46 (7, 79) | 99 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
| Fillmore County | *** | 152.0 (132.8, 173.6) | 45 (4, 84) | 50 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Anoka County | *** | 152.2 (146.3, 158.2) | 44 (20, 63) | 540 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
| Jackson County | *** | 152.2 (125.3, 184.1) | 43 (1, 87) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.5) |
| Traverse County | *** | 153.0 (112.8, 209.2) | 42 (1, 87) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.9, 1.1) |
| Sherburne County | *** | 153.3 (141.2, 166.1) | 41 (9, 76) | 127 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Chisago County | *** | 154.5 (140.9, 169.1) | 40 (7, 78) | 100 |
stable
|
6.6 (-7.9, 23.4) |
| Nobles County | *** | 155.3 (134.1, 179.3) | 39 (2, 84) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
| Dodge County | *** | 155.5 (133.4, 180.4) | 38 (2, 85) | 36 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
| Winona County | *** | 155.9 (141.9, 171.0) | 37 (5, 78) | 98 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Meeker County | *** | 156.4 (137.7, 177.2) | 36 (3, 83) | 54 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Renville County | *** | 156.4 (133.5, 182.6) | 35 (2, 86) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Freeborn County | *** | 156.5 (140.6, 174.0) | 34 (4, 79) | 78 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
| Goodhue County | *** | 156.6 (143.3, 171.0) | 33 (6, 74) | 108 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Carlton County | *** | 156.6 (140.6, 174.2) | 32 (4, 78) | 72 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Morrison County | *** | 156.6 (140.9, 173.8) | 31 (4, 78) | 76 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Norman County | *** | 156.8 (124.4, 196.9) | 30 (1, 87) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.9, 0.1) |
| Lyon County | *** | 156.8 (137.3, 178.5) | 29 (2, 82) | 50 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
| Isanti County | *** | 156.9 (141.1, 174.0) | 28 (4, 79) | 75 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
| Swift County | *** | 157.2 (128.5, 191.4) | 27 (1, 87) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| Clearwater County | *** | 157.2 (126.6, 194.2) | 26 (1, 87) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.1) |
| Cass County | *** | 157.2 (140.6, 175.8) | 25 (3, 80) | 75 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
| Big Stone County | *** | 157.7 (121.6, 204.0) | 24 (1, 87) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.8) |
| Mower County | *** | 157.7 (142.7, 174.1) | 23 (4, 76) | 89 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Crow Wing County | *** | 158.2 (147.0, 170.1) | 22 (6, 67) | 160 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Pipestone County | *** | 158.5 (130.4, 191.9) | 21 (1, 86) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.4) |
| Hubbard County | *** | 158.8 (139.5, 180.6) | 20 (2, 80) | 56 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Douglas County | *** | 159.2 (144.5, 175.1) | 19 (4, 74) | 96 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
| Aitkin County | *** | 159.5 (139.1, 183.4) | 18 (1, 81) | 55 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Brown County | *** | 159.6 (141.8, 179.3) | 17 (2, 77) | 66 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.0) |
| Koochiching County | *** | 161.0 (137.3, 188.7) | 16 (1, 83) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| St. Louis County | *** | 161.3 (154.5, 168.4) | 15 (8, 48) | 449 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Le Sueur County | *** | 163.0 (144.8, 183.0) | 14 (2, 75) | 60 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Rock County | *** | 163.5 (134.6, 197.7) | 13 (1, 85) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
| Pine County | *** | 165.9 (148.9, 184.7) | 12 (1, 70) | 73 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Red Lake County | *** | 167.6 (120.8, 228.5) | 11 (1, 87) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.9) |
| Polk County | *** | 169.7 (152.2, 188.8) | 10 (1, 64) | 74 |
stable
|
3.0 (-15.6, 25.9) |
| Lincoln County | *** | 170.3 (133.2, 216.3) | 9 (1, 87) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.8, 1.6) |
| Itasca County | *** | 172.0 (158.1, 187.0) | 8 (1, 52) | 123 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.8) |
| Martin County | *** | 172.4 (152.0, 195.2) | 7 (1, 67) | 59 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Faribault County | *** | 172.6 (148.1, 200.7) | 6 (1, 76) | 40 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.7, 0.5) |
| Sibley County | *** | 175.8 (150.5, 204.5) | 5 (1, 77) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
| Chippewa County | *** | 178.1 (150.9, 209.5) | 4 (1, 72) | 35 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.3, 1.5) |
| Wilkin County | *** | 186.3 (147.9, 232.9) | 3 (1, 83) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Wadena County | *** | 187.3 (161.2, 217.1) | 2 (1, 54) | 40 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
| Mille Lacs County | *** | 187.7 (167.2, 210.3) | 1 (1, 37) | 63 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2022 7:55 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2022 7:55 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.