Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota *** 146.4 (145.0, 147.8) N/A 9,326 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States *** 153.4 (153.2, 153.6) N/A 505,697 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Hennepin County *** 137.6 (134.6, 140.6) 74 (57, 80) 1,668 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Ramsey County *** 147.0 (142.2, 151.8) 58 (34, 69) 779 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Dakota County *** 139.2 (134.2, 144.5) 72 (48, 80) 598 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Anoka County *** 152.2 (146.3, 158.2) 44 (20, 63) 540 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
St. Louis County *** 161.3 (154.5, 168.4) 15 (8, 48) 449 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Washington County *** 146.1 (139.6, 152.8) 60 (29, 74) 397 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Stearns County *** 146.2 (138.1, 154.6) 59 (26, 78) 256 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Olmsted County *** 125.0 (117.5, 132.8) 86 (67, 87) 218 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Wright County *** 150.4 (140.9, 160.3) 51 (15, 75) 195 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Scott County *** 143.4 (133.5, 153.8) 64 (24, 82) 166 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Crow Wing County *** 158.2 (147.0, 170.1) 22 (6, 67) 160 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Otter Tail County *** 140.7 (129.9, 152.2) 71 (27, 84) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Sherburne County *** 153.3 (141.2, 166.1) 41 (9, 76) 127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Itasca County *** 172.0 (158.1, 187.0) 8 (1, 52) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Carver County *** 127.8 (117.6, 138.7) 84 (55, 87) 122 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Rice County *** 145.0 (132.9, 157.9) 63 (17, 83) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Goodhue County *** 156.6 (143.3, 171.0) 33 (6, 74) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Blue Earth County *** 142.5 (130.0, 155.9) 66 (20, 85) 101 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Chisago County *** 154.5 (140.9, 169.1) 40 (7, 78) 100 stable stable trend 6.6 (-7.9, 23.4)
Clay County *** 151.8 (138.4, 166.2) 46 (7, 79) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Winona County *** 155.9 (141.9, 171.0) 37 (5, 78) 98 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Douglas County *** 159.2 (144.5, 175.1) 19 (4, 74) 96 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Mower County *** 157.7 (142.7, 174.1) 23 (4, 76) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Kandiyohi County *** 147.5 (133.2, 163.1) 56 (11, 83) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Freeborn County *** 156.5 (140.6, 174.0) 34 (4, 79) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Morrison County *** 156.6 (140.9, 173.8) 31 (4, 78) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Isanti County *** 156.9 (141.1, 174.0) 28 (4, 79) 75 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Cass County *** 157.2 (140.6, 175.8) 25 (3, 80) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Polk County *** 169.7 (152.2, 188.8) 10 (1, 64) 74 stable stable trend 3.0 (-15.6, 25.9)
Pine County *** 165.9 (148.9, 184.7) 12 (1, 70) 73 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Carlton County *** 156.6 (140.6, 174.2) 32 (4, 78) 72 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
McLeod County *** 139.2 (124.8, 155.1) 73 (19, 86) 70 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Beltrami County *** 143.2 (128.1, 159.7) 65 (14, 86) 70 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Becker County *** 141.9 (126.9, 158.4) 68 (16, 86) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Benton County *** 148.9 (133.0, 166.3) 52 (7, 84) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Brown County *** 159.6 (141.8, 179.3) 17 (2, 77) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Steele County *** 134.0 (119.5, 149.9) 78 (28, 87) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Mille Lacs County *** 187.7 (167.2, 210.3) 1 (1, 37) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Le Sueur County *** 163.0 (144.8, 183.0) 14 (2, 75) 60 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Martin County *** 172.4 (152.0, 195.2) 7 (1, 67) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Nicollet County *** 141.8 (125.6, 159.5) 69 (12, 86) 58 stable stable trend 8.1 (-6.0, 24.4)
Hubbard County *** 158.8 (139.5, 180.6) 20 (2, 80) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Aitkin County *** 159.5 (139.1, 183.4) 18 (1, 81) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Meeker County *** 156.4 (137.7, 177.2) 36 (3, 83) 54 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Wabasha County *** 148.2 (130.3, 168.3) 53 (6, 85) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lyon County *** 156.8 (137.3, 178.5) 29 (2, 82) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Todd County *** 131.0 (114.9, 149.1) 83 (28, 87) 50 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Fillmore County *** 152.0 (132.8, 173.6) 45 (4, 84) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Nobles County *** 155.3 (134.1, 179.3) 39 (2, 84) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Wadena County *** 187.3 (161.2, 217.1) 2 (1, 54) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Faribault County *** 172.6 (148.1, 200.7) 6 (1, 76) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Houston County *** 131.1 (112.6, 152.3) 82 (19, 87) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Waseca County *** 147.1 (126.1, 171.0) 57 (3, 87) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Sibley County *** 175.8 (150.5, 204.5) 5 (1, 77) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Renville County *** 156.4 (133.5, 182.6) 35 (2, 86) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Dodge County *** 155.5 (133.4, 180.4) 38 (2, 85) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Koochiching County *** 161.0 (137.3, 188.7) 16 (1, 83) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Chippewa County *** 178.1 (150.9, 209.5) 4 (1, 72) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Kanabec County *** 137.5 (116.4, 161.7) 75 (9, 87) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Redwood County *** 132.8 (112.3, 156.8) 79 (14, 87) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Cottonwood County *** 151.3 (126.4, 180.6) 48 (1, 87) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lake County *** 145.7 (121.4, 174.7) 61 (2, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Pennington County *** 147.6 (123.7, 175.3) 55 (3, 87) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Jackson County *** 152.2 (125.3, 184.1) 43 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Roseau County *** 123.2 (102.2, 147.7) 87 (25, 87) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Pipestone County *** 158.5 (130.4, 191.9) 21 (1, 86) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Rock County *** 163.5 (134.6, 197.7) 13 (1, 85) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Pope County *** 131.6 (107.2, 160.6) 80 (7, 87) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Swift County *** 157.2 (128.5, 191.4) 27 (1, 87) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Watonwan County *** 148.1 (121.0, 180.1) 54 (2, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Yellow Medicine County *** 150.9 (122.9, 184.2) 49 (1, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Marshall County *** 136.0 (110.1, 167.2) 76 (5, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Murray County *** 134.4 (108.2, 166.6) 77 (6, 87) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Clearwater County *** 157.2 (126.6, 194.2) 26 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Lac qui Parle County *** 141.3 (110.9, 179.4) 70 (1, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Lincoln County *** 170.3 (133.2, 216.3) 9 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Norman County *** 156.8 (124.4, 196.9) 30 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Wilkin County *** 186.3 (147.9, 232.9) 3 (1, 83) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Big Stone County *** 157.7 (121.6, 204.0) 24 (1, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Stevens County *** 131.5 (102.8, 166.3) 81 (4, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Grant County *** 145.4 (111.0, 188.5) 62 (1, 87) 14 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Cook County *** 150.6 (113.4, 199.6) 50 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Kittson County *** 141.9 (103.9, 192.0) 67 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Traverse County *** 153.0 (112.8, 209.2) 42 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Red Lake County *** 167.6 (120.8, 228.5) 11 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Lake of the Woods County *** 127.4 (90.5, 178.9) 85 (2, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Mahnomen County *** 151.5 (105.0, 217.2) 47 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2022 10:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top