Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota *** 148.9 (147.5, 150.3) N/A 9,161 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States 6 *** 160.2 (160.0, 160.4) N/A 465,913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Wadena County *** 197.8 (170.6, 228.6) 1 (1, 40) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Wilkin County *** 186.4 (148.4, 232.7) 2 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Chippewa County *** 184.6 (156.8, 216.9) 3 (1, 69) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Mille Lacs County *** 184.2 (163.7, 206.9) 4 (1, 47) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Nobles County *** 175.1 (151.1, 202.7) 5 (1, 75) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Martin County *** 173.4 (153.1, 196.1) 6 (1, 68) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Faribault County *** 171.9 (147.5, 200.0) 7 (1, 77) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Itasca County *** 170.4 (156.5, 185.5) 8 (2, 54) 121 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Jackson County *** 170.3 (141.8, 203.9) 9 (1, 84) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Grant County *** 170.3 (133.2, 216.2) 10 (1, 87) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.3)
Pine County *** 168.8 (151.3, 188.1) 11 (1, 66) 71 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Aitkin County *** 168.8 (147.9, 193.0) 12 (1, 76) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Carlton County *** 168.7 (152.0, 187.1) 13 (1, 67) 76 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hubbard County *** 167.9 (147.9, 190.4) 14 (1, 75) 58 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Koochiching County *** 166.9 (142.5, 195.4) 15 (1, 83) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
St. Louis County *** 166.9 (159.8, 174.2) 16 (6, 41) 455 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Rock County *** 164.7 (135.5, 199.3) 17 (1, 86) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Polk County *** 164.2 (146.9, 183.2) 18 (2, 74) 70 rising rising trend 13.5 (3.8, 24.0)
Cass County *** 163.6 (146.6, 182.5) 19 (2, 73) 76 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Douglas County *** 162.8 (147.8, 179.1) 20 (3, 72) 96 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Clearwater County *** 162.4 (131.1, 200.1) 21 (1, 86) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Freeborn County *** 161.9 (145.4, 180.2) 22 (3, 77) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Sibley County *** 161.4 (137.3, 189.2) 23 (1, 84) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Meeker County *** 161.0 (141.7, 182.6) 24 (2, 78) 53 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Winona County *** 160.0 (145.5, 175.5) 25 (3, 74) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lincoln County *** 159.9 (124.4, 204.5) 26 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Goodhue County *** 159.9 (146.3, 174.6) 27 (5, 73) 109 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Crow Wing County *** 159.3 (147.9, 171.5) 28 (7, 67) 156 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Lyon County *** 158.8 (139.0, 181.0) 29 (2, 81) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Yellow Medicine County *** 158.5 (129.9, 192.5) 30 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wright County *** 158.3 (148.3, 168.7) 31 (9, 65) 196 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Isanti County *** 158.0 (142.0, 175.5) 32 (4, 78) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Anoka County *** 157.1 (151.0, 163.4) 33 (16, 56) 532 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Lake County *** 156.4 (130.1, 187.6) 34 (1, 86) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Brown County *** 156.0 (138.6, 175.5) 35 (4, 82) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Mower County *** 155.6 (140.4, 172.3) 36 (5, 79) 86 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cottonwood County *** 154.1 (127.9, 185.1) 37 (1, 87) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Clay County *** 153.5 (139.9, 168.2) 38 (8, 80) 97 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Kandiyohi County *** 153.4 (138.4, 169.8) 39 (7, 82) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Morrison County *** 153.4 (137.6, 170.6) 40 (5, 82) 73 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Le Sueur County *** 153.1 (135.3, 172.8) 41 (5, 84) 55 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Waseca County *** 152.9 (131.0, 177.9) 42 (3, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Watonwan County *** 152.4 (123.8, 187.2) 43 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Dodge County *** 151.6 (129.5, 176.4) 44 (3, 86) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Big Stone County *** 151.5 (116.4, 196.7) 45 (1, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Traverse County *** 151.5 (111.7, 207.3) 46 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Norman County *** 151.4 (118.5, 192.6) 47 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Sherburne County *** 150.1 (137.8, 163.1) 48 (13, 81) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Ramsey County *** 149.8 (145.0, 154.9) 49 (30, 67) 762 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Cook County *** 149.8 (111.4, 200.6) 50 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Wabasha County *** 149.5 (131.2, 170.1) 51 (6, 86) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Stearns County *** 148.9 (140.6, 157.5) 52 (23, 76) 253 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Otter Tail County *** 148.3 (137.2, 160.3) 53 (18, 80) 145 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Beltrami County *** 147.9 (132.3, 165.0) 54 (9, 85) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Renville County *** 147.8 (125.2, 174.2) 55 (3, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Chisago County *** 147.7 (134.3, 162.2) 56 (14, 83) 93 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Washington County *** 147.4 (140.7, 154.3) 57 (29, 76) 381 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Rice County *** 147.2 (134.8, 160.5) 58 (15, 82) 108 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Red Lake County *** 147.1 (103.0, 205.7) 59 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Mahnomen County *** 146.6 (100.9, 211.6) 60 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Stevens County *** 146.6 (116.9, 182.4) 61 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pipestone County *** 145.9 (118.6, 178.9) 62 (2, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Blue Earth County *** 145.1 (132.3, 158.9) 63 (18, 85) 101 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Fillmore County *** 145.1 (126.2, 166.4) 64 (7, 87) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Kittson County *** 144.7 (108.2, 193.2) 65 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Todd County *** 144.7 (127.4, 164.1) 66 (8, 87) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Becker County *** 143.7 (128.5, 160.5) 67 (14, 86) 69 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Scott County *** 143.4 (133.3, 154.1) 68 (28, 82) 157 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Kanabec County *** 143.1 (121.1, 168.4) 69 (5, 87) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Redwood County *** 141.9 (120.6, 166.5) 70 (7, 87) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Dakota County *** 141.6 (136.3, 147.0) 71 (45, 80) 577 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Steele County *** 141.4 (126.2, 158.0) 72 (18, 87) 67 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Benton County *** 141.1 (125.4, 158.3) 73 (15, 87) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Houston County *** 140.8 (121.4, 163.0) 74 (9, 87) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Swift County *** 140.4 (113.7, 172.8) 75 (4, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
McLeod County *** 140.0 (125.1, 156.4) 76 (22, 87) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Hennepin County *** 139.4 (136.3, 142.6) 77 (57, 79) 1,629 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Roseau County *** 137.8 (115.2, 164.1) 78 (7, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Nicollet County *** 133.7 (117.7, 151.4) 79 (27, 87) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Pennington County *** 132.8 (110.2, 159.3) 80 (13, 87) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pope County *** 131.0 (107.0, 159.7) 81 (10, 87) 24 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lac qui Parle County *** 130.2 (101.9, 166.3) 82 (5, 87) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Olmsted County *** 129.7 (121.9, 137.9) 83 (63, 87) 217 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Carver County *** 129.4 (118.9, 140.7) 84 (54, 87) 118 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Lake of the Woods County *** 127.7 (90.6, 179.6) 85 (2, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Marshall County *** 127.0 (101.3, 158.3) 86 (10, 87) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Murray County *** 126.9 (101.2, 158.8) 87 (9, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2021 7:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2018) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top