Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 167.2 (165.1, 169.2) N/A 5,326 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Anoka County Urban No 168.1 (159.5, 177.1) 60 (32, 73) 310 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Benton County Urban No 185.3 (158.7, 214.9) 30 (5, 80) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Blue Earth County Urban No 173.5 (153.6, 195.3) 48 (13, 81) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Carlton County Urban No 200.3 (174.1, 229.4) 12 (3, 68) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Carver County Urban No 149.0 (133.4, 165.8) 78 (42, 86) 73 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Chisago County Urban No 189.4 (168.1, 212.8) 28 (6, 69) 62 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Clay County Urban No 169.6 (149.5, 191.6) 56 (14, 84) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Dakota County Urban No 156.2 (148.6, 164.1) 73 (50, 81) 340 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Dodge County Urban No 164.7 (131.9, 203.2) 63 (7, 86) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Fillmore County Urban No 180.3 (151.0, 214.3) 34 (5, 84) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Hennepin County Urban No 157.7 (153.2, 162.3) 70 (52, 77) 981 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
Houston County Urban No 163.9 (134.1, 199.1) 66 (9, 86) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Isanti County Urban No 186.2 (161.5, 213.7) 29 (6, 79) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Le Sueur County Urban No 197.9 (168.4, 231.2) 18 (2, 74) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 249.6 (214.9, 288.4) 2 (1, 22) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Nicollet County Urban No 161.9 (137.4, 189.5) 67 (15, 85) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Olmsted County Urban No 147.3 (136.0, 159.3) 79 (54, 85) 130 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Polk County Urban No 228.5 (198.4, 262.2) 6 (1, 39) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Ramsey County Urban No 164.6 (157.6, 171.8) 64 (40, 74) 439 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -1.9)
Rock County Urban No 190.7 (146.3, 245.8) 26 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Scott County Urban No 146.3 (132.6, 160.9) 80 (49, 86) 92 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Sherburne County Urban No 182.1 (163.0, 202.7) 32 (9, 75) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
St. Louis County Urban No 181.2 (170.8, 192.1) 33 (16, 60) 244 falling falling trend -1.7 (-6.6, -1.3)
Stearns County Urban No 171.6 (159.3, 184.7) 53 (22, 74) 148 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Wabasha County Urban No 171.1 (143.7, 203.0) 55 (7, 85) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Washington County Urban No 151.5 (142.3, 161.1) 77 (53, 84) 215 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.4)
Wright County Urban No 168.4 (154.3, 183.5) 59 (22, 79) 113 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Aitkin County Rural No 177.5 (148.1, 213.4) 38 (6, 84) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Becker County Rural No 175.5 (152.3, 201.6) 43 (10, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Beltrami County Rural No 173.0 (150.2, 198.2) 49 (11, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Big Stone County Rural No 206.0 (145.0, 287.8) 9 (1, 86) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Brown County Rural No 207.7 (178.4, 241.0) 8 (2, 64) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Cass County Rural No 189.6 (165.6, 216.8) 27 (5, 76) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Chippewa County Rural No 198.3 (158.6, 246.1) 15 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Clearwater County Rural No 194.0 (146.7, 253.4) 21 (1, 85) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Cook County Rural Yes 111.1 (72.4, 170.2) 86 (28, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 9.3)
Cottonwood County Rural No 198.1 (158.9, 245.7) 16 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Crow Wing County Rural No 191.0 (173.9, 209.5) 24 (8, 61) 99 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Douglas County Rural No 155.7 (136.5, 177.2) 75 (27, 86) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Faribault County Rural No 192.0 (155.8, 235.2) 23 (2, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Freeborn County Rural No 176.6 (152.4, 203.9) 41 (8, 82) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Goodhue County Rural No 201.3 (179.2, 225.6) 10 (4, 58) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Grant County Rural No 197.8 (144.4, 267.7) 19 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 8.4)
Hubbard County Rural No 168.5 (142.2, 199.3) 58 (9, 85) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Itasca County Rural No 192.1 (171.6, 214.7) 22 (6, 67) 70 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 145.3 (110.0, 190.3) 81 (13, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Kanabec County Rural No 200.2 (164.6, 242.1) 13 (2, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.0)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 156.7 (136.0, 179.9) 71 (23, 86) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Kittson County Rural No 169.5 (114.8, 248.5) 57 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.3)
Koochiching County Rural No 156.5 (124.3, 196.8) 72 (10, 87) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 134.8 (95.8, 188.6) 85 (12, 87) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Lake County Rural No 199.9 (161.1, 247.4) 14 (1, 83) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 243.7 (156.3, 364.5) 5 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 216.9 (159.6, 291.7) 7 (1, 85) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Lyon County Rural No 171.6 (142.2, 205.5) 54 (8, 86) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -1.1)
Mahnomen County Rural No 176.3 (117.6, 256.2) 42 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Marshall County Rural No 200.3 (156.5, 254.6) 11 (1, 83) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Martin County Rural No 178.0 (149.4, 211.4) 37 (6, 84) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
McLeod County Rural No 159.5 (137.9, 183.9) 69 (19, 85) 40 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Meeker County Rural No 166.3 (139.0, 197.8) 61 (10, 86) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Morrison County Rural No 172.6 (149.2, 198.9) 50 (9, 84) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Mower County Rural No 155.5 (134.1, 179.6) 76 (22, 86) 39 falling falling trend -2.0 (-8.9, -1.3)
Murray County Rural Yes 106.4 (74.9, 150.3) 87 (57, 87) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Nobles County Rural No 172.0 (141.7, 207.1) 51 (6, 85) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Norman County Rural No 249.5 (190.2, 324.0) 3 (1, 70) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Otter Tail County Rural No 176.9 (159.8, 195.6) 39 (13, 76) 86 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Pennington County Rural No 179.9 (142.0, 225.5) 35 (3, 86) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Pine County Rural No 196.0 (170.3, 225.0) 20 (3, 71) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Pipestone County Rural No 198.1 (151.7, 255.6) 17 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Pope County Rural No 176.8 (137.4, 225.3) 40 (3, 86) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Red Lake County Rural No 174.8 (112.7, 263.8) 46 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Redwood County Rural No 164.1 (132.1, 202.6) 65 (8, 86) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Renville County Rural No 182.8 (148.1, 224.2) 31 (4, 85) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.6)
Rice County Rural No 160.3 (142.3, 179.9) 68 (25, 85) 60 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Roseau County Rural No 165.2 (130.1, 207.3) 62 (6, 86) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Sibley County Rural No 173.9 (137.2, 217.9) 47 (5, 86) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Steele County Rural No 156.1 (134.2, 180.9) 74 (20, 86) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Stevens County Rural No 144.1 (102.4, 197.7) 83 (7, 87) 8 falling falling trend -25.7 (-44.1, -0.5)
Swift County Rural No 143.5 (106.9, 190.4) 84 (10, 87) 11 falling falling trend -25.4 (-48.8, -1.6)
Todd County Rural No 145.3 (122.2, 172.0) 82 (32, 87) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Traverse County Rural No 262.1 (185.7, 366.9) 1 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Wadena County Rural No 247.6 (203.9, 298.6) 4 (1, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Waseca County Rural No 175.1 (142.1, 214.0) 44 (5, 86) 21 stable stable trend 14.0 (-2.3, 25.0)
Watonwan County Rural No 171.6 (132.5, 219.9) 52 (3, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Wilkin County Rural No 190.9 (137.5, 260.4) 25 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Winona County Rural No 175.0 (153.7, 198.7) 45 (11, 81) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 179.0 (135.1, 233.9) 36 (2, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 9:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top