Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota No 11.8 (11.4, 12.2) N/A 803 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.6, -2.3)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Polk County No 20.5 (14.7, 28.1) 4 (1, 37) 9 stable stable trend 19.7 (-5.3, 51.4)
Faribault County No 26.6 (17.2, 40.1) 2 (1, 29) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Nobles County No 17.2 (11.0, 26.0) 7 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Chippewa County No 25.7 (16.3, 39.6) 3 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Wadena County No 19.2 (11.2, 31.2) 6 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Hubbard County No 16.9 (10.8, 25.7) 8 (2, 56) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Wabasha County No 16.0 (10.5, 23.7) 11 (2, 56) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Carlton County No 14.1 (9.7, 20.1) 19 (4, 57) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Le Sueur County No 15.0 (9.9, 22.0) 14 (3, 57) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Stearns County No 12.3 (10.1, 14.8) 34 (12, 54) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Clay County No 14.8 (10.9, 19.7) 17 (4, 54) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Douglas County No 15.0 (10.8, 20.7) 13 (4, 55) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Koochiching County No 15.0 (8.8, 25.6) 15 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Becker County No 11.5 (7.6, 17.0) 40 (7, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Otter Tail County No 13.9 (10.6, 18.0) 23 (5, 54) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Renville County No 15.0 (8.8, 24.7) 16 (2, 57) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Anoka County No 12.0 (10.4, 13.7) 37 (18, 52) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Kandiyohi County No 14.1 (10.1, 19.3) 20 (4, 55) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Martin County No 16.0 (10.9, 23.6) 9 (2, 55) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Brown County No 16.0 (10.8, 23.2) 10 (2, 55) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Fillmore County No 14.8 (9.0, 23.2) 18 (2, 57) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.6)
Freeborn County No 13.7 (9.5, 19.6) 26 (4, 56) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
St. Louis County No 10.9 (9.1, 12.8) 47 (22, 56) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Blue Earth County No 11.1 (7.8, 15.2) 46 (10, 57) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Dakota County No 11.2 (9.8, 12.6) 44 (23, 54) 53 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8)
Winona County No 12.2 (8.6, 17.0) 35 (7, 57) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Benton County No 13.2 (8.9, 18.9) 29 (5, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Crow Wing County No 12.6 (9.6, 16.4) 33 (8, 56) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Cass County No 12.9 (8.3, 19.4) 31 (4, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Hennepin County No 10.4 (9.6, 11.2) 51 (34, 54) 144 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.2)
McLeod County No 10.8 (7.1, 16.0) 48 (9, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Rice County No 10.3 (7.4, 14.1) 52 (14, 57) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Goodhue County No 13.6 (10.0, 18.3) 27 (5, 56) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Meeker County No 13.9 (8.9, 21.3) 22 (3, 57) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.0)
Mille Lacs County No 13.9 (8.3, 21.8) 25 (3, 57) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.0)
Ramsey County No 11.2 (10.0, 12.5) 43 (25, 53) 69 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.3)
Itasca County No 12.0 (8.7, 16.5) 36 (8, 57) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.4)
Wright County No 11.2 (8.8, 14.1) 42 (15, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Aitkin County No 13.1 (6.9, 23.6) 30 (2, 57) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Carver County No 11.9 (9.0, 15.4) 38 (10, 57) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.6)
Olmsted County Yes 8.4 (6.6, 10.5) 57 (37, 57) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -1.9)
Washington County No 10.4 (8.8, 12.3) 50 (26, 57) 30 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Morrison County No 11.1 (7.3, 16.4) 45 (7, 57) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.3)
Scott County No 10.1 (7.7, 12.9) 53 (19, 57) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Beltrami County No 12.9 (8.8, 18.1) 32 (5, 57) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Steele County No 9.9 (6.3, 15.0) 55 (11, 57) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Nicollet County No 10.0 (6.2, 15.4) 54 (10, 57) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Sherburne County No 11.3 (8.3, 14.9) 41 (12, 57) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.2)
Mower County Yes 8.9 (5.8, 13.2) 56 (19, 57) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.3)
Chisago County No 13.9 (10.1, 18.7) 24 (5, 56) 9
*
*
Dodge County No 13.4 (7.6, 22.1) 28 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Isanti County No 10.7 (7.0, 15.9) 49 (10, 57) 5
*
*
Lyon County No 11.7 (6.8, 18.9) 39 (5, 57) 4
*
*
Pine County No 15.7 (11.0, 22.2) 12 (3, 55) 7
*
*
Sibley County No 30.9 (20.4, 45.1) 1 (1, 22) 6
*
*
Waseca County No 14.0 (8.0, 23.0) 21 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Yellow Medicine County No 20.4 (11.3, 35.2) 5 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Big Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/30/2023 11:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top