Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Pancreas, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota *** 11.0 (10.6, 11.3) N/A 761 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 44,868 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Wright County *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.7) 20 (4, 48) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Winona County *** 12.9 (9.3, 17.7) 8 (2, 51) 9
*
*
Washington County *** 9.5 (8.0, 11.2) 43 (18, 52) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Waseca County *** 14.7 (8.6, 23.9) 6 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.7)
Wabasha County *** 9.5 (5.5, 15.9) 44 (3, 53) 3
*
*
Todd County *** 11.9 (7.6, 18.3) 18 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Stevens County *** 30.6 (18.3, 48.8) 1 (1, 15) 4
*
*
Steele County *** 9.4 (5.9, 14.3) 46 (5, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Stearns County *** 9.3 (7.4, 11.5) 48 (15, 53) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
St. Louis County *** 10.6 (9.0, 12.5) 33 (11, 49) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Sherburne County *** 10.2 (7.4, 13.7) 39 (6, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Scott County *** 10.8 (8.4, 13.7) 30 (7, 51) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Rice County *** 12.1 (8.9, 16.1) 17 (3, 51) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Ramsey County *** 12.5 (11.2, 13.8) 15 (6, 33) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Polk County *** 17.2 (11.9, 24.1) 3 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.6)
Pine County *** 12.4 (8.2, 18.3) 16 (2, 53) 6
*
*
Otter Tail County *** 12.5 (9.6, 16.2) 14 (3, 49) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Olmsted County *** 10.3 (8.3, 12.6) 37 (9, 51) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Nobles County *** 11.8 (6.8, 19.4) 21 (2, 53) 3
*
*
Nicollet County *** 9.1 (5.5, 14.5) 50 (5, 53) 4
*
*
Mower County *** 8.0 (4.9, 12.5) 52 (10, 53) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.6)
Morrison County *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.4) 53 (15, 53) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.1)
Mille Lacs County *** 10.9 (6.7, 17.0) 28 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Meeker County *** 11.2 (6.7, 18.0) 25 (2, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
McLeod County *** 12.6 (8.7, 18.0) 11 (2, 52) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Martin County *** 12.6 (7.7, 20.0) 12 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Lyon County *** 16.2 (10.5, 24.2) 4 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Le Sueur County *** 10.9 (6.7, 17.0) 27 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Kandiyohi County *** 10.7 (7.3, 15.2) 31 (4, 53) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Itasca County *** 10.1 (7.0, 14.4) 40 (5, 53) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Isanti County *** 10.0 (6.3, 15.1) 41 (4, 53) 5
*
*
Hubbard County *** 16.2 (10.8, 24.1) 5 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Houston County *** 12.9 (7.3, 21.6) 9 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Hennepin County *** 10.9 (10.2, 11.8) 26 (15, 40) 152 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Goodhue County *** 10.3 (7.1, 14.8) 36 (5, 53) 7
*
*
Freeborn County *** 10.8 (7.1, 16.3) 29 (3, 53) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.1)
Faribault County *** 13.1 (7.4, 22.6) 7 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Douglas County *** 12.7 (8.9, 17.9) 10 (2, 52) 8
*
*
Dakota County *** 10.3 (9.0, 11.7) 38 (14, 48) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Crow Wing County *** 9.5 (7.0, 12.8) 45 (9, 53) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Clay County *** 11.2 (7.9, 15.5) 24 (3, 53) 8 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Chisago County *** 9.2 (6.2, 13.2) 49 (7, 53) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Chippewa County *** 17.7 (10.1, 29.7) 2 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Cass County *** 11.9 (7.7, 17.8) 19 (2, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Carver County *** 9.8 (7.2, 13.1) 42 (8, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Carlton County *** 10.4 (6.8, 15.6) 35 (4, 53) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Brown County *** 9.3 (5.6, 15.2) 47 (4, 53) 4
*
*
Blue Earth County *** 10.4 (7.3, 14.5) 34 (5, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.1)
Benton County *** 12.5 (8.3, 18.2) 13 (2, 53) 6
*
*
Beltrami County *** 11.5 (7.7, 16.6) 23 (3, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Becker County *** 10.6 (6.9, 15.8) 32 (4, 53) 6
*
*
Anoka County *** 11.7 (10.2, 13.4) 22 (7, 42) 46 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Aitkin County *** 9.0 (5.2, 16.8) 51 (4, 53) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.7)
Big Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 3:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top