Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 19.8 (19.0, 20.5) N/A 587 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 2.4)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Aitkin County Rural No 22.2 (13.8, 38.2) 19 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.2)
Anoka County Urban No 19.2 (16.2, 22.5) 29 (13, 39) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 11.7)
Beltrami County Rural No 25.7 (17.2, 36.9) 9 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Benton County Urban No 27.3 (17.4, 40.6) 5 (1, 40) 5
*
*
Blue Earth County Urban No 25.9 (18.5, 35.2) 7 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.4)
Brown County Rural No 23.9 (15.2, 36.5) 16 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Carlton County Urban No 21.3 (13.2, 32.6) 21 (2, 41) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Carver County Urban No 18.7 (13.2, 25.6) 31 (6, 41) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3)
Cass County Rural No 19.9 (12.7, 30.7) 26 (3, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.7)
Chisago County Urban No 27.2 (19.0, 37.6) 6 (1, 38) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.6)
Clay County Urban No 20.6 (13.9, 29.4) 24 (3, 41) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.9)
Crow Wing County Rural No 25.9 (19.7, 33.6) 8 (1, 34) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Dakota County Urban No 21.1 (18.3, 24.3) 22 (9, 35) 41 stable stable trend 8.2 (-0.1, 20.2)
Douglas County Rural Yes 16.7 (11.0, 25.0) 37 (8, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Freeborn County Rural No 19.6 (12.4, 30.2) 27 (3, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.7)
Goodhue County Rural No 22.7 (15.6, 32.2) 18 (2, 40) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Hennepin County Urban No 19.2 (17.6, 20.9) 28 (17, 36) 110 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.0)
Isanti County Urban No 30.5 (20.7, 43.3) 3 (1, 36) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Itasca County Rural Yes 16.1 (10.7, 23.8) 38 (11, 41) 6 falling falling trend -6.4 (-21.7, -3.6)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 24.5 (16.8, 34.7) 14 (1, 40) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Le Sueur County Urban No 37.0 (24.4, 53.9) 1 (1, 31) 6
*
*
Lyon County Rural No 24.2 (14.0, 39.1) 15 (1, 41) 3
*
*
McLeod County Rural Yes 16.7 (10.3, 26.1) 36 (7, 41) 4
*
*
Meeker County Rural No 25.2 (15.5, 39.5) 12 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Mille Lacs County Urban No 28.0 (16.7, 43.9) 4 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Mower County Rural No 23.2 (15.4, 33.7) 17 (1, 41) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.6)
Olmsted County Urban No 18.0 (14.2, 22.6) 33 (12, 41) 15 stable stable trend 8.8 (-3.6, 25.9)
Otter Tail County Rural Yes 15.7 (11.1, 22.0) 39 (13, 41) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.3)
Pine County Rural No 25.1 (16.1, 37.8) 13 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.4)
Polk County Urban No 25.5 (16.0, 38.7) 11 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -1.2)
Ramsey County Urban No 18.8 (16.4, 21.4) 30 (15, 38) 47 stable stable trend 7.4 (-2.6, 13.3)
Rice County Rural No 17.8 (12.1, 25.3) 34 (7, 41) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.6)
Scott County Urban Yes 12.8 (8.8, 17.8) 41 (24, 41) 7 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.9, -3.3)
Sherburne County Urban No 20.5 (14.1, 28.6) 25 (3, 41) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.7)
St. Louis County Urban No 20.7 (17.2, 24.7) 23 (9, 37) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.6)
Stearns County Urban No 21.6 (17.4, 26.7) 20 (6, 37) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -0.9)
Steele County Rural No 25.6 (17.2, 36.9) 10 (1, 39) 6 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.5, 23.4)
Waseca County Rural No 30.8 (18.1, 49.6) 2 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Washington County Urban No 18.7 (15.4, 22.4) 32 (13, 39) 24 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.6)
Winona County Rural Yes 14.4 (8.7, 22.7) 40 (13, 41) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.7)
Wright County Urban No 17.3 (12.7, 22.8) 35 (11, 41) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.2)
Becker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top