Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Prostate, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota No 19.6 (18.9, 20.3) N/A 571 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
United States No 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 31,337 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Hennepin County No 20.0 (18.3, 21.7) 24 (13, 34) 112 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.2)
Ramsey County No 17.4 (15.1, 19.9) 33 (19, 42) 43 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.6, -2.6)
Dakota County No 17.6 (15.0, 20.6) 30 (15, 43) 33 stable stable trend 10.4 (-2.5, 25.1)
St. Louis County No 22.9 (19.2, 27.1) 16 (4, 33) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Anoka County No 17.5 (14.6, 20.8) 31 (15, 44) 27 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.2)
Washington County No 21.4 (17.8, 25.5) 22 (6, 37) 25 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Stearns County No 22.5 (18.2, 27.6) 17 (4, 37) 19 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Olmsted County Yes 15.3 (11.7, 19.7) 42 (18, 45) 12 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.1, -2.7)
Crow Wing County No 26.5 (20.1, 34.5) 7 (1, 34) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Wright County Yes 15.4 (11.1, 20.8) 40 (15, 45) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.6)
Scott County No 17.0 (12.2, 22.9) 35 (9, 45) 9 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.7, -3.0)
Carver County No 19.7 (13.9, 27.0) 25 (4, 45) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Blue Earth County No 24.4 (17.1, 33.6) 11 (1, 42) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Sherburne County No 21.6 (14.9, 29.9) 21 (2, 44) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.5)
Otter Tail County Yes 15.4 (10.8, 21.8) 41 (12, 45) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.7, -2.3)
Rice County No 20.5 (14.3, 28.5) 23 (2, 45) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.4)
Mower County No 26.5 (18.2, 37.5) 6 (1, 41) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Chisago County No 21.7 (14.5, 31.1) 20 (2, 45) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Kandiyohi County No 21.9 (14.8, 31.6) 19 (1, 45) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Goodhue County No 18.1 (12.1, 26.5) 28 (4, 45) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.2)
Steele County No 25.6 (17.1, 37.2) 8 (1, 43) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Brown County No 27.5 (18.0, 41.1) 5 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Isanti County No 25.0 (16.3, 36.7) 9 (1, 44) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Itasca County Yes 15.2 (9.9, 22.7) 43 (12, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.0)
Douglas County No 17.4 (11.3, 26.1) 34 (5, 45) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Winona County No 17.4 (11.3, 26.0) 32 (5, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.7)
Carlton County No 23.5 (15.0, 35.3) 15 (1, 45) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Clay County Yes 16.9 (10.8, 25.1) 36 (5, 45) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.3)
Le Sueur County No 31.0 (19.6, 46.7) 1 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Martin County No 28.1 (17.8, 43.5) 4 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Polk County No 24.5 (15.6, 37.0) 10 (1, 44) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.7)
Cass County No 18.8 (11.8, 29.5) 27 (2, 45) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Mille Lacs County No 29.6 (18.5, 45.3) 2 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.0)
Benton County No 23.9 (14.7, 36.5) 12 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Freeborn County Yes 16.5 (10.1, 26.3) 37 (5, 45) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.6, -1.7)
Aitkin County No 19.7 (11.8, 35.2) 26 (1, 45) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Becker County Yes 14.8 (8.8, 24.0) 44 (9, 45) 4
*
*
McLeod County Yes 16.4 (9.8, 26.1) 38 (5, 45) 4
*
*
Meeker County No 23.6 (14.2, 37.8) 14 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Beltrami County Yes 15.6 (9.2, 24.7) 39 (7, 45) 4
*
*
Pine County No 18.0 (10.6, 29.1) 29 (3, 45) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.3)
Lyon County No 23.7 (13.7, 38.3) 13 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Waseca County No 29.1 (16.9, 47.6) 3 (1, 45) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Houston County No 22.2 (12.6, 37.8) 18 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Morrison County Yes 13.8 (7.8, 23.2) 45 (9, 45) 3 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.5)
Big Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 4:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top