Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A *** 5.6 (5.3, 5.8) N/A 391 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 1.5)
United States N/A *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 20,108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1)
Brown County Rural *** 9.1 (5.1, 15.3) 1 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 0.7)
Morrison County Rural *** 9.0 (5.7, 13.9) 2 (1, 28) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.2)
Wabasha County Urban *** 8.9 (5.0, 15.2) 3 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Le Sueur County Urban *** 8.7 (4.9, 14.5) 4 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Stearns County Urban *** 8.2 (6.4, 10.4) 5 (1, 19) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Goodhue County Rural *** 7.3 (4.7, 11.1) 6 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Blue Earth County Urban *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.6) 7 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Benton County Urban *** 7.2 (4.2, 11.6) 8 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.9)
Polk County Urban *** 7.2 (4.0, 12.1) 9 (1, 32) 3 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.2)
Isanti County Urban *** 7.1 (4.3, 11.4) 10 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Wright County Urban *** 6.5 (4.7, 8.8) 11 (2, 30) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.5)
Itasca County Rural *** 6.2 (4.0, 9.5) 12 (2, 32) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
McLeod County Rural *** 6.2 (3.6, 10.1) 13 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Becker County Rural *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.2) 14 (1, 32) 3
*
*
St. Louis County Urban *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.5) 15 (5, 29) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Crow Wing County Rural *** 5.9 (4.1, 8.6) 16 (3, 32) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.4)
Dakota County Urban *** 5.7 (4.8, 6.8) 17 (7, 29) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8)
Washington County Urban *** 5.7 (4.6, 7.1) 18 (6, 30) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.1)
Steele County Rural *** 5.7 (3.2, 9.5) 19 (2, 32) 3
*
*
Ramsey County Urban *** 5.6 (4.8, 6.6) 20 (8, 29) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-7.5, -2.1)
Beltrami County Rural *** 5.5 (3.1, 9.2) 21 (2, 32) 3
*
*
Hennepin County Urban *** 5.5 (4.9, 6.0) 22 (11, 28) 78 falling falling trend -2.6 (-7.3, -1.9)
Douglas County Rural *** 5.4 (3.2, 8.8) 23 (3, 32) 4
*
*
Sherburne County Urban *** 5.3 (3.3, 8.1) 24 (3, 32) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.1)
Scott County Urban *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.3) 25 (6, 32) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.7, 0.1)
Kandiyohi County Rural *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.4) 26 (3, 32) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Clay County Urban *** 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 27 (3, 32) 3
*
*
Winona County Rural *** 4.9 (2.7, 8.3) 28 (3, 32) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Olmsted County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 29 (9, 32) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Anoka County Urban *** 4.6 (3.6, 5.6) 30 (14, 32) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.1)
Carver County Urban *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.6) 31 (8, 32) 5 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.6, -3.2)
Otter Tail County Rural *** 3.7 (2.2, 5.9) 32 (14, 32) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.7)
Aitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chisago County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Freeborn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mille Lacs County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mower County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rice County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2025 1:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top