Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Prostate, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 21.8?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota Yes 19.9 (19.1, 20.7) 503 falling falling trend -3.5 (-3.9, -3.2)
United States Yes 19.5 (19.4, 19.6) 28,017 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Hennepin County Yes 20.1 (18.3, 22.0) 97 stable stable trend 5.2 (-8.7, 21.3)
Goodhue County No 22.7 (15.6, 32.2) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Morrison County No 32.9 (22.6, 46.7) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.1)
Cass County Yes 21.1 (12.9, 33.2) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
Renville County No 32.5 (19.5, 52.5) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Blue Earth County No 23.2 (15.9, 32.6) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Itasca County Yes 20.0 (13.7, 28.6) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 1.0)
Redwood County No 30.9 (18.6, 49.9) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Douglas County Yes 15.6 (9.6, 24.4) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
St. Louis County No 25.1 (21.2, 29.7) 29 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Crow Wing County Yes 17.9 (12.6, 24.8) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Kandiyohi County Yes 19.0 (12.2, 28.6) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Mille Lacs County No 23.9 (14.1, 38.2) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.0, 0.0)
Sherburne County Yes 20.7 (13.5, 29.8) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 0.0)
Carlton County No 26.5 (16.8, 39.7) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Mower County No 28.7 (19.8, 40.4) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Stearns County Yes 19.7 (15.3, 24.8) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Rice County No 24.4 (16.9, 33.9) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.9)
Ramsey County Yes 19.0 (16.5, 21.8) 42 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.5)
Otter Tail County Yes 16.9 (11.8, 23.7) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.5)
Fillmore County No 26.8 (16.3, 42.4) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.4)
Wright County No 24.8 (18.6, 32.3) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.1)
Washington County Yes 18.0 (14.2, 22.3) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.0)
Freeborn County Yes 14.9 (8.7, 24.6) 3 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -0.8)
Todd County Yes 20.1 (11.4, 33.4) 3 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.6)
Polk County No 22.5 (13.7, 35.0) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.8)
Winona County Yes 21.6 (14.2, 31.6) 5 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.0)
Anoka County Yes 18.9 (15.3, 22.9) 21 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -2.7)
Chisago County Yes 21.6 (14.0, 31.8) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -1.6)
Dakota County Yes 16.0 (13.2, 19.1) 24 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.9, -3.1)
Isanti County Yes 20.1 (11.8, 31.9) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.1)
Olmsted County Yes 15.3 (11.5, 20.1) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.0, -2.8)
Clay County Yes 15.7 (9.7, 24.0) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.6, -2.3)
Pine County Yes 19.9 (11.7, 31.9) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.1, -1.9)
Carver County Yes 15.4 (9.6, 23.2) 4 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.8, -2.8)
Scott County Yes 14.3 (9.2, 21.0) 5 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.0, -3.1)
Becker County Yes 18.7 (11.1, 29.8) 4
*
*
Beltrami County Yes 20.3 (12.6, 30.8) 4
*
*
Benton County Yes 21.7 (13.0, 33.8) 4
*
*
Houston County No 27.7 (16.3, 45.1) 4
*
*
McLeod County Yes 19.4 (11.8, 30.2) 4
*
*
Meeker County No 23.8 (13.9, 38.7) 3
*
*
Wadena County No 32.1 (18.3, 53.7) 3
*
*
Aitkin County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Le Sueur County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/17/2019 7:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top