Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 978.7 (965.9, 991.7) N/A 4,542 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.8)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Choctaw County Rural No 635.5 (482.4, 821.7) 81 (49, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Kemper County Rural No 637.9 (487.4, 820.4) 80 (55, 81) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.6)
Amite County Rural No 729.2 (599.0, 879.4) 79 (45, 81) 22 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -1.9)
Greene County Rural No 732.7 (572.9, 923.0) 78 (35, 81) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Rankin County Urban No 749.8 (701.3, 800.7) 77 (64, 81) 181 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 4.3)
Lamar County Urban No 755.7 (675.4, 842.9) 76 (55, 81) 66 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 792.8 (645.7, 963.6) 75 (30, 81) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Lauderdale County Rural No 797.4 (728.9, 870.7) 74 (51, 80) 101 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -1.8)
Jones County Rural No 811.1 (738.1, 889.2) 73 (49, 79) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 819.7 (617.8, 1,066.1) 72 (11, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 820.8 (719.8, 932.0) 71 (37, 80) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Noxubee County Rural No 822.5 (639.3, 1,041.6) 70 (13, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Walthall County Rural No 833.9 (683.7, 1,007.2) 69 (18, 81) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Carroll County Rural No 839.6 (680.8, 1,024.5) 68 (17, 81) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-7.1, -0.6)
Winston County Rural No 841.8 (712.7, 987.4) 67 (25, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Smith County Rural No 857.1 (711.3, 1,024.1) 66 (19, 81) 24 falling falling trend -3.4 (-18.8, -1.0)
Itawamba County Rural No 860.3 (738.3, 996.7) 65 (26, 80) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 869.9 (712.8, 1,050.9) 64 (13, 81) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Marion County Rural No 876.0 (755.1, 1,010.7) 63 (22, 79) 38 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.9, -1.2)
Simpson County Urban No 884.4 (764.6, 1,017.6) 62 (20, 79) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Clarke County Rural No 890.3 (745.2, 1,055.0) 61 (15, 80) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Tippah County Rural No 894.9 (760.9, 1,045.7) 60 (16, 80) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Copiah County Urban No 899.0 (782.6, 1,027.7) 59 (20, 78) 44 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Hinds County Urban No 899.1 (853.0, 947.0) 58 (41, 69) 296 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Alcorn County Rural No 901.4 (798.1, 1,014.2) 57 (21, 77) 56 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.7, -0.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 902.0 (677.7, 1,175.9) 56 (4, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Hancock County Urban No 911.2 (823.8, 1,005.2) 55 (26, 74) 82 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 913.5 (740.0, 1,115.5) 54 (8, 80) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Newton County Rural No 913.7 (776.4, 1,068.0) 53 (12, 79) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Franklin County Rural No 916.4 (714.2, 1,158.0) 52 (4, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Lafayette County Rural No 916.4 (813.7, 1,028.3) 51 (19, 77) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Scott County Urban No 922.9 (795.6, 1,064.8) 50 (14, 78) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Pike County Rural No 930.7 (828.7, 1,041.9) 49 (19, 74) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Chickasaw County Rural No 940.2 (790.7, 1,109.9) 48 (8, 79) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Neshoba County Rural No 940.8 (816.5, 1,078.6) 47 (12, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Yalobusha County Rural No 947.4 (780.4, 1,139.3) 46 (7, 79) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Monroe County Rural No 959.4 (856.0, 1,071.9) 45 (14, 72) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Prentiss County Rural No 964.7 (838.8, 1,104.2) 44 (10, 75) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 966.7 (822.8, 1,128.5) 43 (9, 78) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Warren County Rural No 986.7 (886.4, 1,095.3) 42 (13, 68) 73 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Webster County Rural No 997.1 (799.3, 1,229.0) 41 (2, 79) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Jasper County Rural No 1,005.8 (856.3, 1,173.9) 40 (5, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Wayne County Rural No 1,018.6 (868.8, 1,186.7) 39 (4, 73) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Stone County Urban No 1,024.5 (853.9, 1,218.7) 38 (3, 77) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.3)
Lowndes County Rural No 1,026.6 (936.6, 1,122.9) 37 (10, 60) 98 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Jackson County Urban No 1,030.3 (969.9, 1,093.5) 36 (15, 52) 225 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Leake County Rural No 1,033.1 (886.9, 1,196.4) 35 (4, 73) 37 falling falling trend -2.2 (-12.5, -0.4)
Wilkinson County Rural No 1,034.7 (813.5, 1,297.6) 34 (1, 79) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
DeSoto County Urban No 1,048.1 (987.8, 1,111.0) 33 (12, 49) 235 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 1,050.1 (859.8, 1,269.9) 32 (2, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Forrest County Urban No 1,050.2 (963.3, 1,142.9) 31 (8, 56) 109 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 1,050.3 (999.0, 1,103.5) 30 (13, 46) 324 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.9, -0.8)
Panola County Rural No 1,054.6 (933.1, 1,187.4) 29 (5, 65) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-5.4, -0.1)
Claiborne County Rural No 1,057.2 (830.3, 1,326.5) 28 (1, 78) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adams County Rural No 1,058.6 (940.4, 1,187.3) 27 (5, 64) 60 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 5.5)
Washington County Rural No 1,069.9 (961.5, 1,187.2) 26 (4, 58) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Perry County Urban No 1,075.4 (882.8, 1,297.5) 25 (2, 75) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Lee County Rural No 1,084.2 (1,001.2, 1,172.2) 24 (6, 48) 128 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.5, 1.6)
Pearl River County Rural No 1,084.5 (995.1, 1,179.8) 23 (6, 49) 112 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Tishomingo County Rural No 1,088.3 (943.8, 1,248.7) 22 (2, 65) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Union County Rural No 1,089.9 (956.4, 1,236.7) 21 (3, 60) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Tate County Urban No 1,101.2 (962.5, 1,254.1) 20 (2, 59) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Grenada County Rural No 1,105.4 (957.7, 1,269.3) 19 (2, 62) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-8.1, -0.3)
Pontotoc County Rural No 1,108.0 (973.1, 1,256.4) 18 (2, 57) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Coahoma County Rural No 1,116.7 (958.8, 1,293.5) 17 (1, 64) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
George County Rural No 1,121.6 (955.0, 1,308.5) 16 (1, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,125.2 (1,003.6, 1,257.5) 15 (2, 52) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Covington County Rural No 1,128.1 (963.5, 1,312.7) 14 (1, 64) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 1.0)
Lawrence County Rural No 1,140.9 (941.0, 1,370.2) 13 (1, 70) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Marshall County Urban No 1,151.2 (1,029.5, 1,283.3) 12 (2, 47) 67 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Humphreys County Rural No 1,153.1 (907.9, 1,444.5) 11 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Quitman County Rural No 1,161.3 (881.3, 1,501.7) 10 (1, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Sunflower County Rural No 1,163.8 (1,009.3, 1,335.4) 9 (1, 52) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Attala County Rural No 1,172.8 (1,013.2, 1,350.3) 8 (1, 54) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Tunica County Urban No 1,180.4 (901.6, 1,518.3) 7 (1, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Bolivar County Rural No 1,183.0 (1,046.6, 1,332.2) 6 (1, 46) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Madison County Urban No 1,208.4 (1,127.8, 1,293.1) 5 (2, 26) 174 falling falling trend -4.7 (-5.4, -4.0)
Sharkey County Rural No 1,273.0 (936.3, 1,693.9) 4 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.2)
Leflore County Rural No 1,312.7 (1,154.6, 1,486.4) 3 (1, 28) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Holmes County Urban No 1,344.0 (1,148.2, 1,563.4) 2 (1, 31) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Yazoo County Urban No 1,387.9 (1,216.4, 1,576.8) 1 (1, 21) 48 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 14.6)
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top