Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A Yes 20.6 (19.7, 21.6) N/A 361 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 6.4)
United States N/A Yes 14.4 (14.4, 14.5) N/A 29,194 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Madison County Urban Yes 13.5 (9.9, 18.0) 40 (27, 42) 9 falling falling trend -5.6 (-21.7, -3.0)
Lauderdale County Rural Yes 20.1 (14.5, 27.1) 31 (6, 40) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-9.4, -1.9)
Lamar County Urban Yes 14.9 (10.1, 21.1) 39 (19, 42) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-18.6, -0.8)
Lafayette County Rural Yes 11.8 (7.0, 18.6) 41 (24, 42) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.5)
Rankin County Urban Yes 11.5 (8.7, 14.8) 42 (34, 42) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Pike County Rural Yes 18.9 (11.7, 28.8) 33 (4, 42) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.4)
Hancock County Urban Yes 19.1 (12.4, 28.3) 32 (5, 42) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.7)
Bolivar County Rural Yes 21.5 (12.9, 33.5) 23 (2, 42) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.7)
Jones County Rural Yes 20.9 (15.0, 28.3) 26 (4, 40) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Harrison County Urban Yes 17.3 (14.1, 20.9) 37 (20, 41) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Yazoo County Urban Yes 20.2 (11.9, 32.0) 30 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.0)
Itawamba County Rural Yes 22.9 (13.2, 36.7) 21 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.4)
Panola County Rural Yes 20.2 (12.2, 31.4) 29 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.6)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 17.3 (10.4, 27.0) 36 (7, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.4)
Marshall County Urban Yes 21.4 (13.0, 32.9) 25 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Union County Rural Yes 24.9 (15.4, 38.0) 17 (1, 41) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.7)
Alcorn County Rural Yes 22.8 (14.6, 33.9) 22 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.4)
DeSoto County Urban Yes 17.3 (14.1, 20.9) 38 (20, 41) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Jackson County Urban Yes 18.6 (14.8, 23.0) 34 (15, 40) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.2)
George County Rural Yes 21.4 (12.2, 34.8) 24 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Leake County Rural Yes 26.1 (15.1, 41.7) 14 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Pearl River County Rural Yes 28.5 (20.8, 38.2) 4 (1, 33) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Washington County Rural Yes 27.9 (19.2, 39.1) 8 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.2)
Sunflower County Rural Yes 20.8 (12.1, 33.4) 27 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.7)
Forrest County Urban Yes 23.9 (17.7, 31.4) 19 (2, 38) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Monroe County Rural Yes 27.1 (17.6, 39.6) 12 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Pontotoc County Rural Yes 23.0 (14.2, 35.0) 20 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2)
Leflore County Rural Yes 25.2 (15.1, 39.0) 16 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Warren County Rural Yes 28.3 (19.9, 39.0) 7 (1, 35) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 0.9)
Lee County Rural Yes 26.0 (20.1, 33.0) 15 (2, 32) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Lowndes County Rural Yes 27.7 (20.2, 36.9) 9 (1, 34) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Copiah County Urban Yes 28.4 (17.8, 42.8) 6 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Neshoba County Rural Yes 28.4 (18.2, 42.2) 5 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Adams County Rural Yes 27.1 (17.2, 40.7) 11 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1)
Coahoma County Rural Yes 33.5 (19.8, 52.4) 1 (1, 38) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Hinds County Urban Yes 20.4 (17.1, 24.2) 28 (12, 37) 26 rising rising trend 14.2 (5.8, 27.8)
Oktibbeha County Rural Yes 18.5 (11.2, 28.4) 35 (4, 42) 4
*
*
Prentiss County Rural Yes 26.8 (16.1, 41.7) 13 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Simpson County Urban Yes 24.6 (14.5, 38.7) 18 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Stone County Urban Yes 31.0 (18.0, 49.6) 2 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Tippah County Rural Yes 27.4 (15.9, 43.6) 10 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Wayne County Rural Yes 29.7 (17.3, 47.4) 3 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grenada County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tate County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 11:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top