Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Mississippi N/A No 174.6 (172.2, 177.0) N/A 4,332 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Jasper County Rural No 204.8 (167.5, 249.2) 12 (1, 70) 25 stable stable trend 16.1 (-0.5, 27.7)
Yazoo County Urban No 244.3 (209.2, 284.6) 4 (1, 31) 36 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 15.7)
Union County Rural No 200.2 (177.8, 224.9) 20 (4, 57) 60 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 11.0)
Lowndes County Rural No 190.5 (172.1, 210.6) 29 (7, 60) 85 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 8.3)
Kemper County Rural No 183.3 (126.7, 260.3) 37 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 12.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 177.5 (154.3, 203.7) 44 (9, 74) 45 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 3.8)
Covington County Rural No 200.0 (170.3, 234.2) 21 (2, 67) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Leflore County Rural No 250.1 (208.5, 299.4) 2 (1, 36) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Prentiss County Rural No 189.6 (167.2, 214.4) 30 (6, 65) 55 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Hinds County Urban No 146.7 (135.6, 158.8) 72 (53, 78) 142 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.9)
Lawrence County Rural No 217.5 (179.1, 262.6) 7 (1, 63) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Pontotoc County Rural No 208.3 (185.5, 233.4) 10 (3, 49) 63 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Sunflower County Rural No 203.7 (165.9, 249.5) 15 (1, 71) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Carroll County Rural No 175.4 (140.8, 218.0) 45 (4, 79) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Clarke County Rural No 150.2 (124.1, 181.1) 71 (23, 80) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Holmes County Urban No 207.6 (148.9, 289.1) 11 (1, 79) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Marshall County Urban No 226.9 (201.0, 255.8) 6 (1, 34) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Adams County Rural No 192.6 (164.8, 225.0) 27 (4, 69) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Perry County Urban No 200.7 (166.8, 240.4) 18 (2, 70) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Walthall County Rural No 163.9 (133.4, 200.8) 57 (9, 80) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Attala County Rural No 199.1 (169.5, 233.5) 22 (2, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Monroe County Rural No 177.9 (158.4, 199.4) 43 (12, 69) 65 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Quitman County Rural No 259.0 (175.0, 379.7) 1 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 188.6 (147.0, 241.3) 31 (1, 78) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Benton County Urban No 171.5 (129.8, 224.4) 51 (3, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.2)
Coahoma County Rural No 167.9 (131.3, 215.8) 54 (4, 80) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Grenada County Rural No 204.2 (175.3, 237.3) 14 (2, 62) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Tate County Urban No 202.8 (178.1, 230.3) 16 (3, 56) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Washington County Rural No 180.4 (152.9, 212.5) 40 (5, 75) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Wayne County Rural No 180.6 (153.0, 212.4) 39 (5, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Bolivar County Rural No 184.3 (154.4, 219.0) 35 (4, 74) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Simpson County Urban No 173.8 (150.0, 200.7) 48 (9, 75) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Tippah County Rural No 160.0 (137.5, 185.5) 59 (21, 79) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Webster County Rural No 197.7 (161.7, 240.2) 24 (2, 72) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Clay County Rural No 167.5 (136.0, 206.0) 55 (7, 79) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Marion County Rural No 173.9 (150.5, 200.4) 47 (11, 75) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Tishomingo County Rural No 212.3 (187.7, 239.7) 9 (2, 49) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Tunica County Urban No 245.7 (166.4, 355.7) 3 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Wilkinson County Rural No 179.5 (127.4, 253.5) 41 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Yalobusha County Rural No 196.1 (162.0, 236.8) 25 (2, 72) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Alcorn County Rural No 171.2 (153.6, 190.5) 52 (19, 72) 72 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Chickasaw County Rural No 194.7 (161.9, 233.2) 26 (2, 72) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Forrest County Urban No 186.0 (170.2, 202.9) 32 (11, 60) 107 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
George County Rural No 213.1 (186.4, 242.5) 8 (1, 50) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Panola County Rural No 204.3 (180.0, 231.6) 13 (2, 54) 55 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pearl River County Rural No 197.8 (182.6, 214.1) 23 (7, 48) 135 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Pike County Rural No 165.3 (144.5, 188.8) 56 (19, 76) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 156.1 (119.9, 202.4) 66 (7, 80) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Hancock County Urban No 168.3 (153.7, 184.2) 53 (24, 71) 106 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Humphreys County Rural No 229.2 (149.9, 345.6) 5 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.7)
Itawamba County Rural No 173.4 (152.4, 196.8) 50 (13, 74) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 173.6 (153.9, 195.5) 49 (14, 72) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 158.3 (121.7, 204.8) 61 (6, 80) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Scott County Urban No 156.3 (133.0, 183.1) 65 (24, 80) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Warren County Rural No 175.0 (155.2, 197.0) 46 (13, 71) 61 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
DeSoto County Urban No 182.6 (172.8, 192.8) 38 (19, 55) 267 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Sharkey County Rural No 183.6 (101.3, 329.3) 36 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 0.9)
Stone County Urban No 201.3 (171.5, 235.0) 17 (2, 65) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Copiah County Urban No 153.8 (130.4, 181.1) 69 (26, 80) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.0)
Greene County Rural No 156.3 (127.1, 190.9) 64 (14, 80) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Jackson County Urban No 185.2 (175.0, 195.9) 33 (16, 53) 256 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 155.5 (117.6, 205.7) 67 (6, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Jones County Rural No 155.3 (141.8, 169.9) 68 (43, 77) 103 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Winston County Rural No 159.0 (131.2, 192.2) 60 (15, 80) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Choctaw County Rural No 145.2 (111.8, 187.5) 73 (17, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Claiborne County Rural No 144.5 (86.3, 285.4) 74 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Harrison County Urban No 191.1 (182.2, 200.3) 28 (14, 47) 366 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.8)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 140.2 (120.5, 162.3) 75 (44, 80) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Lafayette County Rural No 136.4 (120.8, 153.6) 77 (56, 80) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Lamar County Urban No 139.2 (126.1, 153.5) 76 (58, 80) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.7)
Newton County Rural No 156.6 (132.0, 185.1) 62 (19, 80) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Noxubee County Rural No 125.8 (83.1, 188.0) 79 (13, 80) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.2)
Lauderdale County Rural No 153.1 (139.0, 168.4) 70 (41, 77) 94 falling falling trend -2.1 (-5.4, -1.4)
Rankin County Urban No 127.9 (120.1, 136.2) 78 (70, 80) 205 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.4, -0.9)
Amite County Rural No 122.9 (97.8, 154.6) 80 (51, 80) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-6.4, -1.7)
Lee County Rural No 200.6 (186.2, 215.9) 19 (6, 44) 149 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.4, 3.2)
Leake County Rural No 179.1 (150.3, 212.6) 42 (6, 76) 30 falling falling trend -3.2 (-13.4, -0.9)
Smith County Rural No 156.5 (130.0, 187.6) 63 (19, 80) 26 falling falling trend -3.7 (-30.1, -1.1)
Madison County Urban No 184.4 (171.3, 198.3) 34 (14, 58) 153 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.2, -4.0)
Calhoun County Rural No 160.3 (130.7, 195.8) 58 (10, 80) 22 falling falling trend -5.7 (-16.5, -0.5)
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top