Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank ascending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A *** 12.3 (11.8, 12.9) N/A 458 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.7)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Lafayette County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.0) 42 (24, 42) 4
*
*
Union County Rural *** 9.4 (5.3, 15.6) 41 (8, 42) 3
*
*
Rankin County Urban *** 9.7 (7.8, 11.9) 40 (20, 42) 19 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.9)
Alcorn County Rural *** 9.8 (6.3, 14.9) 39 (10, 42) 5
*
*
Jackson County Urban *** 10.3 (8.3, 12.6) 38 (18, 42) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.1)
Copiah County Urban *** 10.4 (6.2, 16.5) 37 (6, 42) 4
*
*
Pike County Rural *** 10.5 (6.9, 15.4) 36 (9, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.2)
Tate County Urban *** 10.5 (6.3, 16.7) 35 (6, 42) 4
*
*
Lee County Rural *** 10.6 (7.9, 14.0) 34 (12, 42) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 3.0)
Hancock County Urban *** 10.7 (7.6, 14.9) 33 (10, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.6)
Leflore County Rural *** 10.8 (6.2, 17.5) 32 (5, 42) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.5)
Adams County Rural *** 11.4 (7.4, 17.2) 31 (5, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Warren County Rural *** 11.4 (7.8, 16.3) 30 (7, 42) 7
*
*
Lamar County Urban *** 11.5 (8.3, 15.7) 29 (8, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 3.2)
DeSoto County Urban *** 11.7 (9.6, 14.1) 28 (12, 40) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.6)
Sunflower County Rural *** 11.8 (6.8, 19.2) 27 (3, 42) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Jones County Rural *** 12.0 (8.8, 16.0) 26 (8, 41) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.5)
Forrest County Urban *** 12.2 (9.0, 16.1) 25 (7, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Hinds County Urban *** 12.2 (10.4, 14.3) 24 (12, 38) 32 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Lowndes County Rural *** 12.4 (9.1, 16.6) 23 (6, 41) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.7)
Marshall County Urban *** 12.5 (8.3, 18.3) 22 (5, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.5)
Lauderdale County Rural *** 12.6 (9.6, 16.4) 21 (7, 41) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.1)
Harrison County Urban *** 12.7 (10.8, 14.9) 20 (10, 36) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Simpson County Urban *** 13.1 (8.3, 20.1) 19 (3, 42) 5
*
*
Lincoln County Rural *** 13.2 (8.9, 19.2) 18 (3, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.2)
Pontotoc County Rural *** 13.6 (8.7, 20.3) 17 (2, 42) 5
*
*
Panola County Rural *** 14.1 (9.3, 20.6) 16 (2, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.3)
Bolivar County Rural *** 14.2 (9.2, 21.2) 15 (2, 41) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Oktibbeha County Rural *** 14.6 (10.0, 20.5) 14 (2, 41) 7
*
*
Monroe County Rural *** 14.8 (10.4, 20.7) 13 (2, 41) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.7)
Neshoba County Rural *** 15.3 (10.1, 22.5) 12 (1, 41) 6
*
*
Pearl River County Rural *** 16.7 (13.0, 21.3) 11 (2, 30) 14 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.3)
Newton County Rural *** 16.8 (10.4, 25.8) 10 (1, 41) 4 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.9)
Walthall County Rural *** 17.0 (9.7, 28.3) 9 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Grenada County Rural *** 17.1 (10.9, 25.9) 8 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 17.5 (14.2, 21.3) 7 (2, 22) 21 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -2.1)
Prentiss County Rural *** 17.5 (11.9, 25.2) 6 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Yazoo County Urban *** 17.9 (11.5, 26.7) 5 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Calhoun County Rural *** 19.5 (11.7, 31.4) 4 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Washington County Rural *** 20.0 (15.0, 26.3) 3 (1, 23) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Holmes County Urban *** 23.5 (14.7, 35.7) 2 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Coahoma County Rural *** 26.8 (18.1, 38.3) 1 (1, 16) 7 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.4)
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 12:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top