Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 23.4 (22.5, 24.5) N/A 458 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Tunica County Urban No 68.0 (38.1, 111.2) 1 (1, 30) 3
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural No 44.0 (24.9, 73.0) 2 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Yazoo County Urban No 41.5 (27.6, 60.4) 3 (1, 38) 6
*
*
Washington County Rural No 39.6 (30.1, 51.4) 4 (1, 23) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Coahoma County Rural No 37.1 (23.9, 55.3) 5 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -4.8 (-23.6, 0.7)
Holmes County Urban No 37.0 (22.1, 58.5) 6 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Sunflower County Rural No 33.4 (21.0, 50.7) 7 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Grenada County Rural No 32.8 (20.8, 49.6) 8 (1, 47) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.3)
Walthall County Rural No 31.9 (17.6, 54.2) 9 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural No 31.4 (21.5, 45.1) 10 (2, 45) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Leflore County Rural No 30.7 (20.1, 45.2) 11 (2, 47) 6
*
*
Bolivar County Rural No 30.4 (20.5, 43.7) 12 (2, 46) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.9)
Warren County Rural No 30.2 (21.4, 41.4) 13 (2, 44) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Marion County Rural No 30.2 (19.4, 45.3) 14 (2, 47) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.3)
Jasper County Rural No 29.3 (16.1, 49.6) 15 (1, 48) 3
*
*
Monroe County Rural No 28.8 (19.6, 41.2) 16 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
George County Rural No 28.1 (17.0, 44.1) 17 (2, 48) 4
*
*
Lowndes County Rural No 27.5 (20.7, 36.2) 18 (4, 44) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 20.2)
Madison County Urban No 27.5 (22.1, 33.9) 19 (6, 41) 19 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.9, 2.8)
Marshall County Urban No 27.1 (17.9, 39.7) 20 (3, 48) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.9)
Panola County Rural No 26.7 (17.5, 39.1) 21 (3, 48) 6
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural No 26.0 (15.0, 43.0) 22 (2, 48) 4
*
*
Attala County Rural No 25.3 (14.4, 42.1) 23 (2, 48) 3
*
*
DeSoto County Urban No 25.0 (20.9, 29.7) 24 (10, 42) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Clay County Rural No 24.8 (14.5, 40.5) 25 (3, 48) 4
*
*
Lincoln County Rural No 24.8 (16.6, 36.0) 26 (4, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Union County Rural No 24.0 (14.7, 37.4) 27 (4, 48) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 23.2 (15.2, 34.0) 28 (5, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.9)
Prentiss County Rural No 23.0 (12.7, 38.3) 29 (3, 48) 3
*
*
Copiah County Urban No 23.0 (14.0, 36.0) 30 (4, 48) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Lee County Rural No 22.7 (17.2, 29.6) 31 (11, 47) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.0)
Hinds County Urban No 22.6 (19.2, 26.4) 32 (16, 45) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Pike County Rural No 22.4 (15.0, 32.4) 33 (7, 48) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Hancock County Urban No 22.4 (15.7, 31.4) 34 (8, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Pontotoc County Rural No 21.7 (13.5, 33.4) 35 (6, 48) 4
*
*
Lafayette County Rural No 21.7 (14.7, 30.8) 36 (8, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.5)
Pearl River County Rural No 21.7 (15.3, 30.0) 37 (9, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.2)
Jackson County Urban No 21.6 (17.5, 26.4) 38 (16, 47) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Harrison County Urban No 21.1 (17.7, 25.1) 39 (19, 47) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Lauderdale County Rural No 21.0 (15.6, 27.9) 40 (12, 48) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Scott County Urban No 20.8 (12.6, 32.9) 41 (7, 48) 4
*
*
Forrest County Urban No 20.7 (15.0, 27.7) 42 (13, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Tate County Urban No 20.6 (12.0, 33.3) 43 (6, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 1.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 20.5 (11.9, 33.1) 44 (7, 48) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Alcorn County Rural No 20.5 (12.8, 31.3) 45 (7, 48) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.9)
Jones County Rural No 20.2 (14.6, 27.3) 46 (13, 48) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Rankin County Urban No 16.6 (13.3, 20.6) 47 (31, 48) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Lamar County Urban Yes 14.2 (9.3, 20.9) 48 (29, 48) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.3)
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/03/2025 10:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top