Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 24.5 (23.4, 25.7) N/A 354 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 3.1)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Adams County Rural No 37.4 (25.2, 53.7) 11 (2, 32) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Bolivar County Rural No 62.3 (42.0, 88.1) 2 (1, 14) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.1)
Carroll County Rural No 38.2 (21.5, 65.9) 9 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Clarke County Rural No 43.5 (26.5, 68.0) 5 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Coahoma County Rural No 44.9 (27.9, 68.6) 4 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
DeSoto County Urban No 24.2 (19.1, 30.2) 26 (13, 35) 17 stable stable trend 15.1 (-2.7, 30.7)
Forrest County Urban No 17.4 (11.4, 25.3) 35 (19, 38) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -2.1)
Grenada County Rural No 29.3 (16.6, 48.0) 18 (3, 38) 3
*
*
Hancock County Urban Yes 16.1 (9.9, 24.9) 36 (19, 38) 4
*
*
Harrison County Urban No 22.9 (18.7, 27.7) 29 (16, 36) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Hinds County Urban No 29.8 (25.0, 35.3) 17 (8, 29) 29 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.3, -2.1)
Holmes County Urban No 42.2 (24.6, 67.8) 6 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Jackson County Urban No 23.6 (18.6, 29.4) 28 (14, 36) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 7.8)
Jasper County Rural No 30.0 (17.3, 49.5) 16 (3, 38) 3
*
*
Jones County Rural No 21.7 (15.2, 30.0) 30 (13, 38) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -1.0)
Lafayette County Rural No 38.8 (25.7, 55.6) 8 (2, 33) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Lamar County Urban Yes 13.3 (7.9, 20.9) 38 (25, 38) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.1, -2.6)
Lauderdale County Rural No 20.5 (14.4, 28.3) 33 (15, 38) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -3.1)
Lee County Rural No 25.8 (18.2, 35.3) 25 (8, 37) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.7)
Leflore County Rural No 68.9 (47.7, 95.8) 1 (1, 11) 7
*
*
Lincoln County Rural No 28.8 (18.5, 42.9) 19 (4, 37) 5
*
*
Lowndes County Rural No 27.0 (18.7, 37.5) 22 (7, 37) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.3)
Madison County Urban No 32.0 (24.1, 41.4) 13 (5, 32) 13 falling falling trend -6.7 (-10.8, -4.5)
Marshall County Urban No 34.0 (22.1, 49.9) 12 (3, 35) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Monroe County Rural No 21.6 (13.2, 33.6) 32 (10, 38) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Neshoba County Rural No 31.8 (19.5, 48.9) 15 (3, 37) 4
*
*
Oktibbeha County Rural No 20.4 (12.5, 31.4) 34 (11, 38) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -2.2)
Panola County Rural No 23.7 (14.1, 37.2) 27 (7, 38) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Pearl River County Rural No 21.6 (15.0, 30.4) 31 (12, 38) 7
*
*
Pike County Rural No 28.2 (18.8, 40.9) 21 (5, 37) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Pontotoc County Rural No 26.0 (15.3, 41.1) 24 (5, 38) 4
*
*
Rankin County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.6, 20.0) 37 (28, 38) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.1)
Scott County Urban No 37.8 (23.8, 56.9) 10 (2, 36) 5
*
*
Sunflower County Rural No 57.5 (37.9, 82.9) 3 (1, 19) 6
*
*
Tate County Urban No 26.8 (15.7, 42.6) 23 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Warren County Rural No 28.3 (18.6, 41.2) 20 (5, 37) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.4)
Washington County Rural No 31.9 (21.6, 45.2) 14 (4, 35) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Yazoo County Urban No 42.0 (25.6, 64.0) 7 (1, 34) 4 rising rising trend 37.5 (0.1, 68.1)
Alcorn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Copiah County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prentiss County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top