Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri N/A No 194.4 (192.3, 196.5) N/A 6,907 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Scotland County Rural No 141.7 (88.0, 218.8) 115 (17, 115) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-30.4, -1.6)
Holt County Rural No 144.5 (92.2, 222.1) 114 (14, 115) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Platte County Urban No 158.4 (143.3, 174.6) 113 (87, 115) 88 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Nodaway County Rural No 160.6 (130.2, 196.6) 112 (47, 115) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Phelps County Rural No 163.1 (141.7, 187.0) 111 (67, 115) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Warren County Urban No 164.0 (140.2, 190.8) 110 (58, 115) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.5)
St. Charles County Urban No 165.5 (157.8, 173.6) 109 (92, 114) 363 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Cole County Urban No 165.6 (148.5, 184.2) 108 (71, 115) 73 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Cedar County Rural No 166.1 (133.1, 205.9) 107 (36, 115) 19 falling falling trend -3.8 (-12.0, -1.9)
Howard County Urban No 172.6 (129.3, 226.8) 106 (13, 115) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Clark County Rural No 175.2 (125.4, 240.3) 105 (9, 115) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.2)
Ste. Genevieve County Rural No 175.3 (144.2, 211.8) 104 (33, 115) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 4.0)
Stone County Rural No 177.5 (154.7, 203.5) 103 (43, 115) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.7)
St. Louis County Urban No 178.2 (173.2, 183.2) 102 (80, 106) 1,029 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
Clay County Urban No 178.9 (168.2, 190.2) 101 (69, 110) 223 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Pike County Rural No 179.0 (145.0, 218.9) 100 (24, 115) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Barton County Rural No 180.7 (141.1, 229.3) 99 (12, 115) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Daviess County Rural No 181.6 (133.7, 242.5) 98 (8, 115) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Greene County Urban No 182.1 (172.8, 191.9) 97 (66, 107) 293 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Christian County Urban No 182.4 (165.3, 200.8) 96 (51, 112) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Polk County Urban No 183.0 (156.5, 212.9) 95 (33, 115) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Camden County Rural No 185.1 (166.0, 206.5) 94 (41, 112) 79 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Boone County Urban No 185.7 (172.0, 200.1) 93 (54, 108) 146 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jackson County Urban No 186.0 (179.6, 192.6) 92 (69, 100) 682 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.0, -1.5)
Carroll County Rural No 186.3 (140.4, 244.3) 91 (10, 115) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Cape Girardeau County Urban No 186.4 (168.7, 205.6) 90 (44, 111) 84 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Cass County Urban No 186.7 (171.6, 202.8) 89 (49, 109) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Grundy County Rural No 188.3 (145.4, 241.6) 88 (9, 115) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Taney County Rural No 188.7 (169.6, 209.6) 87 (41, 111) 76 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Gasconade County Rural No 188.7 (154.0, 230.1) 86 (18, 115) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Douglas County Rural No 190.3 (153.7, 234.9) 85 (14, 115) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Osage County Urban No 190.5 (149.3, 240.0) 84 (13, 115) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.4)
Andrew County Urban No 190.6 (156.1, 231.2) 83 (18, 115) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Lewis County Rural No 190.8 (143.8, 249.2) 82 (6, 115) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Bates County Urban No 192.4 (154.8, 236.9) 81 (14, 115) 19 falling falling trend -18.0 (-29.9, -1.5)
Bollinger County Urban No 192.9 (151.0, 244.4) 80 (11, 115) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Wright County Rural No 193.1 (159.0, 233.0) 79 (16, 115) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Lafayette County Urban No 194.4 (168.4, 223.6) 78 (23, 112) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Clinton County Urban No 195.0 (163.6, 231.2) 77 (20, 114) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Callaway County Urban No 195.3 (171.7, 221.4) 76 (27, 111) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 198.8 (187.3, 210.9) 75 (44, 95) 251 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 200.6 (178.1, 225.1) 74 (25, 107) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Franklin County Urban No 200.7 (184.9, 217.5) 73 (35, 101) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
St. Louis City Urban No 201.0 (190.2, 212.2) 72 (43, 93) 297 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -2.4)
Pulaski County Rural No 201.1 (171.8, 233.6) 71 (16, 112) 37 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Ralls County Rural No 201.3 (157.2, 255.6) 70 (7, 115) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Cooper County Urban No 201.5 (163.9, 245.6) 69 (9, 114) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Texas County Rural No 201.8 (173.2, 234.3) 68 (17, 112) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Perry County Rural No 201.9 (167.9, 241.3) 67 (12, 113) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Buchanan County Urban No 202.4 (184.2, 221.9) 66 (29, 101) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Madison County Rural No 203.2 (162.5, 251.9) 65 (7, 115) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Worth County Rural No 203.7 (111.3, 355.6) 64 (1, 115) 3
*
*
Caldwell County Urban No 204.0 (152.5, 268.1) 63 (3, 115) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Benton County Rural No 206.0 (177.5, 239.3) 62 (14, 110) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Monroe County Rural No 206.6 (159.0, 266.0) 61 (4, 115) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Henry County Rural No 206.9 (176.7, 241.4) 60 (12, 110) 35 falling falling trend -3.9 (-13.6, -0.7)
Maries County Rural No 209.8 (161.3, 270.3) 59 (3, 115) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Miller County Rural No 210.0 (179.5, 244.7) 58 (11, 110) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Vernon County Rural No 210.3 (175.3, 250.8) 57 (8, 112) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Dent County Rural No 211.9 (173.5, 257.2) 56 (6, 112) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Saline County Rural No 212.0 (178.3, 250.5) 55 (8, 111) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Laclede County Rural No 212.5 (185.2, 242.8) 54 (14, 105) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Jasper County Urban No 212.6 (196.6, 229.5) 53 (26, 85) 138 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Newton County Urban No 213.4 (192.2, 236.4) 52 (19, 96) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Dade County Rural No 215.3 (165.4, 278.2) 51 (2, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Livingston County Rural No 216.6 (174.9, 266.1) 50 (4, 112) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Adair County Rural No 216.8 (182.0, 256.7) 49 (8, 111) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 217.4 (191.7, 245.7) 48 (12, 101) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Johnson County Rural No 217.9 (192.3, 245.9) 47 (11, 99) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Moniteau County Urban No 219.7 (177.6, 269.1) 46 (3, 112) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
DeKalb County Urban No 219.8 (174.9, 273.4) 45 (2, 114) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Scott County Rural No 219.9 (192.9, 249.8) 44 (10, 98) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Ozark County Rural No 220.7 (174.9, 278.2) 43 (2, 113) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Pettis County Rural No 220.7 (195.0, 249.0) 42 (12, 96) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Harrison County Rural No 221.0 (170.3, 284.2) 41 (2, 114) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Schuyler County Rural No 221.8 (146.7, 324.3) 40 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Webster County Urban No 224.0 (195.6, 255.3) 39 (9, 100) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Barry County Rural No 224.6 (198.3, 253.7) 38 (8, 95) 57 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Reynolds County Rural No 226.1 (170.7, 297.4) 37 (1, 114) 12 stable stable trend 12.5 (-0.2, 26.8)
Macon County Rural No 226.1 (185.7, 273.3) 36 (3, 110) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Sullivan County Rural No 228.7 (165.3, 310.1) 35 (1, 114) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Pemiscot County Rural No 230.4 (186.8, 281.4) 34 (2, 110) 21 falling falling trend -10.6 (-24.9, -1.0)
Linn County Rural No 230.4 (184.6, 285.2) 33 (1, 111) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Morgan County Rural No 231.8 (199.9, 268.2) 32 (4, 92) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Marion County Rural No 231.8 (199.7, 267.8) 31 (5, 92) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Chariton County Rural No 232.2 (179.8, 297.8) 30 (1, 113) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Shelby County Rural No 234.0 (172.2, 313.4) 29 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Stoddard County Rural No 235.1 (205.3, 268.5) 28 (5, 87) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
St. Clair County Rural No 235.5 (188.8, 292.6) 27 (1, 111) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Mississippi County Rural No 236.7 (188.1, 294.4) 26 (1, 110) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Crawford County Rural No 239.2 (204.6, 278.4) 25 (2, 86) 36 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Hickory County Rural No 239.6 (190.0, 302.0) 24 (1, 108) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Dallas County Urban No 243.4 (203.6, 289.4) 23 (2, 103) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
McDonald County Rural No 244.2 (206.6, 286.8) 22 (2, 90) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Iron County Rural No 246.3 (195.8, 307.5) 21 (1, 109) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
St. Francois County Rural No 247.7 (225.7, 271.4) 20 (4, 56) 99 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Gentry County Rural No 248.5 (183.7, 330.7) 19 (1, 113) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.7)
Howell County Rural No 250.5 (223.1, 280.4) 18 (3, 61) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Ray County Urban No 252.2 (216.1, 293.0) 17 (1, 74) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Washington County Rural No 252.8 (217.8, 292.1) 16 (1, 74) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.3)
Butler County Rural No 252.8 (226.1, 281.9) 15 (2, 58) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Shannon County Rural No 253.8 (193.4, 329.4) 14 (1, 110) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6)
Mercer County Rural No 259.4 (176.5, 372.8) 13 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Atchison County Rural No 261.4 (196.0, 345.9) 12 (1, 110) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Putnam County Rural No 262.3 (192.8, 352.8) 11 (1, 112) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.3, -0.1)
Wayne County Rural No 262.7 (215.8, 318.6) 10 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Audrain County Rural No 263.7 (221.8, 311.0) 9 (1, 69) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Oregon County Rural No 264.6 (210.8, 330.1) 8 (1, 103) 18 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 18.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 270.9 (220.4, 330.5) 7 (1, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Randolph County Rural No 272.6 (234.4, 315.4) 6 (1, 54) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Knox County Rural No 275.4 (190.0, 389.9) 5 (1, 114) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.7)
New Madrid County Rural No 283.9 (239.3, 335.1) 4 (1, 59) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Dunklin County Rural No 291.0 (254.3, 331.7) 3 (1, 36) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Ripley County Rural No 293.9 (240.2, 357.1) 2 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.7)
Carter County Rural No 302.1 (222.4, 403.3) 1 (1, 102) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 6:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top