Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri N/A No 139.3 (137.7, 141.0) N/A 6,102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Carroll County Rural Yes 106.6 (76.9, 147.4) 115 (28, 115) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Platte County Urban Yes 107.7 (96.8, 119.5) 114 (89, 115) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Osage County Urban Yes 116.4 (86.3, 154.6) 113 (22, 115) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Harrison County Rural Yes 117.2 (81.0, 166.3) 112 (7, 115) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Daviess County Rural Yes 118.1 (82.1, 166.5) 111 (8, 115) 8 falling falling trend -6.7 (-32.5, -0.4)
Howard County Urban Yes 119.1 (85.9, 162.8) 110 (12, 115) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-16.5, -1.3)
St. Charles County Urban Yes 120.4 (114.6, 126.5) 109 (84, 112) 330 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Cole County Urban Yes 120.8 (107.7, 135.3) 108 (62, 114) 66 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.2, -1.3)
Greene County Urban Yes 122.4 (115.6, 129.6) 107 (80, 112) 258 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Cape Girardeau County Urban No 123.8 (110.8, 138.1) 106 (58, 114) 72 falling falling trend -4.7 (-11.1, -0.8)
Boone County Urban No 124.2 (114.3, 134.7) 105 (64, 112) 123 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Knox County Rural No 125.0 (68.8, 212.5) 104 (1, 115) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.0)
Shelby County Rural No 126.0 (86.4, 181.9) 103 (4, 115) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Stone County Rural No 127.2 (108.2, 149.4) 102 (33, 115) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Monroe County Rural No 128.7 (93.3, 176.2) 101 (8, 115) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.4)
Caldwell County Urban No 129.5 (92.5, 178.6) 100 (6, 115) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Moniteau County Urban No 129.6 (100.1, 166.1) 99 (12, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Mercer County Rural No 129.7 (77.9, 211.7) 98 (2, 115) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.5)
Johnson County Rural No 130.2 (111.7, 151.0) 97 (31, 114) 37 falling falling trend -3.3 (-13.1, -0.5)
Taney County Rural No 130.6 (115.5, 147.4) 96 (39, 112) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Worth County Rural No 131.0 (69.3, 248.9) 95 (1, 115) 3
*
*
Clark County Rural No 131.5 (90.7, 188.0) 94 (3, 115) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
St. Louis County Urban No 131.6 (127.9, 135.3) 93 (70, 100) 1,037 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Barton County Rural No 132.3 (98.6, 175.0) 92 (6, 115) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Camden County Rural No 133.6 (117.2, 152.2) 91 (32, 112) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Putnam County Rural No 134.0 (87.0, 203.5) 90 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Holt County Rural No 134.1 (89.1, 202.9) 89 (3, 115) 6
*
*
Adair County Rural No 134.4 (109.3, 164.2) 88 (13, 115) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Clay County Urban No 134.8 (126.7, 143.2) 87 (51, 102) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Dallas County Urban No 135.5 (108.3, 168.4) 86 (10, 115) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Audrain County Rural No 136.0 (113.0, 162.8) 85 (18, 114) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Chariton County Rural No 136.2 (92.4, 195.5) 84 (3, 115) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Christian County Urban No 136.3 (123.0, 150.8) 83 (35, 108) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Cass County Urban No 136.7 (125.1, 149.3) 82 (39, 106) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Reynolds County Rural No 137.2 (93.5, 198.7) 81 (3, 115) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.1)
Jackson County Urban No 137.5 (132.7, 142.4) 80 (57, 93) 655 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.7, -1.2)
Miller County Rural No 137.7 (114.3, 165.0) 79 (13, 114) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Scott County Rural No 137.9 (118.8, 159.6) 78 (20, 112) 39 falling falling trend -4.0 (-10.6, -1.3)
Ste. Genevieve County Rural No 138.3 (111.1, 171.1) 77 (9, 114) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Franklin County Urban No 138.4 (126.4, 151.3) 76 (36, 106) 106 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lewis County Rural No 139.7 (103.9, 185.8) 75 (4, 115) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-16.7, 0.2)
Schuyler County Rural No 139.7 (83.7, 223.1) 74 (1, 115) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Sullivan County Rural No 140.1 (95.8, 201.8) 73 (2, 115) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Vernon County Rural No 141.2 (115.4, 171.7) 72 (9, 114) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Dade County Rural No 141.3 (101.7, 194.8) 71 (2, 115) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
St. Louis City Urban No 141.8 (134.1, 149.9) 70 (39, 93) 266 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.0, -2.1)
St. Clair County Rural No 141.8 (104.9, 190.2) 69 (3, 115) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Polk County Urban No 142.0 (120.1, 167.1) 68 (13, 113) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Livingston County Rural No 142.3 (112.8, 178.2) 67 (6, 114) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.7)
Henry County Rural No 142.4 (119.0, 170.1) 66 (10, 112) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Gasconade County Rural No 142.5 (112.9, 178.9) 65 (7, 114) 19 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Barry County Rural No 142.7 (122.6, 165.6) 64 (15, 110) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Phelps County Rural No 143.0 (123.8, 164.6) 63 (15, 109) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Nodaway County Rural No 143.1 (115.2, 176.5) 62 (8, 114) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Grundy County Rural No 143.1 (107.3, 189.0) 61 (3, 115) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Texas County Rural No 143.2 (119.6, 170.9) 60 (9, 113) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Carter County Rural No 143.4 (96.5, 209.1) 59 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Howell County Rural No 144.8 (126.0, 165.9) 58 (16, 108) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Morgan County Rural No 146.3 (120.3, 177.1) 57 (8, 112) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Warren County Urban No 146.4 (125.5, 170.1) 56 (12, 108) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 146.9 (123.7, 173.7) 55 (8, 111) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 147.7 (113.8, 190.7) 54 (3, 114) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Bollinger County Urban No 147.7 (111.1, 194.3) 53 (2, 115) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Andrew County Urban No 147.8 (120.3, 180.6) 52 (7, 113) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Atchison County Rural No 148.4 (99.2, 218.2) 51 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Jasper County Urban No 149.0 (137.0, 161.8) 50 (22, 90) 120 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Bates County Urban No 150.1 (119.9, 186.4) 49 (5, 113) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Pike County Rural No 150.1 (120.7, 185.6) 48 (5, 113) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
DeKalb County Urban No 150.3 (110.5, 201.4) 47 (2, 115) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Webster County Urban No 150.8 (129.4, 174.9) 46 (10, 107) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ralls County Rural No 151.3 (114.9, 197.7) 45 (2, 115) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Lafayette County Urban No 152.1 (130.7, 176.5) 44 (9, 104) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Cedar County Rural No 152.8 (121.0, 191.6) 43 (3, 113) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Jefferson County Urban No 153.4 (144.4, 162.9) 42 (23, 76) 226 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Callaway County Urban No 154.1 (134.2, 176.3) 41 (9, 101) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Linn County Rural No 155.8 (120.8, 199.1) 40 (2, 114) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Perry County Rural No 156.2 (127.5, 190.3) 39 (4, 110) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Lawrence County Rural No 156.6 (135.4, 180.4) 38 (6, 99) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Buchanan County Urban No 157.2 (142.8, 172.9) 37 (11, 84) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Pulaski County Rural No 157.3 (134.0, 183.4) 36 (4, 103) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Ray County Urban No 158.2 (132.5, 188.0) 35 (4, 108) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 158.4 (122.7, 202.9) 34 (2, 112) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Cooper County Urban No 158.9 (126.3, 197.9) 33 (3, 112) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.8)
Mississippi County Rural No 159.3 (123.2, 204.1) 32 (1, 114) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Douglas County Rural No 159.8 (126.3, 201.7) 31 (2, 112) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Lincoln County Urban No 159.9 (141.1, 180.5) 30 (7, 91) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Newton County Urban No 160.7 (143.6, 179.5) 29 (8, 87) 68 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Pettis County Rural No 162.9 (142.7, 185.4) 28 (6, 91) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Saline County Rural No 164.1 (136.3, 196.4) 27 (3, 105) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Dunklin County Rural No 164.1 (139.7, 192.0) 26 (3, 97) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Clinton County Urban No 165.3 (136.4, 199.2) 25 (3, 106) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Ozark County Rural No 165.4 (126.5, 216.4) 24 (1, 114) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Maries County Rural No 165.8 (124.6, 219.0) 23 (1, 113) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
McDonald County Rural No 165.9 (137.0, 199.5) 22 (2, 105) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Dent County Rural No 167.1 (133.3, 208.0) 21 (1, 109) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Wright County Rural No 168.6 (138.0, 204.7) 20 (2, 105) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.4)
Butler County Rural No 168.7 (149.2, 190.4) 19 (5, 79) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 169.6 (141.1, 202.7) 18 (2, 101) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.3)
Laclede County Rural No 169.8 (147.7, 194.5) 17 (4, 86) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.7)
Randolph County Rural No 171.6 (144.3, 203.0) 16 (2, 96) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Crawford County Rural No 172.0 (144.7, 203.5) 15 (2, 93) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Stoddard County Rural No 172.6 (148.1, 200.4) 14 (3, 85) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
St. Francois County Rural No 177.4 (160.0, 196.3) 13 (3, 55) 80 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Iron County Rural No 177.5 (137.9, 227.5) 12 (1, 108) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Benton County Rural No 181.5 (153.7, 214.5) 11 (1, 81) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Macon County Rural No 182.0 (147.7, 222.9) 10 (1, 98) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Hickory County Rural No 184.1 (138.7, 243.0) 9 (1, 108) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
New Madrid County Rural No 195.5 (162.8, 233.8) 8 (1, 60) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Oregon County Rural No 195.5 (150.7, 251.8) 7 (1, 100) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Scotland County Rural No 198.3 (133.1, 286.8) 6 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.7)
Pemiscot County Rural No 204.2 (167.6, 247.2) 5 (1, 74) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Shannon County Rural No 208.1 (155.2, 276.0) 4 (1, 105) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.2)
Gentry County Rural No 210.6 (152.5, 285.5) 3 (1, 104) 10 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Madison County Rural No 216.0 (175.6, 264.3) 2 (1, 50) 21 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.2, 15.5)
Ripley County Rural No 218.5 (173.2, 273.2) 1 (1, 59) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/12/2024 8:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top