Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri *** 169.2 (167.8, 170.7) N/A 11,391 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States 6 *** 160.2 (160.0, 160.4) N/A 465,913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Dunklin County *** 245.1 (222.7, 269.5) 1 (1, 18) 92 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Worth County *** 233.7 (163.3, 330.5) 2 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Madison County *** 228.1 (196.3, 264.1) 3 (1, 56) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
St. Francois County *** 227.0 (212.2, 242.7) 4 (1, 24) 179 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 1.9)
Pemiscot County *** 225.8 (194.8, 260.9) 5 (1, 66) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
New Madrid County *** 219.8 (192.1, 250.7) 6 (1, 63) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
McDonald County *** 217.4 (191.7, 245.9) 7 (1, 63) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Benton County *** 213.6 (191.9, 237.8) 8 (1, 57) 82 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Carter County *** 212.8 (169.6, 264.8) 9 (1, 112) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Butler County *** 212.2 (195.2, 230.5) 10 (1, 50) 119 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Ripley County *** 211.6 (183.4, 243.4) 11 (1, 78) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Stoddard County *** 210.7 (190.9, 232.3) 12 (1, 61) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Mercer County *** 210.7 (158.6, 277.3) 13 (1, 115) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Howell County *** 209.8 (192.6, 228.2) 14 (2, 55) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Randolph County *** 208.3 (185.1, 233.8) 15 (1, 73) 60 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Morgan County *** 205.8 (183.3, 230.9) 16 (1, 74) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Crawford County *** 205.0 (183.3, 228.9) 17 (1, 74) 68 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Wayne County *** 203.8 (176.5, 234.8) 18 (1, 91) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Linn County *** 201.9 (173.0, 234.9) 19 (1, 97) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Hickory County *** 201.3 (170.1, 238.2) 20 (1, 102) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Clinton County *** 201.0 (177.2, 227.4) 21 (1, 86) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Pike County *** 200.3 (174.4, 229.4) 22 (2, 95) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Adair County *** 200.0 (175.9, 226.7) 23 (1, 90) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Henry County *** 199.0 (177.3, 222.9) 24 (3, 85) 65 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Iron County *** 198.4 (167.5, 234.3) 25 (1, 104) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Scott County *** 196.6 (178.8, 216.0) 26 (5, 77) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Mississippi County *** 196.5 (165.7, 232.2) 27 (1, 108) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Laclede County *** 196.2 (178.0, 215.8) 28 (4, 81) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Putnam County *** 196.0 (154.3, 248.0) 29 (1, 114) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Chariton County *** 196.0 (160.9, 237.8) 30 (1, 111) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Washington County *** 195.8 (173.5, 220.5) 31 (3, 90) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Ray County *** 195.0 (172.8, 219.6) 32 (4, 92) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Jasper County *** 193.0 (182.3, 204.1) 33 (12, 65) 253 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Montgomery County *** 192.7 (163.5, 226.3) 34 (2, 110) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Newton County *** 192.4 (178.1, 207.5) 35 (10, 74) 140 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Pulaski County *** 192.2 (170.8, 215.4) 36 (4, 93) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Caldwell County *** 191.9 (157.8, 231.9) 37 (1, 113) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
DeKalb County *** 191.1 (160.0, 227.0) 38 (2, 111) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Pettis County *** 191.0 (173.9, 209.5) 39 (6, 86) 96 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Bates County *** 190.7 (165.7, 218.8) 40 (3, 102) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Buchanan County *** 188.2 (176.1, 200.9) 41 (15, 77) 189 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Lincoln County *** 187.9 (171.7, 205.1) 42 (8, 87) 105 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Barton County *** 185.3 (156.6, 218.5) 43 (3, 113) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Macon County *** 185.0 (159.6, 213.8) 44 (4, 109) 42 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.0, 11.6)
Dallas County *** 184.9 (160.5, 212.4) 45 (4, 110) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Audrain County *** 184.4 (163.5, 207.5) 46 (7, 105) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Bollinger County *** 184.4 (155.9, 217.2) 47 (2, 113) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Holt County *** 184.3 (139.5, 241.1) 48 (1, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Jefferson County *** 183.7 (175.9, 191.7) 49 (26, 72) 447 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Marion County *** 182.2 (162.5, 203.8) 50 (9, 106) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Wright County *** 182.1 (158.9, 208.1) 51 (7, 109) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Scotland County *** 181.7 (138.9, 235.0) 52 (1, 115) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Cedar County *** 181.5 (156.3, 210.2) 53 (5, 110) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Dade County *** 179.8 (146.7, 219.6) 54 (2, 115) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Knox County *** 179.7 (131.6, 241.8) 55 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Livingston County *** 178.8 (153.5, 207.6) 56 (7, 113) 38 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Ralls County *** 178.7 (149.0, 213.5) 57 (3, 114) 27 stable stable trend -13.9 (-28.0, 2.9)
Daviess County *** 178.5 (145.8, 217.4) 58 (2, 115) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Ozark County *** 178.2 (149.2, 212.8) 59 (4, 114) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Harrison County *** 178.1 (146.2, 216.1) 60 (2, 115) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Webster County *** 178.0 (160.3, 197.3) 61 (16, 105) 76 stable stable trend 6.7 (-2.5, 16.8)
Callaway County *** 177.1 (160.9, 194.6) 62 (19, 104) 91 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Barry County *** 175.5 (158.9, 193.6) 63 (17, 106) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Perry County *** 175.2 (152.6, 200.6) 64 (10, 112) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Dent County *** 174.8 (150.6, 202.4) 65 (9, 114) 40 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Vernon County *** 174.2 (152.8, 198.1) 66 (13, 112) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Lafayette County *** 174.0 (157.0, 192.6) 67 (22, 110) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Saline County *** 172.7 (151.1, 196.8) 68 (10, 113) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Nodaway County *** 172.4 (149.4, 198.4) 69 (11, 113) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Miller County *** 172.2 (152.4, 194.1) 70 (16, 112) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Phelps County *** 171.3 (155.1, 188.8) 71 (25, 110) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Monroe County *** 169.9 (139.8, 205.9) 72 (5, 115) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Franklin County *** 169.7 (159.5, 180.3) 73 (41, 101) 217 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Texas County *** 168.7 (150.2, 189.2) 74 (23, 112) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lawrence County *** 168.6 (152.5, 186.0) 75 (26, 111) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Cass County *** 167.4 (157.2, 178.1) 76 (45, 104) 207 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Gentry County *** 167.0 (131.4, 210.4) 77 (4, 115) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Andrew County *** 167.0 (143.9, 193.2) 78 (16, 115) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Schuyler County *** 166.6 (124.4, 220.2) 79 (1, 115) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Cape Girardeau County *** 166.3 (154.6, 178.7) 80 (40, 107) 156 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Reynolds County *** 166.1 (132.3, 208.0) 81 (5, 115) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Oregon County *** 166.1 (138.2, 198.8) 82 (10, 115) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Warren County *** 165.9 (148.8, 184.6) 83 (29, 113) 71 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
St. Clair County *** 165.4 (139.5, 196.4) 84 (14, 115) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Clay County *** 165.0 (157.6, 172.7) 85 (56, 101) 386 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Cooper County *** 163.3 (139.7, 190.1) 86 (17, 115) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Jackson County *** 162.9 (158.2, 167.7) 87 (66, 99) 961 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
St. Louis City *** 161.7 (152.6, 171.3) 88 (58, 108) 254 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -2.9)
Johnson County *** 161.6 (145.8, 178.7) 89 (41, 114) 79 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.3)
Lewis County *** 160.1 (130.6, 194.9) 90 (12, 115) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Stone County *** 159.9 (144.7, 176.7) 91 (42, 114) 97 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Camden County *** 159.9 (147.0, 173.9) 92 (48, 113) 130 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Greene County *** 159.7 (153.6, 166.0) 93 (68, 106) 535 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Osage County *** 159.7 (133.8, 189.4) 94 (17, 115) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Douglas County *** 159.2 (135.6, 186.5) 95 (24, 115) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Gasconade County *** 158.3 (135.7, 184.1) 96 (21, 115) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Sullivan County *** 157.8 (120.4, 205.3) 97 (6, 115) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Ste. Genevieve County *** 157.7 (136.5, 181.8) 98 (28, 115) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Shannon County *** 157.1 (127.2, 193.3) 99 (14, 115) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Carroll County *** 156.2 (127.0, 191.2) 100 (14, 115) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Taney County *** 154.2 (141.6, 167.8) 101 (60, 114) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
St. Charles County *** 154.1 (148.7, 159.7) 102 (81, 111) 638 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Grundy County *** 154.1 (126.9, 186.4) 103 (17, 115) 24 stable stable trend -15.8 (-34.2, 7.8)
Christian County *** 153.4 (142.2, 165.3) 104 (64, 114) 144 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Clark County *** 152.4 (119.5, 193.0) 105 (13, 115) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Polk County *** 151.0 (134.3, 169.3) 106 (54, 115) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Shelby County *** 150.6 (117.0, 192.5) 107 (9, 115) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
St. Louis County *** 148.7 (145.3, 152.1) 108 (94, 113) 1,610 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Maries County *** 148.3 (119.9, 182.6) 109 (27, 115) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Cole County *** 147.9 (136.4, 160.1) 110 (73, 115) 129 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Howard County *** 147.1 (118.0, 181.7) 111 (23, 115) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Platte County *** 146.9 (136.2, 158.4) 112 (78, 115) 145 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Boone County *** 146.2 (137.2, 155.6) 113 (87, 115) 208 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Atchison County *** 140.3 (106.4, 183.9) 114 (18, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Moniteau County *** 136.6 (113.5, 163.3) 115 (62, 115) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2021 12:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2018) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top