Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri N/A No 163.0 (161.7, 164.4) N/A 11,425 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Worth County Rural No 170.4 (112.0, 256.5) 78 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Schuyler County Rural No 180.7 (132.6, 242.3) 54 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Knox County Rural No 190.6 (140.0, 255.9) 34 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.6)
Mercer County Rural No 197.1 (145.4, 264.1) 24 (1, 115) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3)
Scotland County Rural No 176.5 (131.9, 232.7) 60 (1, 115) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Holt County Rural No 141.0 (104.5, 189.6) 111 (12, 115) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.4)
Clark County Rural No 150.3 (117.9, 190.4) 105 (14, 115) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Putnam County Rural No 195.1 (152.8, 248.1) 26 (1, 115) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Sullivan County Rural No 190.6 (148.6, 243.3) 35 (1, 115) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Carter County Rural No 208.5 (164.5, 262.4) 16 (1, 112) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Shelby County Rural No 170.7 (135.4, 214.3) 76 (3, 115) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Daviess County Rural No 150.8 (119.9, 187.9) 103 (16, 115) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Atchison County Rural No 201.7 (160.6, 252.5) 22 (1, 113) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Reynolds County Rural No 188.1 (150.6, 234.1) 42 (1, 115) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.9, -0.4)
Caldwell County Urban No 161.7 (129.9, 199.7) 88 (7, 115) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Howard County Urban No 151.9 (122.5, 187.0) 102 (19, 115) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Carroll County Rural No 145.4 (117.5, 179.3) 110 (30, 115) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.0)
Gentry County Rural No 228.6 (184.5, 281.3) 4 (1, 93) 20 rising rising trend 8.8 (0.1, 19.8)
Harrison County Rural No 163.8 (132.7, 201.1) 84 (9, 115) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lewis County Rural No 162.5 (132.4, 198.2) 86 (12, 115) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Chariton County Rural No 172.1 (139.2, 212.0) 73 (4, 115) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Dade County Rural No 177.2 (145.0, 216.0) 58 (3, 115) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 169.8 (138.6, 207.1) 79 (5, 115) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Shannon County Rural No 225.0 (185.7, 271.6) 5 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Maries County Rural No 188.8 (156.3, 227.3) 38 (2, 112) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Grundy County Rural No 165.4 (136.9, 199.2) 82 (13, 115) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Osage County Urban No 150.5 (125.2, 179.9) 104 (29, 115) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Barton County Rural No 159.8 (132.7, 191.4) 92 (17, 115) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Bollinger County Urban No 169.8 (141.5, 202.9) 80 (8, 115) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Mississippi County Rural No 188.2 (157.2, 224.5) 41 (2, 111) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
DeKalb County Urban No 184.8 (154.4, 220.2) 47 (3, 114) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Ralls County Rural No 173.1 (144.5, 206.6) 71 (7, 115) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
St. Clair County Rural No 192.2 (161.2, 228.6) 32 (2, 109) 32 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Oregon County Rural No 232.1 (196.3, 273.8) 3 (1, 72) 32 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.5, 15.8)
Iron County Rural No 214.2 (181.4, 252.3) 10 (1, 86) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Moniteau County Urban No 173.3 (147.2, 203.0) 70 (9, 114) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Ozark County Rural No 196.1 (164.7, 233.4) 25 (1, 103) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Linn County Rural No 189.1 (160.6, 221.9) 37 (3, 107) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Pemiscot County Rural No 206.6 (176.0, 241.8) 18 (1, 95) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 209.5 (178.7, 244.9) 15 (1, 87) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Hickory County Rural No 212.9 (177.9, 254.6) 11 (1, 94) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Livingston County Rural No 176.6 (150.9, 205.8) 59 (8, 113) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Douglas County Rural No 178.1 (152.5, 207.8) 57 (7, 111) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Cooper County Urban No 174.7 (149.6, 203.1) 65 (10, 112) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Pike County Rural No 160.0 (137.5, 185.7) 90 (25, 115) 37 falling falling trend -6.0 (-12.8, -1.0)
Cedar County Rural No 163.2 (139.4, 190.6) 85 (19, 115) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Bates County Urban No 171.6 (147.0, 199.5) 74 (11, 114) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Madison County Rural No 212.4 (182.8, 246.1) 12 (1, 81) 38 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 206.8 (177.0, 241.2) 17 (1, 90) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Ripley County Rural No 262.5 (225.9, 303.9) 1 (1, 23) 40 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Gasconade County Rural No 164.7 (141.8, 190.9) 83 (21, 115) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Nodaway County Rural No 154.5 (133.3, 178.5) 98 (34, 115) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Dent County Rural No 190.9 (164.6, 220.7) 33 (3, 102) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Ste. Genevieve County Rural No 154.4 (133.5, 178.0) 99 (38, 115) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Andrew County Urban No 173.9 (151.1, 199.6) 68 (11, 113) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Macon County Rural No 197.4 (171.0, 227.3) 23 (2, 96) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Wright County Rural No 184.4 (160.8, 210.8) 48 (6, 106) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Dallas County Urban No 188.3 (164.3, 215.3) 40 (5, 103) 47 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Perry County Rural No 182.0 (159.1, 207.6) 51 (8, 107) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Vernon County Rural No 174.5 (152.5, 199.3) 66 (14, 111) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Adair County Rural No 170.8 (149.7, 194.3) 75 (17, 112) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
New Madrid County Rural No 236.9 (207.6, 269.6) 2 (1, 37) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.8)
Clinton County Urban No 184.2 (161.9, 208.9) 49 (7, 103) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Saline County Rural No 193.0 (169.5, 219.2) 30 (4, 100) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Audrain County Rural No 174.2 (153.8, 196.9) 67 (15, 109) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
McDonald County Rural No 215.7 (190.3, 244.0) 9 (1, 62) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Miller County Rural No 174.9 (155.3, 196.5) 64 (15, 108) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Henry County Rural No 172.8 (153.7, 194.2) 72 (17, 109) 62 falling falling trend -4.2 (-11.0, -1.0)
Pulaski County Rural No 186.1 (165.7, 208.2) 44 (9, 96) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Ray County Urban No 203.9 (181.8, 228.3) 19 (3, 75) 65 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 218.6 (195.1, 244.3) 7 (1, 52) 65 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Morgan County Rural No 190.4 (169.3, 214.0) 36 (5, 95) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Texas County Rural No 175.7 (156.4, 197.0) 61 (13, 108) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Washington County Rural No 217.0 (193.5, 242.7) 8 (1, 59) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Crawford County Rural No 203.9 (181.8, 228.2) 20 (3, 79) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 184.1 (164.4, 205.7) 50 (10, 98) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Polk County Urban No 161.8 (144.5, 180.8) 87 (34, 114) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Warren County Urban No 155.0 (138.8, 172.7) 97 (50, 115) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -0.9)
Dunklin County Rural No 221.3 (198.9, 245.9) 6 (1, 45) 76 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Lafayette County Urban No 170.7 (153.6, 189.3) 77 (23, 109) 77 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Benton County Rural No 194.2 (174.0, 216.9) 29 (6, 86) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Scott County Rural No 179.3 (162.3, 197.8) 55 (17, 98) 84 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Stoddard County Rural No 202.6 (183.2, 223.7) 21 (3, 71) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Webster County Urban No 188.0 (170.2, 207.3) 43 (9, 90) 84 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 7.5)
Phelps County Rural No 158.1 (143.0, 174.5) 95 (46, 114) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Johnson County Rural No 175.0 (158.6, 192.6) 63 (21, 104) 87 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Laclede County Rural No 192.5 (174.8, 211.6) 31 (8, 79) 91 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Barry County Rural No 185.7 (168.6, 204.3) 46 (11, 91) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Stone County Rural No 154.2 (138.8, 171.2) 100 (53, 115) 94 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Lawrence County Rural No 188.7 (171.7, 207.2) 39 (9, 89) 94 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Callaway County Urban No 173.8 (158.1, 190.7) 69 (23, 101) 95 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Pettis County Rural No 195.0 (177.9, 213.4) 27 (8, 75) 101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Howell County Rural No 194.5 (178.1, 212.2) 28 (7, 76) 108 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 180.9 (165.9, 196.9) 53 (18, 92) 114 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Butler County Rural No 210.3 (193.4, 228.5) 14 (3, 53) 118 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Cole County Urban No 136.6 (126.0, 148.1) 114 (93, 115) 127 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.6)
Taney County Rural No 160.0 (147.5, 173.5) 91 (50, 111) 132 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Camden County Rural No 161.4 (148.4, 175.5) 89 (45, 110) 134 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.1)
Newton County Urban No 185.8 (172.1, 200.5) 45 (15, 83) 142 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Cape Girardeau County Urban No 149.4 (138.5, 161.1) 106 (73, 115) 147 falling falling trend -2.9 (-7.1, -0.8)
Platte County Urban No 135.3 (125.7, 145.5) 115 (96, 115) 153 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Christian County Urban No 158.9 (148.0, 170.3) 94 (56, 111) 165 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 4.4)
St. Francois County Rural No 210.8 (196.8, 225.5) 13 (3, 43) 175 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Buchanan County Urban No 181.2 (169.2, 193.9) 52 (22, 87) 179 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Cass County Urban No 159.2 (149.6, 169.4) 93 (61, 108) 213 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.4)
Franklin County Urban No 166.3 (156.5, 176.5) 81 (46, 101) 230 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Boone County Urban No 149.2 (140.6, 158.1) 108 (80, 113) 237 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
St. Louis City Urban No 149.0 (140.4, 158.1) 109 (79, 114) 243 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.6)
Jasper County Urban No 178.3 (168.3, 188.8) 56 (28, 89) 246 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Clay County Urban No 155.6 (148.8, 162.7) 96 (73, 108) 399 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 175.5 (168.2, 183.1) 62 (38, 83) 467 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.8, -1.1)
Greene County Urban No 149.4 (143.6, 155.3) 107 (83, 112) 531 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -1.1)
St. Charles County Urban No 141.0 (136.1, 146.0) 112 (100, 115) 658 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.8, -1.4)
Jackson County Urban No 153.0 (148.6, 157.5) 101 (83, 108) 958 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.5)
St. Louis County Urban No 140.1 (136.9, 143.4) 113 (102, 115) 1,524 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.6, -1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2024 6:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top