Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Missouri No 139.0 (137.4, 140.6) N/A 6,049 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Mercer County No 154.4 (95.4, 243.2) 39 (1, 115) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.5)
Reynolds County No 134.3 (91.9, 193.9) 81 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Scotland County No 175.9 (116.1, 258.0) 9 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Knox County No 154.4 (93.0, 244.9) 38 (1, 115) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Livingston County No 159.0 (128.2, 195.9) 27 (1, 109) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Gentry County No 158.3 (109.2, 223.7) 30 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Putnam County No 145.0 (97.4, 214.3) 58 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Atchison County No 132.1 (82.6, 204.0) 85 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Cedar County No 159.4 (127.2, 198.6) 26 (1, 109) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Chariton County No 152.2 (109.3, 209.2) 42 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Clinton County No 165.4 (135.7, 200.2) 19 (1, 101) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Montgomery County No 183.8 (145.0, 231.3) 6 (1, 91) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
New Madrid County No 178.7 (147.7, 215.2) 8 (1, 86) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Saline County No 170.9 (142.8, 203.3) 13 (1, 94) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Wright County No 161.3 (132.2, 195.6) 22 (1, 108) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Caldwell County No 155.7 (113.9, 209.4) 34 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Ralls County No 145.8 (110.5, 191.0) 56 (2, 115) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Daviess County No 146.5 (106.7, 198.5) 53 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Barton County No 146.9 (112.3, 190.2) 51 (1, 114) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Lafayette County No 147.3 (126.3, 171.2) 50 (9, 107) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Linn County No 170.1 (133.8, 214.5) 15 (1, 107) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Newton County No 167.7 (150.1, 187.0) 16 (3, 67) 70 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Pemiscot County No 200.6 (165.2, 242.0) 1 (1, 68) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Butler County No 160.8 (141.8, 181.9) 23 (4, 87) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Carter County No 136.3 (92.2, 197.1) 76 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Crawford County No 167.4 (141.3, 197.7) 17 (1, 91) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Henry County No 150.3 (125.1, 180.0) 45 (4, 108) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Osage County No 123.1 (93.1, 160.8) 105 (10, 115) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Stoddard County No 165.6 (142.0, 192.5) 18 (2, 88) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Sullivan County No 128.7 (85.5, 189.2) 93 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Texas County No 144.7 (121.3, 172.0) 59 (7, 109) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Andrew County No 130.9 (105.0, 162.3) 87 (14, 115) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Cape Girardeau County No 139.1 (125.0, 154.5) 67 (24, 106) 77 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Randolph County No 183.7 (155.1, 216.5) 7 (1, 70) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Ray County No 137.1 (113.4, 165.1) 72 (10, 113) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Schuyler County Yes 109.6 (65.8, 176.4) 112 (3, 115) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
St. Francois County No 185.4 (167.5, 204.9) 4 (1, 39) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Washington County No 160.2 (133.3, 191.6) 24 (2, 104) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Adair County No 141.2 (115.0, 172.2) 65 (7, 113) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Bollinger County No 140.6 (106.3, 183.6) 66 (2, 115) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Grundy County No 127.5 (93.3, 171.8) 95 (6, 115) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Lawrence County No 161.9 (140.6, 185.8) 21 (3, 87) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Macon County No 173.6 (140.9, 212.8) 11 (1, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Madison County No 195.8 (157.8, 241.7) 2 (1, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
McDonald County No 185.1 (153.9, 221.0) 5 (1, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Perry County No 136.7 (109.5, 169.2) 74 (8, 114) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Pulaski County No 158.9 (135.4, 185.1) 29 (3, 95) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Audrain County No 154.9 (130.6, 183.0) 37 (3, 104) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Barry County No 133.4 (114.6, 154.9) 84 (22, 112) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Hickory County No 171.3 (132.5, 221.6) 12 (1, 110) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Lincoln County No 146.5 (128.2, 166.7) 52 (12, 102) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Mississippi County No 162.4 (128.0, 204.7) 20 (1, 109) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Nodaway County No 137.5 (109.8, 170.8) 70 (8, 114) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pettis County No 170.4 (149.3, 193.9) 14 (2, 75) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Pike County No 156.9 (127.0, 192.6) 32 (1, 110) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Ripley County No 157.3 (125.3, 196.3) 31 (1, 112) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Ste. Genevieve County No 123.2 (98.1, 153.9) 104 (18, 115) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Buchanan County No 152.2 (138.2, 167.3) 43 (13, 84) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Dade County Yes 116.8 (81.2, 166.7) 109 (9, 115) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Dunklin County No 159.7 (136.6, 186.1) 25 (3, 99) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Howell County No 136.1 (117.9, 156.6) 77 (17, 110) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Laclede County No 151.7 (130.7, 175.4) 44 (7, 101) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Morgan County No 152.6 (126.0, 184.1) 41 (3, 108) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Callaway County No 149.9 (130.2, 172.1) 46 (8, 100) 43 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Carroll County No 129.8 (96.2, 174.2) 89 (4, 115) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Cooper County No 143.4 (113.4, 179.6) 61 (3, 114) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Marion County No 146.4 (123.6, 172.6) 54 (7, 111) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Shannon County No 145.1 (104.7, 198.4) 57 (1, 115) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Vernon County No 134.4 (109.6, 163.9) 80 (10, 114) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Dent County No 145.9 (116.3, 182.0) 55 (4, 114) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Franklin County No 136.8 (124.8, 149.7) 73 (34, 104) 102 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Jasper County No 155.7 (143.3, 168.8) 35 (12, 75) 123 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Oregon County No 138.7 (106.2, 180.4) 68 (4, 115) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Phelps County No 158.9 (138.2, 181.9) 28 (4, 91) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Benton County No 188.6 (158.7, 223.9) 3 (1, 70) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Cass County No 135.5 (123.8, 148.2) 78 (35, 105) 103 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Christian County No 124.0 (111.1, 138.1) 101 (52, 113) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Maries County No 128.9 (93.3, 176.3) 92 (4, 115) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Bates County No 147.8 (118.5, 183.2) 48 (3, 113) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Clark County Yes 102.7 (67.1, 154.0) 115 (14, 115) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Gasconade County No 143.8 (113.9, 180.5) 60 (4, 113) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Wayne County No 138.2 (106.5, 178.0) 69 (4, 115) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Greene County No 127.7 (120.6, 135.1) 94 (62, 106) 260 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Jefferson County No 152.9 (143.8, 162.5) 40 (18, 70) 218 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Lewis County No 124.6 (91.0, 168.4) 100 (7, 115) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Shelby County No 141.4 (99.0, 200.2) 64 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
St. Clair County No 132.0 (99.1, 175.6) 86 (5, 115) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Webster County No 147.6 (126.3, 171.6) 49 (7, 107) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Clay County No 130.7 (122.6, 139.2) 88 (53, 104) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Polk County No 129.8 (109.1, 153.7) 90 (23, 114) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
St. Louis County No 133.5 (129.8, 137.2) 82 (60, 92) 1,062 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Stone County No 125.8 (107.3, 147.5) 98 (31, 114) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Warren County No 136.5 (116.4, 159.3) 75 (18, 111) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Camden County Yes 109.6 (95.3, 126.1) 111 (72, 115) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Dallas County No 141.9 (113.3, 176.5) 63 (3, 113) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Taney County No 125.6 (110.9, 142.0) 99 (43, 113) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Iron County No 133.4 (101.8, 174.4) 83 (6, 115) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Moniteau County Yes 108.0 (80.7, 142.3) 113 (37, 115) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Ozark County No 129.0 (93.5, 176.6) 91 (3, 115) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
St. Charles County No 123.3 (117.2, 129.6) 103 (73, 108) 321 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Boone County Yes 119.8 (110.0, 130.3) 108 (70, 112) 115 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
DeKalb County No 155.4 (113.5, 209.0) 36 (1, 115) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Douglas County No 123.7 (98.0, 156.3) 102 (17, 115) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Platte County Yes 113.5 (101.9, 126.1) 110 (74, 115) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Monroe County No 134.6 (98.6, 182.5) 79 (4, 115) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Cole County No 127.4 (113.8, 142.2) 96 (46, 112) 68 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Jackson County No 137.4 (132.6, 142.4) 71 (50, 87) 641 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
St. Louis City No 148.2 (140.3, 156.5) 47 (26, 75) 280 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Howard County Yes 102.7 (71.0, 145.4) 114 (23, 115) 7 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.6, -2.1)
Johnson County Yes 120.2 (102.7, 139.8) 107 (40, 115) 35 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.4, -0.6)
Scott County No 143.4 (124.2, 165.0) 62 (12, 107) 42 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.8, -0.8)
Harrison County No 126.4 (88.7, 176.8) 97 (3, 115) 9 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.8, -1.8)
Miller County Yes 121.6 (100.1, 146.9) 106 (33, 115) 23 stable stable trend -10.6 (-20.1, 0.0)
Holt County No 156.0 (101.3, 235.7) 33 (1, 115) 7
*
*
Worth County No 174.9 (103.5, 299.1) 10 (1, 115) 4
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 6:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top