Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Missouri by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri N/A No 14.1 (13.8, 14.5) N/A 1,106 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 3.4)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Cedar County Rural No 14.5 (7.7, 25.4) 51 (2, 77) 3 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.8, -0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 18.9 (10.5, 32.2) 22 (1, 77) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.3)
St. Clair County Rural No 22.3 (11.8, 39.4) 7 (1, 77) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Clinton County Urban No 12.8 (7.3, 20.9) 67 (9, 77) 3
*
*
Oregon County Rural No 25.8 (14.5, 43.5) 4 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Ralls County Rural No 21.6 (12.2, 36.6) 9 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Andrew County Urban No 14.6 (8.7, 23.5) 49 (5, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Hickory County Rural No 18.3 (11.0, 32.7) 27 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Linn County Rural No 19.6 (11.5, 32.2) 19 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.6)
Perry County Rural No 13.4 (7.9, 21.8) 59 (6, 77) 4
*
*
Ripley County Rural No 22.5 (13.5, 36.4) 5 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Wayne County Rural No 18.4 (11.0, 30.5) 26 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Dallas County Urban No 15.2 (9.2, 24.2) 45 (4, 77) 4
*
*
Dent County Rural No 19.2 (11.3, 31.1) 20 (1, 77) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 20.9 (12.3, 34.1) 15 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.9)
Miller County Rural No 12.4 (7.5, 19.7) 69 (12, 77) 4
*
*
New Madrid County Rural No 15.8 (9.6, 25.2) 37 (3, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Gasconade County Rural No 16.2 (9.9, 25.9) 34 (3, 77) 4
*
*
Saline County Rural No 13.3 (8.2, 20.8) 62 (6, 77) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.3)
Morgan County Rural No 14.2 (8.6, 22.4) 52 (6, 77) 5
*
*
Pike County Rural No 18.7 (11.8, 28.6) 24 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.2)
Randolph County Rural No 14.6 (9.1, 22.3) 50 (6, 77) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Crawford County Rural No 14.7 (9.2, 22.6) 48 (5, 77) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 16.3 (10.3, 24.8) 33 (3, 77) 5
*
*
Audrain County Rural No 15.1 (9.7, 22.7) 46 (5, 77) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Warren County Urban No 11.2 (7.1, 16.8) 73 (22, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Wright County Rural No 19.2 (12.5, 28.8) 21 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Ray County Urban No 16.6 (10.9, 24.7) 31 (3, 77) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.0)
Stone County Rural No 10.0 (6.3, 15.7) 76 (24, 77) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.1)
Henry County Rural No 15.6 (10.3, 23.2) 38 (4, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
McDonald County Rural No 21.0 (13.9, 30.6) 13 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Nodaway County Rural No 21.3 (13.9, 31.5) 11 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.6)
Vernon County Rural No 20.6 (13.6, 30.4) 16 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.4, 16.3)
Macon County Rural No 30.7 (20.0, 45.2) 1 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Pemiscot County Rural No 28.0 (18.7, 40.7) 2 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Polk County Urban No 15.5 (10.2, 22.6) 39 (5, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Ste. Genevieve County Rural No 22.1 (14.7, 32.3) 8 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Adair County Rural No 21.5 (14.6, 30.8) 10 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Benton County Rural No 16.9 (11.3, 25.4) 29 (3, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Lafayette County Urban No 15.9 (10.7, 22.8) 36 (5, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.8)
Pulaski County Rural No 16.9 (11.5, 23.8) 30 (4, 76) 7
*
*
Webster County Urban No 15.2 (10.4, 21.5) 44 (7, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Scott County Rural No 13.5 (9.2, 19.1) 58 (14, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Johnson County Rural No 13.4 (9.3, 18.7) 60 (14, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Marion County Rural No 19.9 (13.7, 28.0) 18 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Phelps County Rural No 13.6 (9.4, 19.2) 56 (14, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.4)
Texas County Rural No 20.9 (14.5, 29.5) 14 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Lawrence County Rural No 16.1 (11.3, 22.4) 35 (6, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Callaway County Urban No 14.0 (9.9, 19.2) 54 (13, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Laclede County Rural No 18.8 (13.5, 25.7) 23 (2, 71) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Howell County Rural No 15.3 (11.0, 20.8) 42 (8, 76) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Stoddard County Rural No 20.1 (14.6, 27.3) 17 (2, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Camden County Rural No 11.5 (8.3, 16.0) 71 (27, 77) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -2.0)
Pettis County Rural No 17.0 (12.3, 22.8) 28 (4, 74) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Cole County Urban No 10.1 (7.4, 13.5) 75 (41, 77) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.3)
Lincoln County Urban No 14.7 (10.8, 19.6) 47 (11, 76) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Dunklin County Rural No 26.3 (19.4, 35.1) 3 (1, 39) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Cape Girardeau County Urban No 10.7 (8.0, 14.2) 74 (38, 77) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
Taney County Rural No 12.6 (9.4, 16.7) 68 (20, 77) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Barry County Rural No 21.2 (15.9, 28.1) 12 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Newton County Urban No 16.6 (12.7, 21.3) 32 (8, 71) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Butler County Rural No 22.5 (17.4, 28.9) 6 (1, 49) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Buchanan County Urban No 13.2 (10.2, 16.8) 64 (21, 76) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.4)
Platte County Urban No 11.3 (8.8, 14.3) 72 (36, 77) 14 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
St. Francois County Rural No 18.5 (14.5, 23.3) 25 (4, 63) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Christian County Urban No 15.3 (12.1, 19.1) 41 (13, 73) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.4)
Franklin County Urban No 11.9 (9.4, 15.0) 70 (32, 77) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Cass County Urban No 13.9 (11.2, 17.0) 55 (23, 74) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Jasper County Urban No 15.4 (12.6, 18.6) 40 (16, 70) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Boone County Urban No 14.1 (11.7, 16.8) 53 (23, 72) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 13.3 (11.3, 15.6) 61 (28, 73) 34 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Clay County Urban No 13.5 (11.6, 15.6) 57 (29, 72) 37 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
St. Charles County Urban No 9.3 (8.1, 10.6) 77 (66, 77) 46 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.3, -2.9)
Greene County Urban No 13.0 (11.4, 14.9) 66 (35, 73) 47 stable stable trend 8.2 (-1.9, 16.0)
St. Louis City Urban No 15.3 (13.4, 17.3) 43 (22, 64) 51 falling falling trend -3.6 (-9.2, -2.3)
Jackson County Urban No 13.3 (12.2, 14.5) 63 (39, 69) 112 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
St. Louis County Urban No 13.2 (12.3, 14.1) 65 (42, 69) 177 stable stable trend 5.9 (-2.2, 9.8)
Atchison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bollinger County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chariton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mississippi County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moniteau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osage County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ozark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 8:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top