Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Montana *** 148.2 (145.2, 151.1) N/A 2,089 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Park County *** 150.7 (129.5, 174.9) 27 (6, 44) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.0)
Roosevelt County *** 185.6 (148.4, 229.0) 4 (1, 39) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Hill County *** 188.3 (160.5, 219.6) 3 (1, 29) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Sheridan County *** 176.5 (130.1, 237.3) 7 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Ravalli County *** 151.5 (138.6, 165.6) 26 (10, 39) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Toole County *** 175.6 (132.3, 229.9) 8 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Chouteau County *** 122.4 (91.3, 162.5) 44 (9, 49) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Deer Lodge County *** 183.9 (153.0, 220.5) 5 (1, 35) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Mineral County *** 159.1 (122.3, 207.9) 19 (1, 47) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Sweet Grass County *** 102.7 (70.7, 148.7) 49 (16, 49) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Glacier County *** 180.1 (148.6, 216.2) 6 (1, 38) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Teton County *** 141.6 (109.4, 181.9) 34 (3, 49) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Musselshell County *** 168.1 (129.2, 218.2) 10 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Custer County *** 193.2 (164.5, 226.1) 2 (1, 26) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Fallon County *** 148.4 (95.2, 221.5) 30 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Pondera County *** 169.8 (132.8, 215.3) 9 (1, 44) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Richland County *** 152.3 (122.6, 187.3) 24 (3, 47) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Dawson County *** 137.1 (109.5, 170.3) 37 (7, 49) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Judith Basin County *** 128.8 (80.9, 205.4) 41 (2, 49) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Meagher County *** 160.0 (104.9, 244.4) 18 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Missoula County *** 143.1 (133.8, 152.9) 33 (18, 41) 186 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Yellowstone County *** 154.5 (146.8, 162.6) 22 (12, 34) 311 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Blaine County *** 130.1 (95.7, 173.1) 39 (6, 49) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Jefferson County *** 161.3 (133.4, 193.9) 17 (2, 44) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Lake County *** 146.2 (130.3, 163.7) 31 (10, 43) 66 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Lewis and Clark County *** 153.8 (142.2, 166.1) 23 (10, 37) 141 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Lincoln County *** 162.6 (143.6, 184.2) 16 (3, 38) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Cascade County *** 154.9 (144.5, 165.9) 21 (10, 35) 174 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Gallatin County *** 116.6 (106.9, 126.9) 47 (36, 49) 114 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Powell County *** 166.0 (131.7, 208.0) 12 (1, 45) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Sanders County *** 157.6 (133.7, 185.7) 20 (3, 42) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Beaverhead County *** 140.5 (113.1, 173.5) 35 (6, 49) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Flathead County *** 143.2 (134.0, 152.9) 32 (17, 41) 193 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Daniels County *** 148.9 (89.5, 241.1) 29 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Rosebud County *** 165.2 (131.3, 205.5) 13 (1, 45) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Broadwater County *** 163.3 (126.8, 208.7) 14 (1, 47) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Fergus County *** 129.3 (107.0, 155.9) 40 (13, 49) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Liberty County *** 113.4 (69.9, 178.8) 48 (4, 49) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Phillips County *** 137.1 (99.9, 186.6) 36 (2, 49) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Stillwater County *** 149.0 (120.4, 183.3) 28 (4, 47) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Big Horn County *** 168.0 (136.0, 205.1) 11 (1, 43) 21 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Carbon County *** 118.6 (96.6, 145.4) 46 (21, 49) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Silver Bow County *** 163.0 (147.0, 180.4) 15 (5, 34) 80 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Valley County *** 121.4 (94.3, 155.2) 45 (13, 49) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Madison County *** 127.1 (103.2, 157.1) 42 (13, 49) 21 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Granite County *** 130.1 (92.4, 185.0) 38 (4, 49) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.9)
McCone County *** 126.1 (74.0, 210.6) 43 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Prairie County *** 244.7 (153.4, 387.1) 1 (1, 46) 5
*
*
Wheatland County *** 152.0 (95.1, 235.2) 25 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Carter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2021 7:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top