Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana N/A Yes 40.2 (38.5, 41.9) N/A 491 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Carbon County Urban Yes 27.9 (16.5, 46.6) 34 (10, 34) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.3)
Gallatin County Urban Yes 28.2 (23.8, 33.2) 33 (26, 34) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Fergus County Rural Yes 29.6 (17.5, 48.0) 32 (8, 34) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.8)
Park County Rural Yes 34.4 (23.7, 49.1) 31 (8, 34) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.4)
Chouteau County Rural Yes 34.9 (19.3, 62.0) 30 (4, 34) 3
*
*
Missoula County Urban Yes 35.2 (30.3, 40.6) 29 (17, 33) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Stillwater County Urban Yes 36.9 (22.1, 59.9) 28 (3, 34) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 2.1)
Madison County Rural Yes 37.4 (20.7, 64.1) 27 (3, 34) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.9)
Dawson County Rural Yes 37.5 (21.5, 61.8) 26 (3, 34) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Ravalli County Rural Yes 38.0 (30.4, 47.2) 25 (10, 33) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.2, 0.0)
Flathead County Rural Yes 39.2 (34.1, 44.8) 24 (12, 31) 49 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Big Horn County Rural Yes 39.4 (25.1, 59.0) 23 (3, 34) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Lewis and Clark County Urban Yes 40.8 (34.4, 48.2) 22 (9, 31) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Silver Bow County Rural Yes 41.6 (32.8, 52.3) 21 (6, 32) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Yellowstone County Urban Yes 42.4 (38.1, 47.1) 20 (10, 28) 77 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Cascade County Urban Yes 42.4 (36.4, 49.3) 19 (8, 29) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Custer County Rural Yes 42.8 (28.2, 63.3) 18 (2, 34) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Broadwater County Urban Yes 43.4 (24.3, 73.4) 17 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Urban Yes 45.0 (30.4, 65.5) 16 (2, 33) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.1)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 46.0 (33.5, 62.5) 15 (3, 32) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Lake County Rural Yes 46.2 (35.9, 58.8) 14 (3, 31) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Powell County Rural Yes 46.8 (29.0, 74.6) 13 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Glacier County Rural Yes 50.9 (35.7, 70.7) 12 (1, 32) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Deer Lodge County Rural Yes 50.9 (32.4, 78.0) 11 (1, 34) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Rosebud County Rural Yes 52.9 (31.6, 83.3) 10 (1, 34) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.1)
Richland County Rural Yes 53.8 (36.1, 77.4) 9 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Valley County Rural Yes 54.6 (33.1, 86.3) 8 (1, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.2)
Hill County Rural Yes 55.4 (39.3, 76.0) 7 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Sanders County Rural Yes 56.2 (39.5, 79.2) 6 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Musselshell County Rural Yes 59.1 (31.2, 104.4) 5 (1, 34) 3
*
*
Roosevelt County Rural Yes 61.9 (41.5, 88.9) 4 (1, 30) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Toole County Rural Yes 63.2 (37.8, 101.7) 3 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Pondera County Rural Yes 63.2 (37.2, 101.8) 2 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Mineral County Urban Yes 67.8 (38.4, 114.9) 1 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Beaverhead County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fallon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Judith Basin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meagher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sweet Grass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top