Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Montana N/A No 480.1 (470.7, 489.7) N/A 2,056 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Roosevelt County Rural No 661.5 (528.3, 817.9) 3 (1, 34) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Sheridan County Rural No 664.7 (507.3, 857.7) 2 (1, 38) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Chouteau County Rural No 492.2 (377.4, 631.8) 25 (2, 49) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Hill County Rural No 606.5 (513.6, 711.3) 6 (1, 32) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Sweet Grass County Rural No 397.6 (273.7, 557.4) 44 (6, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.1)
Toole County Rural No 616.8 (465.0, 802.4) 5 (1, 44) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Glacier County Rural No 599.7 (491.9, 724.1) 8 (1, 38) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Mineral County Urban No 517.9 (396.4, 665.4) 17 (2, 48) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 1.0)
Ravalli County Rural No 496.6 (455.8, 540.2) 20 (10, 38) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 650.1 (548.2, 765.0) 4 (1, 24) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Park County Rural No 505.5 (437.2, 581.5) 18 (6, 42) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Richland County Rural No 549.4 (446.5, 668.7) 12 (1, 43) 21 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Judith Basin County Rural No 584.0 (393.2, 836.6) 9 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Teton County Rural No 470.1 (368.6, 592.2) 31 (5, 49) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Custer County Rural No 575.7 (483.5, 680.4) 10 (1, 37) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Fallon County Rural No 467.8 (296.6, 700.0) 33 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Gallatin County Urban No 404.8 (372.7, 439.0) 43 (31, 48) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Pondera County Rural No 523.7 (408.4, 662.5) 16 (2, 47) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Yellowstone County Urban No 492.9 (468.0, 518.8) 23 (14, 36) 302 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Blaine County Rural No 458.8 (343.3, 601.2) 35 (3, 49) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Lake County Rural No 491.7 (440.8, 547.0) 26 (10, 41) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Liberty County Rural No 363.8 (204.4, 598.0) 48 (4, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Musselshell County Rural No 531.2 (407.9, 680.6) 14 (1, 47) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-18.0, 2.2)
Rosebud County Rural No 565.2 (443.5, 709.6) 11 (1, 45) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Cascade County Urban No 490.7 (457.5, 525.7) 27 (12, 38) 166 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Dawson County Rural No 444.6 (352.5, 553.7) 37 (8, 49) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Deer Lodge County Rural No 465.0 (379.5, 563.9) 34 (6, 48) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Lewis and Clark County Urban No 494.4 (457.3, 533.7) 22 (12, 38) 138 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 492.5 (434.1, 556.6) 24 (9, 42) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.7)
Powell County Rural No 501.5 (393.0, 630.7) 19 (3, 48) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Sanders County Rural No 524.9 (450.6, 608.1) 15 (4, 41) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Beaverhead County Rural No 443.5 (357.7, 544.1) 38 (9, 49) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.5)
Fergus County Rural No 489.0 (410.2, 579.1) 28 (6, 45) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Flathead County Rural No 469.4 (439.9, 500.3) 32 (17, 41) 199 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Meagher County Rural No 477.8 (303.1, 719.4) 30 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Silver Bow County Rural No 536.9 (483.7, 594.4) 13 (5, 35) 77 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.8, -1.1)
Carbon County Urban No 382.5 (310.4, 466.4) 45 (21, 50) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Big Horn County Rural No 602.4 (490.2, 732.1) 7 (1, 38) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Daniels County Rural No 450.3 (275.4, 703.5) 36 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Stillwater County Urban No 419.3 (334.7, 519.1) 42 (11, 50) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Phillips County Rural No 481.0 (357.3, 635.2) 29 (2, 49) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Valley County Rural No 420.3 (330.0, 528.3) 41 (11, 50) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Broadwater County Urban No 376.1 (285.7, 486.3) 46 (16, 50) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.9)
Madison County Rural No 365.6 (290.7, 454.3) 47 (24, 50) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Granite County Rural No 290.7 (192.0, 423.8) 50 (29, 50) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.0)
Missoula County Urban No 430.6 (401.2, 461.7) 40 (27, 46) 166 falling falling trend -4.5 (-10.3, -1.6)
Carter County Rural No 443.0 (250.3, 732.4) 39 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Powder River County Rural No 334.6 (183.8, 560.1) 49 (5, 50) 3
*
*
Prairie County Rural No 794.8 (484.4, 1,232.6) 1 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Wheatland County Rural No 496.0 (299.4, 771.6) 21 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 4:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top