Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana N/A No 843.3 (825.0, 862.0) N/A 1,642 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Broadwater County Urban No 618.5 (449.1, 830.6) 45 (17, 46) 9 falling falling trend -10.6 (-28.5, -2.2)
Carbon County Urban No 680.1 (539.6, 845.4) 40 (16, 46) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Cascade County Urban No 843.9 (780.3, 911.3) 26 (12, 37) 132 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Gallatin County Urban No 740.2 (674.9, 810.0) 38 (24, 43) 100 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 1,192.8 (986.1, 1,429.2) 3 (1, 20) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.5)
Lewis and Clark County Urban No 896.4 (822.2, 975.5) 19 (7, 34) 112 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Mineral County Urban No 767.9 (566.7, 1,018.4) 34 (5, 46) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 1.0)
Missoula County Urban No 762.2 (704.1, 823.8) 35 (22, 42) 133 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.2, -1.7)
Stillwater County Urban No 730.8 (565.6, 928.9) 39 (9, 46) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.8)
Yellowstone County Urban No 866.1 (817.1, 917.3) 22 (11, 33) 239 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Beaverhead County Rural No 812.7 (646.5, 1,008.1) 32 (5, 45) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Big Horn County Rural No 1,076.9 (852.5, 1,341.9) 5 (1, 36) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Blaine County Rural No 881.9 (643.3, 1,179.7) 20 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Chouteau County Rural No 835.3 (615.0, 1,108.1) 28 (2, 46) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Custer County Rural No 994.6 (819.6, 1,195.7) 8 (1, 36) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Dawson County Rural No 759.0 (587.2, 965.6) 36 (7, 46) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Deer Lodge County Rural No 831.7 (663.0, 1,029.5) 29 (5, 44) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Fallon County Rural No 807.5 (481.5, 1,265.4) 33 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.0)
Fergus County Rural No 902.4 (747.8, 1,079.3) 17 (3, 41) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Flathead County Rural No 818.1 (760.6, 878.7) 31 (15, 38) 157 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Glacier County Rural No 984.0 (774.3, 1,232.8) 10 (1, 40) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Granite County Rural No 513.7 (329.9, 762.8) 46 (21, 46) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Hill County Rural No 1,056.3 (875.9, 1,262.8) 7 (1, 32) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Judith Basin County Rural No 1,070.7 (703.7, 1,559.4) 6 (1, 45) 5
*
*
Lake County Rural No 854.8 (757.5, 961.0) 23 (9, 39) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Liberty County Rural No 620.5 (344.0, 1,034.5) 44 (5, 46) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 853.3 (743.4, 974.7) 25 (8, 41) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Madison County Rural No 649.5 (504.8, 821.8) 42 (18, 46) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Meagher County Rural No 751.7 (460.6, 1,156.4) 37 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.7)
Musselshell County Rural No 930.8 (696.7, 1,218.1) 13 (1, 44) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Park County Rural No 916.1 (781.2, 1,067.2) 15 (4, 39) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Phillips County Rural No 854.2 (611.3, 1,161.1) 24 (2, 46) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.9)
Pondera County Rural No 897.7 (673.8, 1,171.7) 18 (2, 45) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Powell County Rural No 822.2 (615.7, 1,075.3) 30 (3, 45) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Prairie County Rural No 1,231.5 (753.5, 1,898.1) 2 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Ravalli County Rural No 907.5 (826.8, 993.8) 16 (7, 33) 97 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Richland County Rural No 917.4 (719.9, 1,152.0) 14 (2, 43) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Roosevelt County Rural No 1,125.6 (863.4, 1,442.1) 4 (1, 37) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Rosebud County Rural No 976.0 (741.1, 1,261.1) 11 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Sanders County Rural No 835.6 (706.3, 981.6) 27 (7, 42) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.7)
Sheridan County Rural No 1,258.5 (938.1, 1,653.0) 1 (1, 34) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Silver Bow County Rural No 950.6 (846.3, 1,064.2) 12 (4, 32) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.4, -1.0)
Sweet Grass County Rural No 626.0 (425.8, 888.1) 43 (11, 46) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Teton County Rural No 880.3 (680.0, 1,121.6) 21 (2, 44) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Toole County Rural No 984.2 (697.8, 1,347.5) 9 (1, 45) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-18.7, -1.1)
Valley County Rural No 658.0 (499.5, 850.7) 41 (15, 46) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Carter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 8:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top