Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana No 125.6 (122.0, 129.4) N/A 954 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Mineral County No 203.4 (142.2, 290.5) 1 (1, 31) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Pondera County No 170.8 (123.1, 234.9) 2 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Musselshell County No 168.6 (118.3, 241.6) 3 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Sheridan County No 166.0 (110.2, 251.4) 4 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Roosevelt County No 162.6 (117.2, 219.7) 5 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Blaine County No 156.8 (107.2, 223.1) 6 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Jefferson County No 154.4 (117.6, 200.6) 7 (1, 36) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Sanders County No 153.6 (120.3, 196.0) 8 (1, 34) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Big Horn County No 152.2 (111.4, 202.8) 9 (1, 37) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Deer Lodge County No 150.5 (112.0, 201.4) 10 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Hill County No 149.3 (116.2, 189.3) 11 (1, 36) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Rosebud County No 142.8 (100.4, 198.0) 12 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Richland County No 140.8 (100.9, 191.5) 13 (1, 38) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Teton County No 138.7 (95.2, 198.6) 14 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Powell County No 136.7 (94.9, 198.1) 15 (1, 40) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Yellowstone County No 136.5 (126.8, 146.9) 16 (7, 26) 155 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Granite County No 136.1 (79.8, 231.3) 17 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.8)
Cascade County No 135.6 (122.4, 150.1) 18 (6, 29) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Lewis and Clark County No 134.0 (119.5, 150.0) 19 (7, 31) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Lake County No 129.9 (109.1, 154.0) 20 (5, 36) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Park County No 129.4 (103.5, 161.2) 21 (4, 37) 18 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.3, 6.1)
Stillwater County No 127.1 (91.1, 174.8) 22 (2, 40) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Custer County No 123.5 (92.6, 163.1) 23 (3, 40) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Lincoln County No 122.9 (101.2, 149.6) 24 (7, 38) 24 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Beaverhead County Yes 122.1 (87.7, 168.2) 25 (3, 40) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Silver Bow County Yes 121.9 (103.3, 143.3) 26 (9, 37) 32 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Missoula County Yes 121.0 (109.6, 133.4) 27 (13, 36) 86 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Carbon County Yes 120.4 (89.8, 161.1) 28 (4, 40) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Toole County Yes 118.9 (69.3, 195.2) 29 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Ravalli County Yes 114.8 (99.9, 131.9) 30 (14, 38) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Broadwater County Yes 114.1 (75.9, 170.0) 31 (3, 40) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Gallatin County Yes 113.3 (100.3, 127.5) 32 (16, 38) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Chouteau County Yes 112.5 (74.4, 168.4) 33 (3, 40) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Flathead County Yes 112.4 (101.3, 124.4) 34 (19, 38) 81 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Glacier County Yes 111.5 (79.8, 151.9) 35 (6, 40) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Valley County Yes 103.6 (68.7, 152.9) 36 (6, 40) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Phillips County Yes 100.8 (60.4, 167.6) 37 (4, 40) 4 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Fergus County Yes 90.9 (65.3, 125.6) 38 (16, 40) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Dawson County Yes 86.4 (57.3, 127.6) 39 (15, 40) 6 falling falling trend -15.0 (-27.1, -1.0)
Madison County Yes 79.6 (55.0, 117.4) 40 (24, 40) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Carter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fallon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Judith Basin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meagher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sweet Grass County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/20/2024 9:04 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top