Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana N/A No 141.7 (139.0, 144.5) N/A 2,133 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.4)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Yellowstone County Urban No 146.5 (139.2, 154.1) 24 (14, 36) 316 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Flathead County Rural No 137.6 (129.1, 146.6) 34 (19, 41) 206 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Missoula County Urban No 127.1 (118.5, 136.1) 41 (28, 46) 174 falling falling trend -4.4 (-10.7, -1.6)
Cascade County Urban No 143.7 (134.0, 154.0) 28 (14, 39) 171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Lewis and Clark County Urban No 148.9 (137.9, 160.7) 20 (10, 37) 145 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Gallatin County Urban Yes 118.2 (109.0, 127.9) 43 (33, 48) 131 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Ravalli County Rural No 147.9 (135.6, 161.3) 23 (10, 38) 118 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Silver Bow County Rural No 156.5 (141.1, 173.3) 16 (6, 35) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.5, -1.1)
Lake County Rural No 148.4 (133.0, 165.4) 21 (8, 40) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 148.1 (130.1, 168.5) 22 (7, 43) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Park County Rural No 145.8 (126.1, 168.3) 25 (6, 44) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 5.6)
Sanders County Rural No 154.7 (132.3, 181.1) 18 (3, 42) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 190.1 (160.6, 224.1) 4 (1, 26) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.2)
Hill County Rural No 181.9 (154.7, 212.7) 5 (1, 30) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Custer County Rural No 163.1 (137.1, 193.3) 12 (2, 41) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Fergus County Rural No 139.9 (117.2, 166.7) 32 (7, 48) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Glacier County Rural No 168.8 (138.7, 203.5) 10 (1, 40) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Deer Lodge County Rural No 149.6 (122.2, 182.7) 19 (3, 46) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Big Horn County Rural No 170.5 (139.0, 206.9) 7 (1, 41) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Richland County Rural No 162.9 (133.0, 197.8) 14 (1, 43) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Carbon County Urban Yes 110.3 (89.5, 135.9) 48 (24, 50) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Beaverhead County Rural No 128.8 (103.7, 159.3) 39 (10, 50) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.4)
Roosevelt County Rural No 196.3 (158.0, 241.0) 2 (1, 30) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Stillwater County Urban No 124.6 (99.4, 155.5) 42 (11, 50) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Madison County Rural Yes 114.8 (90.5, 145.2) 45 (17, 50) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.1)
Dawson County Rural No 128.7 (102.1, 160.9) 40 (8, 50) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Valley County Rural No 130.9 (102.5, 166.0) 38 (7, 50) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Rosebud County Rural No 169.6 (133.6, 212.5) 8 (1, 45) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Pondera County Rural No 168.6 (131.2, 214.8) 11 (1, 45) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Powell County Rural No 144.8 (113.7, 183.3) 26 (3, 48) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Teton County Rural No 134.9 (105.4, 172.0) 36 (5, 50) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Musselshell County Rural No 169.2 (129.3, 220.1) 9 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Mineral County Urban No 156.3 (118.7, 205.2) 17 (1, 48) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.7)
Broadwater County Urban Yes 116.1 (88.0, 151.7) 44 (12, 50) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Chouteau County Rural No 136.0 (104.3, 176.2) 35 (5, 50) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Sheridan County Rural No 191.2 (145.6, 250.3) 3 (1, 41) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Toole County Rural No 179.6 (136.0, 233.9) 6 (1, 44) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Blaine County Rural No 143.7 (108.2, 187.5) 29 (3, 49) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Phillips County Rural No 140.3 (103.6, 188.7) 31 (2, 50) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Sweet Grass County Rural Yes 109.9 (75.6, 158.5) 49 (9, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Granite County Rural Yes 88.7 (57.8, 137.3) 50 (23, 50) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.2)
Judith Basin County Rural No 161.4 (108.7, 239.3) 15 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Meagher County Rural No 132.0 (83.8, 209.3) 37 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Fallon County Rural No 138.3 (88.3, 207.7) 33 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Prairie County Rural No 219.6 (133.9, 358.8) 1 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Wheatland County Rural No 163.0 (99.8, 254.6) 13 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Daniels County Rural No 143.9 (85.3, 236.2) 27 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.2)
Liberty County Rural Yes 111.3 (63.4, 186.9) 47 (3, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.5)
Carter County Rural No 141.8 (79.3, 246.5) 30 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Powder River County Rural Yes 112.1 (59.2, 201.7) 46 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top