Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana No 143.6 (140.6, 146.5) N/A 1,958 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Yellowstone County No 151.0 (143.2, 159.1) 17 (9, 33) 297 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Flathead County No 138.1 (129.0, 147.6) 33 (17, 42) 187 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Missoula County No 137.8 (128.6, 147.5) 34 (17, 42) 176 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Cascade County No 148.3 (137.9, 159.3) 22 (9, 37) 160 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Lewis and Clark County No 149.9 (138.4, 162.3) 20 (8, 36) 135 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Gallatin County No 123.4 (113.5, 134.0) 43 (28, 48) 121 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Ravalli County No 153.1 (140.1, 167.2) 14 (6, 36) 113 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Silver Bow County No 150.8 (135.2, 167.9) 18 (5, 39) 72 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Lincoln County No 152.9 (134.3, 174.0) 15 (4, 41) 56 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.7, 6.2)
Lake County No 131.1 (114.6, 149.9) 41 (15, 47) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Park County No 154.1 (132.7, 178.7) 13 (3, 41) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.0)
Sanders County No 159.0 (133.7, 189.0) 12 (2, 42) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Custer County No 191.5 (162.2, 225.4) 2 (1, 25) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 159.6 (132.2, 191.9) 11 (2, 43) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Hill County No 162.4 (134.5, 194.8) 8 (1, 41) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Fergus County No 132.4 (109.7, 159.7) 39 (8, 49) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Deer Lodge County No 169.3 (139.4, 205.4) 7 (1, 39) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Carbon County Yes 119.5 (97.5, 146.4) 45 (15, 50) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Beaverhead County No 144.6 (116.4, 178.7) 24 (3, 48) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Richland County No 171.6 (139.1, 209.7) 6 (1, 42) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Stillwater County No 130.9 (104.5, 163.3) 42 (5, 49) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Madison County Yes 109.2 (87.4, 137.4) 48 (24, 50) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Dawson County No 134.2 (105.8, 168.8) 37 (5, 49) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Powell County No 160.6 (126.7, 202.8) 9 (1, 46) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Teton County No 152.1 (118.4, 194.1) 16 (2, 47) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Musselshell County No 175.8 (135.8, 228.0) 4 (1, 44) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Mineral County No 180.3 (138.9, 234.6) 3 (1, 43) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Valley County Yes 121.7 (93.4, 157.7) 44 (7, 50) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Broadwater County No 148.5 (113.2, 193.3) 21 (1, 49) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Pondera County No 144.3 (110.7, 187.4) 25 (2, 49) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Chouteau County No 138.6 (104.7, 183.3) 32 (2, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Rosebud County No 145.5 (108.7, 192.8) 23 (2, 49) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Toole County No 175.7 (131.0, 232.6) 5 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Sheridan County No 160.5 (119.3, 216.8) 10 (1, 48) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Big Horn County No 142.3 (101.9, 197.6) 29 (1, 50) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Roosevelt County No 150.1 (109.1, 204.2) 19 (1, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Glacier County No 143.2 (103.7, 194.6) 26 (1, 50) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Phillips County No 139.4 (101.4, 191.6) 31 (2, 50) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Sweet Grass County Yes 113.1 (78.7, 162.4) 46 (7, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Granite County Yes 110.4 (75.3, 164.3) 47 (7, 50) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.3)
Blaine County No 135.6 (94.6, 193.0) 36 (2, 50) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Meagher County No 141.1 (89.3, 223.9) 30 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Prairie County No 241.7 (144.1, 399.7) 1 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Fallon County No 133.2 (82.6, 204.7) 38 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Judith Basin County No 131.8 (82.2, 211.1) 40 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Wheatland County No 142.6 (85.8, 228.3) 28 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Daniels County No 143.1 (82.5, 241.0) 27 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
McCone County No 137.0 (80.8, 228.3) 35 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Liberty County Yes 90.3 (51.4, 152.4) 50 (9, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Powder River County Yes 92.0 (51.8, 168.3) 49 (6, 50) 3
*
*
Carter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top