Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 147.6 (145.4, 149.8) N/A 3,521 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Thurston County Rural No 303.7 (242.9, 374.6) 1 (1, 5) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Hitchcock County Rural No 234.4 (171.3, 317.4) 2 (1, 58) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Nance County Rural No 230.6 (170.3, 307.3) 3 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Webster County Rural No 209.6 (157.8, 276.2) 4 (1, 68) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 14.7)
Greeley County Rural No 187.5 (122.1, 278.8) 5 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Franklin County Rural No 185.1 (134.2, 253.4) 6 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 9.2 (-1.4, 40.3)
Nemaha County Rural No 182.3 (145.7, 226.2) 7 (2, 70) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Butler County Rural No 178.9 (146.2, 217.6) 8 (2, 69) 23 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 16.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 175.8 (144.5, 213.6) 9 (2, 70) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Dawes County Rural No 172.3 (137.7, 213.7) 10 (2, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Cheyenne County Rural No 171.3 (140.8, 207.2) 11 (3, 70) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Gage County Rural No 168.6 (148.9, 190.7) 12 (4, 56) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Nuckolls County Rural No 168.6 (128.8, 220.4) 13 (2, 76) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Harlan County Rural No 168.2 (124.3, 228.0) 14 (2, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.6)
Richardson County Rural No 166.5 (136.8, 202.4) 15 (3, 71) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Gosper County Rural No 164.9 (100.9, 259.5) 16 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.9)
Clay County Rural No 164.4 (126.7, 210.9) 17 (3, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Dodge County Rural No 163.5 (148.1, 180.3) 18 (7, 54) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Johnson County Rural No 162.7 (123.9, 211.4) 19 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Boyd County Rural No 162.1 (106.3, 247.9) 20 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Colfax County Rural No 161.6 (129.6, 199.2) 21 (3, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 161.3 (145.9, 178.1) 22 (7, 59) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Burt County Rural No 160.1 (126.4, 201.4) 23 (3, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Keith County Rural No 157.3 (128.8, 191.6) 24 (4, 75) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Pawnee County Rural No 156.9 (104.3, 231.2) 25 (2, 78) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.3)
Red Willow County Rural No 155.4 (129.1, 186.2) 26 (4, 75) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Kimball County Rural No 155.4 (111.1, 214.9) 27 (2, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Perkins County Rural No 154.2 (104.6, 222.6) 28 (2, 78) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.0)
Box Butte County Rural No 154.0 (126.5, 186.3) 29 (5, 76) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Furnas County Rural No 153.8 (114.3, 204.5) 30 (2, 78) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Adams County Rural No 153.0 (136.5, 171.1) 31 (9, 69) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Douglas County Urban No 152.8 (148.3, 157.3) 32 (20, 47) 918 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.3)
Seward County Urban No 151.6 (129.7, 176.5) 33 (7, 73) 36 falling falling trend -1.6 (-6.1, -0.7)
Otoe County Rural No 151.5 (129.7, 176.4) 34 (7, 74) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Brown County Rural No 150.5 (104.0, 215.0) 35 (3, 78) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.3)
Washington County Urban No 149.1 (129.1, 171.6) 36 (9, 74) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Chase County Rural No 148.6 (107.8, 202.3) 37 (3, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Thayer County Rural No 148.5 (111.2, 196.3) 38 (4, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Saunders County Urban No 146.3 (127.6, 167.2) 39 (11, 73) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Sarpy County Urban No 146.3 (138.3, 154.5) 40 (24, 63) 264 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Holt County Rural No 146.1 (119.1, 178.2) 41 (6, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Dixon County Rural No 146.0 (112.3, 188.4) 42 (4, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Hamilton County Rural No 145.8 (117.9, 179.0) 43 (7, 77) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
York County Rural No 145.6 (123.4, 171.2) 44 (8, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Valley County Rural No 145.3 (104.9, 198.5) 45 (3, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Merrick County Urban No 144.9 (114.5, 182.0) 46 (5, 78) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Phelps County Rural No 144.1 (117.0, 176.5) 47 (8, 78) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Deuel County Rural No 144.0 (89.8, 227.9) 48 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.1)
Morrill County Rural No 142.7 (105.3, 191.1) 49 (4, 78) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Polk County Rural No 142.7 (107.8, 187.4) 50 (5, 78) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 142.3 (127.5, 158.6) 51 (18, 73) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Lancaster County Urban No 141.8 (136.2, 147.7) 52 (33, 64) 490 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Buffalo County Rural No 139.9 (126.4, 154.5) 53 (21, 74) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Hall County Urban No 139.8 (127.7, 152.8) 54 (24, 72) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Fillmore County Rural No 139.7 (109.0, 178.8) 55 (6, 78) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Platte County Rural No 139.6 (124.1, 156.6) 56 (19, 75) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Cedar County Rural No 139.5 (110.8, 174.2) 57 (7, 78) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Dawson County Rural No 138.6 (120.3, 159.0) 58 (15, 76) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Sherman County Rural No 138.5 (96.0, 198.5) 59 (3, 78) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Cass County Urban No 137.4 (120.0, 156.8) 60 (18, 77) 48 falling falling trend -4.9 (-13.5, -1.3)
Madison County Rural No 136.9 (121.4, 153.9) 61 (20, 76) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Dakota County Urban No 136.5 (115.3, 160.5) 62 (13, 77) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Pierce County Rural No 135.5 (105.4, 172.5) 63 (8, 78) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Garfield County Rural No 135.5 (85.4, 215.0) 64 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Boone County Rural No 135.2 (104.9, 173.9) 65 (7, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Wayne County Rural No 135.1 (105.5, 170.9) 66 (7, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Cuming County Rural No 134.9 (107.9, 167.5) 67 (9, 78) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Howard County Urban No 134.8 (104.1, 173.1) 68 (8, 78) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Custer County Rural No 134.0 (109.3, 163.4) 69 (10, 78) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Garden County Rural No 132.4 (88.5, 203.9) 70 (4, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Cherry County Rural No 132.0 (98.9, 174.3) 71 (7, 78) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Knox County Rural No 131.8 (105.7, 163.8) 72 (11, 78) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Kearney County Rural No 129.4 (99.0, 167.4) 73 (8, 78) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.8)
Stanton County Rural No 129.0 (95.7, 171.4) 74 (8, 78) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Antelope County Rural No 124.3 (93.6, 163.3) 75 (11, 78) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Saline County Rural Yes 121.7 (99.6, 147.6) 76 (24, 78) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Sheridan County Rural Yes 120.5 (91.7, 158.5) 77 (13, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Frontier County Rural Yes 103.9 (65.7, 162.4) 78 (11, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.7)
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 6:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top