Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska Yes 46.1 (44.7, 47.5) N/A 919 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Furnas County Yes 87.4 (51.3, 140.6) 1 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Thurston County Yes 82.5 (51.6, 124.5) 2 (1, 45) 5
*
*
Thayer County Yes 63.8 (34.6, 109.4) 3 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Dodge County Yes 63.3 (51.9, 76.5) 4 (1, 32) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Burt County Yes 60.9 (35.6, 98.6) 5 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Cheyenne County Yes 60.7 (40.1, 89.0) 6 (1, 48) 6
*
*
Dawes County Yes 60.1 (36.4, 93.8) 7 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Butler County Yes 59.8 (39.5, 88.6) 8 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.7, 0.0)
Richardson County Yes 59.4 (39.1, 88.6) 9 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Custer County Yes 58.5 (39.5, 84.4) 10 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Hamilton County Yes 58.2 (38.5, 85.5) 11 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Saline County Yes 58.2 (41.0, 80.2) 12 (1, 48) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Adams County Yes 57.1 (45.6, 70.8) 13 (2, 41) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Nemaha County Yes 57.0 (33.9, 90.9) 14 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Cass County Yes 55.1 (43.4, 69.3) 15 (2, 44) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Gage County Yes 54.8 (41.9, 70.8) 16 (2, 46) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Cuming County Yes 54.0 (34.2, 82.0) 17 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Keith County Yes 53.6 (31.9, 85.4) 18 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Johnson County Yes 53.5 (30.6, 90.1) 19 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Clay County Yes 52.3 (29.4, 87.4) 20 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Phelps County Yes 52.0 (33.0, 79.0) 21 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Saunders County Yes 51.8 (39.5, 67.2) 22 (3, 47) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Dakota County Yes 51.8 (38.0, 69.0) 23 (3, 49) 10 stable stable trend -23.9 (-49.6, 14.9)
Washington County Yes 50.1 (37.6, 65.7) 24 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Red Willow County Yes 49.7 (31.8, 74.6) 25 (2, 50) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Holt County Yes 49.7 (31.3, 75.6) 26 (2, 50) 6
*
*
Hall County Yes 49.0 (41.3, 57.7) 27 (8, 45) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Dixon County Yes 48.5 (26.3, 83.8) 28 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Merrick County Yes 47.7 (28.3, 76.4) 29 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Buffalo County Yes 47.2 (38.6, 57.3) 30 (9, 47) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Seward County Yes 47.1 (33.1, 65.3) 31 (4, 50) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Colfax County Yes 46.2 (28.5, 70.7) 32 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Lincoln County Yes 46.0 (36.5, 57.5) 33 (9, 49) 18 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Platte County Yes 45.3 (35.0, 57.8) 34 (8, 49) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Scotts Bluff County Yes 44.9 (35.0, 56.7) 35 (8, 49) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Douglas County Yes 44.8 (42.3, 47.4) 36 (22, 42) 257 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Lancaster County Yes 44.2 (40.8, 47.9) 37 (21, 44) 132 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Madison County Yes 44.2 (34.7, 55.6) 38 (10, 49) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Kearney County Yes 43.9 (24.0, 74.8) 39 (2, 50) 3 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Pierce County Yes 43.4 (24.7, 72.1) 40 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Fillmore County Yes 42.2 (23.0, 74.3) 41 (3, 50) 3
*
*
Otoe County Yes 41.7 (29.0, 58.5) 42 (7, 50) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Wayne County Yes 41.6 (24.1, 67.6) 43 (3, 50) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Knox County Yes 41.5 (24.5, 67.6) 44 (4, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Cedar County Yes 38.7 (22.0, 64.4) 45 (4, 50) 4
*
*
Sarpy County Yes 38.3 (34.3, 42.6) 46 (31, 49) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
York County Yes 37.9 (24.8, 56.1) 47 (9, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Dawson County Yes 36.5 (26.2, 49.7) 48 (17, 50) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Box Butte County Yes 35.8 (21.7, 56.5) 49 (9, 50) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Jefferson County Yes 35.0 (20.5, 59.1) 50 (8, 50) 4
*
*
Antelope County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arthur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nuckolls County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/06/2023 11:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top