Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska No 506.0 (498.3, 513.9) N/A 3,337 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Loup County No 1,063.7 (572.9, 1,786.4) 1 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Thurston County No 785.5 (614.7, 988.8) 2 (1, 42) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Butler County No 737.1 (612.5, 879.5) 3 (1, 33) 26 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.1, 8.6)
Webster County No 717.2 (547.1, 924.3) 4 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Hitchcock County No 665.7 (477.7, 903.0) 5 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Nance County No 662.0 (485.0, 881.7) 6 (1, 74) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Kimball County No 657.1 (502.8, 845.4) 7 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Chase County No 616.8 (458.3, 812.9) 8 (1, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Johnson County No 609.8 (466.8, 782.8) 9 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Deuel County No 598.1 (395.1, 869.4) 10 (1, 81) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 596.5 (487.9, 722.8) 11 (2, 68) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Dodge County No 592.8 (538.4, 651.2) 12 (5, 39) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
Dawes County No 582.3 (467.5, 716.5) 13 (2, 73) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Fillmore County No 580.5 (457.8, 726.4) 14 (2, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Nuckolls County No 569.3 (444.1, 721.2) 15 (2, 75) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Richardson County No 568.3 (469.7, 682.1) 16 (3, 70) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Red Willow County No 554.0 (463.6, 657.4) 17 (4, 70) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Lincoln County No 553.5 (499.5, 611.8) 18 (7, 56) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Seward County No 551.9 (471.9, 641.6) 19 (5, 69) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Garden County No 548.7 (367.4, 791.7) 20 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Saline County No 541.9 (450.5, 646.4) 21 (4, 73) 26 stable stable trend -14.6 (-30.3, 4.5)
Nemaha County No 538.7 (425.9, 673.0) 22 (3, 77) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Adams County No 536.4 (479.1, 598.6) 23 (8, 62) 66 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Franklin County No 535.2 (385.0, 726.0) 24 (2, 81) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Washington County No 533.3 (462.0, 612.3) 25 (7, 69) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Douglas County No 532.4 (516.2, 548.9) 26 (17, 43) 854 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Gage County No 530.5 (466.8, 600.5) 27 (8, 67) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Kearney County No 529.6 (413.8, 668.0) 28 (3, 79) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Dakota County No 529.4 (449.5, 619.3) 29 (6, 70) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Phelps County No 526.9 (431.4, 637.6) 30 (5, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Merrick County No 525.8 (422.1, 647.4) 31 (5, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Boone County No 520.3 (403.5, 661.4) 32 (4, 79) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Saunders County No 517.7 (451.6, 590.8) 33 (8, 70) 45 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Perkins County No 516.3 (361.9, 718.0) 34 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Furnas County No 513.1 (389.3, 664.5) 35 (3, 80) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Keith County No 510.5 (416.9, 619.1) 36 (6, 76) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Harlan County No 508.8 (369.8, 683.8) 37 (3, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Box Butte County No 508.2 (414.4, 617.0) 38 (6, 77) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Cheyenne County No 505.8 (409.9, 617.5) 39 (6, 78) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Burt County No 505.5 (402.5, 627.4) 40 (5, 78) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Hall County No 503.3 (460.0, 549.5) 41 (15, 66) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Boyd County No 502.3 (331.6, 733.7) 42 (2, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Sheridan County No 502.1 (390.5, 637.2) 43 (5, 79) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Buffalo County No 499.4 (450.4, 552.3) 44 (15, 69) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cass County No 498.0 (436.7, 565.5) 45 (11, 72) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Otoe County No 496.0 (423.4, 577.7) 46 (9, 75) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Sarpy County No 490.3 (461.9, 520.0) 47 (25, 65) 231 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Platte County No 489.0 (434.9, 548.1) 48 (16, 72) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Scotts Bluff County No 486.3 (436.3, 540.6) 49 (18, 73) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
York County No 485.7 (409.6, 572.2) 50 (10, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Thayer County No 483.2 (369.6, 621.6) 51 (5, 81) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Lancaster County No 479.7 (459.7, 500.4) 52 (32, 64) 448 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Hamilton County No 474.5 (381.8, 583.0) 53 (8, 79) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Cedar County No 473.0 (378.6, 583.8) 54 (8, 80) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Howard County No 469.7 (361.6, 600.0) 55 (6, 81) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Clay County No 469.4 (357.5, 605.2) 56 (5, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Dixon County No 468.5 (357.5, 604.4) 57 (6, 80) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Pierce County No 462.0 (358.3, 586.4) 58 (8, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Madison County No 461.0 (408.0, 519.0) 59 (22, 75) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Valley County No 458.0 (338.9, 606.9) 60 (6, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Dawson County No 455.9 (392.9, 526.2) 61 (17, 78) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Dundy County No 447.1 (270.7, 699.2) 62 (3, 81) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.0)
Antelope County No 446.3 (341.7, 572.5) 63 (8, 81) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Garfield County No 443.5 (281.6, 666.7) 64 (3, 81) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Brown County No 442.5 (307.2, 619.3) 65 (4, 81) 7 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Custer County No 439.9 (360.7, 531.6) 66 (16, 81) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Holt County No 432.1 (351.2, 526.4) 67 (16, 80) 21 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Gosper County No 428.3 (264.7, 657.4) 68 (3, 81) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Knox County No 420.5 (336.6, 519.4) 69 (17, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Sherman County No 416.4 (290.7, 580.6) 70 (7, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Rock County No 415.3 (235.1, 693.4) 71 (2, 81) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Wayne County No 414.3 (319.5, 528.6) 72 (13, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Polk County No 411.4 (304.0, 544.8) 73 (11, 81) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Cherry County No 405.5 (304.7, 529.7) 74 (13, 81) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Colfax County No 403.9 (310.9, 515.8) 75 (19, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.6)
Stanton County No 402.9 (294.5, 538.2) 76 (13, 81) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Cuming County No 394.4 (313.7, 490.1) 77 (27, 81) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Greeley County No 385.4 (246.0, 578.3) 78 (8, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.5)
Pawnee County No 366.4 (244.3, 532.4) 79 (11, 81) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Morrill County No 365.5 (260.7, 499.9) 80 (18, 81) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Frontier County No 319.2 (195.6, 494.8) 81 (21, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Arthur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 7:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top