Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 496.7 (489.1, 504.4) N/A 3,357 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Thurston County Rural No 991.3 (787.4, 1,231.2) 1 (1, 5) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Nance County Rural No 805.2 (593.6, 1,066.2) 2 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Hitchcock County Rural No 768.2 (564.2, 1,023.4) 3 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Webster County Rural No 697.5 (527.3, 906.7) 4 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 14.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 636.3 (523.0, 767.5) 5 (2, 57) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural No 631.9 (461.0, 846.4) 6 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend 7.7 (-0.8, 36.5)
Butler County Rural No 611.4 (499.7, 740.6) 7 (2, 62) 22 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 16.0)
Harlan County Rural No 608.5 (449.8, 806.4) 8 (2, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Nemaha County Rural No 580.2 (462.9, 719.1) 9 (2, 74) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Richardson County Rural No 575.1 (473.6, 692.5) 10 (3, 70) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Johnson County Rural No 573.3 (435.9, 740.0) 11 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Gage County Rural No 566.8 (500.2, 639.8) 12 (4, 54) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 560.9 (507.1, 618.9) 13 (6, 49) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Nuckolls County Rural No 558.7 (430.7, 715.5) 14 (2, 76) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
Dawes County Rural No 557.5 (445.2, 689.4) 15 (3, 74) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Cheyenne County Rural No 549.7 (451.2, 663.7) 16 (3, 72) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Dodge County Rural No 542.5 (490.8, 598.2) 17 (7, 55) 83 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Greeley County Rural No 526.1 (347.0, 767.5) 18 (2, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Box Butte County Rural No 521.1 (427.5, 629.5) 19 (4, 75) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.0)
Deuel County Rural No 520.9 (325.1, 789.1) 20 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.2)
Boyd County Rural No 520.7 (354.4, 747.6) 21 (2, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Seward County Urban No 520.2 (444.6, 605.0) 22 (6, 72) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.5, -0.7)
Colfax County Rural No 519.2 (412.1, 645.5) 23 (4, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Adams County Rural No 517.7 (461.4, 579.0) 24 (9, 66) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Keith County Rural No 517.5 (426.4, 623.0) 25 (5, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Douglas County Urban No 517.1 (501.5, 533.1) 26 (18, 45) 868 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -1.3)
Clay County Rural No 514.4 (395.4, 658.3) 27 (3, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Red Willow County Rural No 513.1 (427.4, 611.6) 28 (5, 75) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Chase County Rural No 512.8 (372.3, 690.3) 29 (3, 78) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Dixon County Rural No 511.1 (393.4, 654.3) 30 (4, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Otoe County Rural No 507.9 (434.3, 590.4) 31 (7, 73) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Fillmore County Rural No 505.4 (394.4, 638.8) 32 (4, 78) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Burt County Rural No 499.2 (396.8, 620.7) 33 (5, 78) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Sarpy County Urban No 498.1 (470.3, 527.2) 34 (18, 61) 249 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Washington County Urban No 497.7 (429.8, 573.1) 35 (9, 73) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Kimball County Rural No 497.1 (359.8, 670.5) 36 (3, 78) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
York County Rural No 496.9 (421.7, 582.1) 37 (8, 74) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Perkins County Rural No 496.6 (335.1, 710.3) 38 (2, 78) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Saunders County Urban No 493.2 (429.8, 563.4) 39 (10, 73) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Garfield County Rural No 490.2 (309.0, 741.0) 40 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.8)
Gosper County Rural No 489.9 (299.1, 756.3) 41 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Boone County Rural No 489.1 (379.7, 621.8) 42 (4, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Phelps County Rural No 488.5 (397.1, 595.2) 43 (6, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hamilton County Rural No 487.6 (393.9, 597.1) 44 (7, 78) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Brown County Rural No 480.7 (332.8, 673.7) 45 (3, 78) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Garden County Rural No 479.2 (320.3, 696.6) 46 (3, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Lancaster County Urban No 479.1 (459.5, 499.4) 47 (30, 63) 466 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Cedar County Rural No 478.8 (380.9, 594.1) 48 (6, 78) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Polk County Rural No 478.4 (362.0, 621.1) 49 (5, 78) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Merrick County Urban No 476.4 (375.7, 595.9) 50 (6, 78) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Dawson County Rural No 474.0 (410.8, 544.4) 51 (13, 76) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Pawnee County Rural No 471.5 (323.7, 666.4) 52 (3, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.7)
Buffalo County Rural No 471.0 (424.6, 521.1) 53 (19, 73) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Dakota County Urban No 470.3 (396.2, 554.1) 54 (11, 77) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Platte County Rural No 466.8 (414.4, 524.1) 55 (18, 75) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hall County Urban No 466.4 (425.2, 510.6) 56 (23, 72) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Furnas County Rural No 464.8 (348.9, 608.1) 57 (5, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 8.1)
Howard County Urban No 461.9 (356.3, 589.3) 58 (6, 78) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Sherman County Rural No 460.2 (324.4, 636.3) 59 (4, 78) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 459.3 (410.9, 511.9) 60 (21, 75) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Morrill County Rural No 456.5 (336.6, 606.7) 61 (5, 78) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Holt County Rural No 454.1 (371.7, 549.9) 62 (11, 78) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Pierce County Rural No 451.4 (350.7, 572.4) 63 (8, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Thayer County Rural No 450.0 (340.9, 584.2) 64 (6, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Cass County Urban No 445.3 (387.5, 509.2) 65 (21, 77) 45 falling falling trend -4.7 (-13.1, -1.6)
Custer County Rural No 445.1 (363.9, 539.3) 66 (12, 78) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Madison County Rural No 443.3 (391.8, 499.6) 67 (26, 77) 57 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Valley County Rural No 442.9 (324.7, 591.8) 68 (7, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Cherry County Rural No 442.1 (331.5, 578.5) 69 (6, 78) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Cuming County Rural No 440.9 (353.5, 543.6) 70 (11, 78) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Kearney County Rural No 440.6 (336.5, 567.3) 71 (8, 78) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Knox County Rural No 438.9 (353.7, 539.4) 72 (12, 78) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Sheridan County Rural No 436.2 (331.8, 564.5) 73 (8, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Wayne County Rural No 430.7 (335.3, 545.2) 74 (10, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Antelope County Rural No 430.7 (325.0, 559.3) 75 (8, 78) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Stanton County Rural No 418.8 (309.5, 554.3) 76 (9, 78) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Saline County Rural No 415.1 (338.6, 503.9) 77 (20, 78) 21 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Frontier County Rural No 375.8 (237.7, 567.4) 78 (6, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 10:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top