Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 173.9 (170.3, 177.5) N/A 1,861 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Greeley County Rural No 198.8 (110.1, 338.8) 16 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Perkins County Rural No 205.3 (126.5, 321.4) 12 (1, 72) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Sherman County Rural No 170.2 (105.1, 271.1) 44 (2, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Hitchcock County Rural No 223.1 (139.4, 348.6) 6 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Pawnee County Rural No 215.7 (133.5, 341.5) 8 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.1)
Kimball County Rural No 169.1 (109.5, 258.7) 45 (3, 72) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Brown County Rural No 226.7 (147.8, 341.3) 5 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 206.5 (129.2, 322.0) 11 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend 6.2 (-3.2, 36.5)
Morrill County Rural No 164.2 (107.0, 244.4) 50 (3, 72) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.6)
Stanton County Rural No 135.9 (88.6, 202.0) 72 (9, 72) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.2)
Valley County Rural No 161.7 (107.0, 241.1) 53 (3, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.0)
Dixon County Rural No 157.2 (104.3, 229.8) 59 (4, 72) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.1)
Webster County Rural No 246.0 (162.3, 362.3) 3 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Chase County Rural No 214.2 (143.9, 311.6) 9 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Cherry County Rural No 148.4 (99.7, 215.6) 69 (5, 72) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Harlan County Rural No 217.6 (146.6, 321.7) 7 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Polk County Rural No 152.6 (103.3, 221.8) 65 (6, 72) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Antelope County Rural No 137.2 (92.1, 199.2) 71 (9, 72) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.7)
Boone County Rural No 153.0 (104.5, 220.5) 64 (6, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Nance County Rural No 355.2 (235.2, 514.4) 1 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.2)
Thayer County Rural No 181.8 (121.2, 265.1) 31 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Furnas County Rural No 197.2 (134.4, 283.0) 18 (1, 72) 7 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.5)
Sheridan County Rural No 158.5 (109.8, 226.4) 56 (4, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Johnson County Rural No 198.5 (137.8, 278.8) 17 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Kearney County Rural No 151.4 (106.1, 212.0) 67 (6, 72) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Nuckolls County Rural No 196.3 (137.4, 279.5) 19 (2, 72) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Pierce County Rural No 159.9 (112.0, 222.8) 55 (5, 72) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Clay County Rural No 203.3 (143.7, 280.9) 13 (2, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Howard County Urban No 170.8 (122.0, 235.3) 43 (4, 72) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Wayne County Rural No 154.8 (110.4, 212.0) 60 (6, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Fillmore County Rural No 194.8 (141.1, 266.4) 22 (2, 72) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Thurston County Rural No 322.3 (232.0, 435.0) 2 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Cedar County Rural No 144.9 (104.5, 197.7) 70 (12, 72) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Nemaha County Rural No 190.7 (137.9, 258.8) 23 (3, 72) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Merrick County Urban No 174.4 (127.4, 235.0) 39 (4, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.7)
Dawes County Rural No 196.0 (143.3, 263.2) 20 (2, 71) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Colfax County Rural No 201.2 (149.7, 264.2) 15 (2, 71) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Box Butte County Rural No 165.9 (123.5, 218.9) 47 (7, 72) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Knox County Rural No 173.1 (129.4, 229.1) 42 (4, 72) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Phelps County Rural No 186.1 (140.5, 243.2) 27 (4, 71) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Burt County Rural No 231.4 (173.3, 305.0) 4 (1, 64) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Cheyenne County Rural No 179.7 (135.4, 235.1) 33 (4, 72) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Cuming County Rural No 181.4 (136.1, 238.5) 32 (4, 72) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 188.8 (143.5, 245.1) 25 (3, 72) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 194.9 (148.0, 255.3) 21 (3, 70) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Custer County Rural No 157.2 (118.9, 205.4) 58 (9, 72) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Butler County Rural No 214.1 (163.4, 277.3) 10 (2, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Holt County Rural No 174.3 (132.0, 227.2) 40 (5, 72) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Saline County Rural No 153.0 (117.2, 196.7) 63 (11, 72) 13 falling falling trend -4.5 (-14.8, -1.3)
Keith County Rural No 173.4 (132.0, 226.7) 41 (5, 72) 13 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Richardson County Rural No 187.8 (144.6, 243.1) 26 (3, 71) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Red Willow County Rural No 175.5 (136.1, 224.3) 36 (6, 72) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Dakota County Urban No 149.8 (116.6, 189.2) 68 (14, 72) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Otoe County Rural No 164.2 (131.5, 203.3) 51 (9, 72) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Seward County Urban No 165.8 (133.0, 204.6) 48 (9, 72) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-9.1, -1.2)
York County Rural No 202.8 (164.7, 248.2) 14 (3, 63) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Dawson County Rural No 153.6 (126.0, 185.7) 62 (18, 72) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Saunders County Urban No 157.4 (129.1, 190.4) 57 (14, 72) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Washington County Urban No 189.2 (155.5, 228.4) 24 (5, 67) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Cass County Urban No 160.4 (132.5, 192.7) 54 (14, 71) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Gage County Rural No 185.0 (155.5, 219.1) 29 (6, 65) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Platte County Rural No 153.9 (130.5, 180.5) 61 (20, 72) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Madison County Rural No 165.3 (140.4, 193.4) 49 (14, 70) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Adams County Rural No 175.7 (149.8, 205.1) 34 (10, 68) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 174.8 (150.5, 202.1) 38 (10, 67) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 175.6 (151.9, 202.3) 35 (11, 67) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Buffalo County Rural No 167.6 (145.5, 192.2) 46 (15, 68) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Dodge County Rural No 185.8 (161.9, 212.5) 28 (8, 61) 45 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Hall County Urban No 151.7 (133.2, 171.9) 66 (28, 71) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Sarpy County Urban No 161.9 (149.1, 175.3) 52 (29, 66) 130 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Lancaster County Urban No 175.2 (165.6, 185.1) 37 (20, 54) 267 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Douglas County Urban No 183.8 (176.3, 191.6) 30 (16, 43) 482 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 1:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top